Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

 

I'm in the process of stripping down my own Omega 285 for a service. Not something I've done before, and I'm trying to be careful :). The attached photos show a part that is puzzling me. Is the wheel permanently attached to the bridge, or is it removable? I don't want to just pull at it. Thanks

 

Stephen

 

post-373-0-98095800-1455445423_thumb.jpg

post-373-0-42884700-1455445432_thumb.jpg

Posted

The top wheel should really have been pulled off before removing the bridge. There is a special Presto No3 puller for doing this that has two claws on one side, and one on the other.

Do not try to remove the wheel from the bridge without the bridge being on the movement!

post-124-0-86757400-1455446756_thumb.jpe

post-124-0-28327100-1455446805_thumb.jpe

post-124-0-27952800-1455446862_thumb.jpe

  • Like 1
Posted

The wheel on top of the bridge is the indirect centre seconds wheel and it is a push fit onto the extended third wheel arbor which projects through the bridge.

 

It can (and indeed should) be removed to facilitate cleaning and oiling of the pivot but you must be careful. Being a push fit it just pulls off, however, the extended arbor is very delicate and any action that causes the wheel to cant or tip unevenly to one side or the other can very easily snap it.

 

You can get a puller specifically for the job which looks like a modified "Presto" type hands puller, another fairly safe approach is to use two single edged razor blades pushing in evenly on opposite sides to lift the wheel. Once there is sufficient clearance you can graduate to Stanley knife blades to complete the job.

 

Reassembly is best achieved using a staking tool, but if you don't have access to one then just careful even pressure.

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks very much guys, I'm glad I asked now! It's a shame I can't find a detailed service sheet anywhere, there are a few things about this movement slightly different to what I am used to. So to remove this wheel I need to apply even pressure undeneath the top wheel, with the bridge firmly secured?

 

Stephen

Posted

It all went fine thanks, and it's back together now. The only problem is today I managed to lose not one but two parts! One of the cap jewels (not sure which one, or even if they are different) shot off into space. I do have spares, but I have no idea how thick the original was. Is there any way to find out, or do I just have to experiment?

As well as that the intermediate wheel has vanished - it was there as I put it in place. I briefly turned the movement to check on something and obviously it fell out. Can't find it anywhere - I think it's the largest piece I've lost so far! Fortunately the watch is mine, but it is very annoying. I can't find a reference to this part. Are intermediate wheels known as anything else? Thanks

Stephen

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...