Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all - hope someone can help?

I have picked up a small bag of pocket watches - small ones, case diameter 40mm - assumed ladies or boys?

Anyway, my query.  The hallmarks are confusing and I've little help from my favourite website.

The Maker's mark is W.L (In a rectangle) and this, coupled with the Anchor mark and maker this a "William Lock & Co" watch, dated between 1881 and 1893 ("the mark 'W.L in a rectangle' was registered in October 1881. He changed the sponsor's mark to the W.L & Co initials in July 1893").  The "Lion Passant" is no help, just denoting sterling silver, sometime after 1820.

All straightforward enough.  Now onto the Date Mark: it is a "k" and of a font that means 1865 OR 1925, with neither date fitting when lock used W.L.

What's the date of this watch?

Another question.  I cannot find the mechanism in almighty Google (other search engines are available).  What am I looking at, please?

SAM_0049.JPG

SAM_0050.JPG

SAM_0053.JPG

SAM_0055.JPG

Posted

I believe though i could be wrong the case maker is either Walter Lunt or Walter Low, the date letter i think is 1833-34.

The movement may have a makers marking under one of those bridges or even the dial side. Ive often not seen the mark until it is disassembled , or it could be unmarked. The old ones are tricky to identify but someone else may know more than i :)

Posted

Don't Worry!  Thanks to my father's "Bradbury's" I can see what I never realised (oops); each assay office could have its own dating marks!  Was effectively using London Marks against Brum dates!

 

Thank you all!  1884 - not bad for the price of a 4-pack!

Posted

The movement is called a 5 bar movement with a cylinder escapement (no pallets) it has back key wind and back hand change. It is more than likely to be from the 1800 hundreds, It's a ladies watch. Some have exceptionally decorated enameled dials.  

Posted

Thank you OldHippy, that's remarkably informative yet concise!

I have ordered some keys so will update once I can see it wound

P.

 

 

Posted

I agree with Geo.

W.L & Co
William Lock & Co,
the mark 'W.L in a rectangle' was registered in October 1881. He changed the sponsor's mark to the W.L & Co initials in July 1893. Director names added at this time were Mr James Golbourne and Henry Loveridge. Latest records are for the early 1920's. Registered as Wholesale Jewellers, address was 176 Hockley Hill, Birmingham.
Birmingham 1900 hallmark

BIRMINGHAM116bis.jpg

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds.
    • Hi All I’m Mark a new member from the UK. I have a long standing interest in clocks and very recently pocket watches. I ended up here after purchasing a minute repeater in a rolled gold hunter case and looking forward to seeing repair advice on this. I hope to have lots of fun with my new found interest and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Thanks Mark 👍
    • Any way to fix dials to movements you can think of and more has been tried Glen. The dial is maybe not original, to the watch. The problem with dial dots, if the adhesive gets for whatever reason, they ease up on holding the dial in place. Attaching feet is a nice permanent solution, if you want to go to the trouble of it. Its a tricky process with risks however you do it. I'm not sure I've seen dials without feet before, but probably.  Often they are there and only push on to the movement with dial feet screws.
    • Hi everyone, An update. First of all, I would like to thank you for the information provided, it was very useful help. I was supposed to take more photos but with the beginner’s stress I ended up forgetting.  The watch was assembled in a Timex factory in Portugal (my country), 50 years ago (a piece of history that no longer exists) I followed the procedure described in the technical manual until the part of removing the hands (were misaligned) . At that time I noticed that the Date lever was out of place. Once placed correctly, everything was ok and the date started to change correctly. Since I had removed the hands, I adjusted the change of day and day of the week, which was changing too early and cleaned the dial. At this point I thought everything was ok, but during tests to check if the day and date were changing at the correct time I noticed that the movement was slightly loose (the movement wobbles in relation to the Date Frame on the opposite side to the crown). I ended up closing the watch and leaving it like that and trying to use it. It turns out that although, when the day and date were set, everything worked as expected the next day the date didn't change. I opened  it and I noticed that  the Date Lever moved back out of place again (photo). My conclusion is that a screw is missing (5145/1 - Pillar screw (short)) and this creates a gap between the movement and the Date frame, causing the Date lever to move out of place with normal wrist use. Over the weekend I will try to see if everything works correctly without wearing it on my wrist. If it is confirmed that a screw is missing, can anyone tell me if it is the same one used to screw in the rotor?  If that's the case, my best guess is to remove one of the screws from the rotor, take it to the watchmaker and see if he can get me one of identical dimensions. Any other ideas on what could cause the Date Lever to go out of place? Regards Vasco   PS - Placing the second hand was a pain in the A**
×
×
  • Create New...