Jump to content

A Question About Omega


Recommended Posts

this falls under the other thread about watch value - sort of.

hopefully someone will know the answer to this question. i have been looking on and off at the vintage omega watches. i have noticed that when it's listed as "omega geneve" the auction doesn't usually start as high as it does when "geneve" is not in the listing. it doesn't usually sell for as much either.

can someone tell me why that would be the case? is it something like "harley davidson AMF"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this on the net I think it answers your question.

Just as Geneva is a more specific location than Switzerland, the designation "Geneve" is a more exacting mark of prestige given to watches by the Bureau de controle des Montres de Geneva. To qualify, in addition to matching all the above criterion for a Swiss watch, it must have had one of its major manufacturing steps take place within the Canton of Geneva. The theory is that at least 50% percent of the manufacturing costs will have been incurred "locally," protecting the trade and ensuring quality assembly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

strange. that would seem to make them want to be more desireable instead of what i've been finding. the "geneve" omegas don't seem to demand as much money. i've not a formal count, but anecdotally i find that you can get the "geneve" watches cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Geneve range of watches in the 60's and 70's where affordable watches placed at the lower end of the price range in the Omega line up where as the top of the line Omegas where chronometer rated or cased in gold the geneve watches rarely where with a few exceptions the main aim was to be affordable but still have the quality of other watches in the range just not all the bells and whistles.

I cant think of any equivalent range in todays line up as Omega seem to have taken the view that all their watches should be unaffordable :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve tried everything using both my blue and donut demag units.  I’ve even tried beating them with a steel hammer 🙂   im now trying heating them over gas flame — if that doesn’t work …..
    • The 110v supply could be problem with the blue one. Have you tried moving the piece to demag through different orientations manually as its drawn away ? As Nev quoted the magnetic fields of the demag have to overcome those of the steel. 
    • Thank you Marc! I re ran the TG. First I went ahead and checked the balance jewel on the regulator and it was bone dry. I cleaned and oiled it, not without some drama including pinging the capstone and searching my bench with a black light for 30 minutes and finally shone it on my face and looked in the mirror only to find it on my left cheek in my 2 day growth! Back in and on the Grapher we are at 275. However significant drop in DD (234) and CR (190 edited) positions tells me it's time for a complete cleaning and oiling.
    • My $12 blue one seems to work well enough for movements out of case. However for  tools with greater mass, such as my small and large anvils which are highly magnetized the blue unit is useless.   For whatever reason, my high current K&D donut unit just doesn’t seem to work, regardless of my attempts to use it as instructed in this thread (magnetizes stuff fine so I know it is energized).  
    • PUW1563 is the day/date version of the 1561 (date only). I have just measured a 1561 using the old "blob of paint on the rim" technique to determine the actual amplitude by observation, and then putting it on my TG and adjusting the TG lift angle until the displayed amplitude matches the observed amplitude. I get 48°. Not a million miles away but it will have overstated the amplitude by about 20° with the TG set to 52° (I tried that as well for completeness). So with a more appropriate lift angle set on your TG you would have got an amplitude reading of about 240°.
×
×
  • Create New...