Jump to content

Another Minor Swiss Make - Borea


WillFly

Recommended Posts

I'm still snapping up (where I can) little-known Swiss wristwatches for a low price. This one, at £19, was a bit more than some of the more recent makes, but it arrived this morning and looks very good - keeping spot on time when compared with my Seiko Solar. When I wound it, the click sounded incredibly loud and positive. When I got the back off, I found out why! Never seen a click like that before...

 

I like expensive "name" watches as much as the next man - but these little-known brands are fun, cheap to get and remarkably good value, in many cases, for their price. This little bit of fun rejoices in having 1 jewel!

 

Borea%20face.JPG

 

Borea%20movement.JPG

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your're very much like me it would appear, you see something a little bit different and you go for it.

You say this one has only one jewel! Surely there it has two, is there not another one on the other end of the balance staff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your're very much like me it would appear, you see something a little bit different and you go for it.

You say this one has only one jewel! Surely there it has two, is there not another one on the other end of the balance staff?

 

Your guess is as good as mine - the movement says quite clearly "One jewel, Unadjusted"! But, yes, you would have thought that the balance staff would have one each end... I've seen one or two old watches marked "One jewel", and never understood where it might be.

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typically these 1 jewellers are pin lever movements and the solitary gem is the balance cap jewel on the balance cock. The cap at the other end of the balance staff is a hardened steel plate, and all of the pivots run in plain bearings.

The rationale behind the use of a jewel in this particular location is that most of the time that the watch is not on the wrist it's likely to be sitting dial up (on the bedside table etc), with the balance staff vertical and spinning on the jewelled cap, with wear concentrated at that point. With the watch on the wrist its orientation is constantly changing and so wear is more evenly distributed. If steel were used for this bearing then the staff could effectively drill its way through.

That being said, Timex do seem to have solved the problem with their zero jewel "V-conic" escapements which just keep going with minimal, if indeed any, maintenance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Marc - that makes sense to me. I've just checked the time of this movement - wound at 9am this morning, and it's now nearly 10.30pm - and it's right to within a few seconds of my Seiko Solar. How long it remains that way, only Time will tell... :crazysmile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
    • When faced with say a pocket watch bridge which is cracked, silver soldering to repair is often the only option (hopefully someone wasn't there before hand with soft solder). I can generally do this succesfully and tidily with a small torch and miniscule pieces of silver solder, but on parts which were mercury amalgam gilded the heat can have have a deleterious effect on the finish.   I keep wondering if there's a good way to refinish these - and despite having the needful items would rather avoid using the mercury process.   In the past for electronic work I've gold plated PCBs but this involved gold potassium cyanide solution, which also doesn't realy belong at home. I've read that there are now safer alternatives but couldn't find more detail (and importantly how similar are the results to amalgam gilding, since I wouldn't want to refinish the whole watch). Pointers would be very welcome (and yes, I know solutions containing gold won't be cheap!) Alan
    • The first one is an Unruh max stake for pushing out staffs
×
×
  • Create New...