-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By nickelsilver · Posted
It seems the 101 is still the smallest- and yes, I've worked on a number of them, and their brother the 104 which is 2mm longer and 1mm wider. They are very nice movements, but get used in jewelry where they are squeezed in with tiny dials, not really practical for telling time. The Piaget 9P was the thinnest movement for some time, and is actually a really good runner, and much more legible at 20mm and round. The 101 is 14mm x 4.8mm rectangular. There's been a lot of new efforts on the "thinnest" front in recent years. I personally hate them all (not the classic Piaget stuff), but impressive work. Surprisingly Bulgari has the record now. I've never seen a Citizen 4520, man, that's small! -
By Neverenoughwatches · Posted
Anyone have this error come up ? It's happening almost constantly, every minute or so Been doing it for about 4 days now. -
Final step : I got a new crystal, and the watch is beautiful, although old. The funny thing is that I asked for estimations, and the answers went from 120 € on eBay to 800 € at an auction sale 🤔 -
A great! So there will be no energy absorbtion by the glass. 🤣 -
Good question no idea I'm guessing is a dictation problem again. Okay reading what I said it's more difficult to break? I guess I'm using the word difficult wrong okay let a quote myself in all change the wording Yes they can be broken but it's much harder to do than it is to break glass
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.