Jump to content

Waltham 1899 17j won't wind fully keeps slipping


Recommended Posts

Hi all, this is my first post so please be gentle, I can wind it up about 4 turns and then something slips and looses all its tension and I wind it again and it does the same thing, so I brought a new mainspring from cousins uk out of the GR book page 195 under 16s 1899 witch lists it as part no 6991-TR as a 0.19 thickness, in my E.& J. SWIGART CO book it lists it as 4 different sizes 0.19  0.18  0.17  0.16  0.15, when I put the new spring in it done the same thing so I striped it down again thinking winding pinion teeth and crown wheel are badly warn but they are not !!, so with the crown wheel removed I tried to wind it up with a screwdriver and it still slipped, so I tried to close the spring tighter you guessed it SNAP, so I got another one but an 0.18 thickness put it in and still the same so my question is what am I doing wrong ??? do I still need to squeeze it in or should it be ok straight out of the box.

Many thanks Kaz

Thu Jun 09 20-04-55.jpgThu Jun 09 20-07-30.jpgThu Jun 09 20-08-43.jpgThu Jun 09 20-10-53.jpgThu Jun 09 20-14-09.jpgThu Jun 09 20-16-14.jpgThu Jun 09 20-20-43.jpgThu Jun 09 20-24-35.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, syfre said:

what you have is a Waltham motor barrel, the problem is at the other end, the spring slips at the barrel hook.

The end of the spring must be shaped to match the barrel wall, some explanation here :

http://mb.nawcc.org/showthread.php?68116-Waltham-Motor-Barrel-Mainspring-will-not-catch

Thanks for the reply, this is a pic of the actual spring, it all looks spot on to me but I know nothing, do you mean bend it in a bit the last 5 mm ?, I can't see how it can jump out as it is hooked it and the more you wind it the tighter it becomes.

many thanks for your help KazFri Jun 10 16-42-38.jpgFri Jun 10 16-41-17.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-12.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-21.jpg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like these conversions. I know a lot of people feel they are a Frankenstein watch but in my opinion it's nothing different than putting a seagull movement in a aftermarket case and making your own dial. Hey, Tiffany never made their own watches. I think these watches allow people to wear a beautiful movement again. Im in the process of making one as well as a gift. Good luck your watch looks great

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎17‎/‎06‎/‎2016 at 10:23 PM, jdm said:

It's really nice. How do you wind it? Where did you sourced the case?

I drilled a hole in the side and put a stem in a pin vice and just wind it like a key wound pocket watch.(hunter movement)

the case I came across on eBay with some other stuff, I can't believe how accurate the watch keeps time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎17‎/‎06‎/‎2016 at 10:53 PM, Joeydwatchmaker said:

I like these conversions. I know a lot of people feel they are a Frankenstein watch but in my opinion it's nothing different than putting a seagull movement in a aftermarket case and making your own dial. Hey, Tiffany never made their own watches. I think these watches allow people to wear a beautiful movement again. Im in the process of making one as well as a gift. Good luck your watch looks great

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

thanks I love it, and a good talking point down the pub. :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like these conversions. I know a lot of people feel they are a Frankenstein watch but in my opinion it's nothing different than putting a seagull movement in a aftermarket case and making your own dial. Hey, Tiffany never made their own watches. I think these watches allow people to wear a beautiful movement again. Im in the process of making one as well as a gift. Good luck your watch looks great

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for the reply, this is a pic of the actual spring, it all looks spot on to me but I know nothing, do you mean bend it in a bit the last 5 mm ?, I can't see how it can jump out as it is hooked it and the more you wind it the tighter it becomes.

many thanks for your help KazFri Jun 10 16-42-38.jpgFri Jun 10 16-41-17.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-12.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-21.jpg 

I think this is the best I am going to get it what do you think guys

 

Dial up

WP_20160613_16_50_06_Pro.jpg

Stem down

WP_20160613_16_52_16_Pro.jpg

Is this a size 0 pocket watch that you put into a wristwatch case?

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...