Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A local machinery auction this week is liquidating some watchmaker's equipment. Actually a truly absurd amount of it, from a machine collector's estate, making me wish I had waited a couple of months to buy my lathe because there are so many options at low prices.

Anyway - there are a handful of faceplates on 8mm collet mounts up for sale and I think I can probably get one. Having never had one in hand, they seem kind of large as described though - all are listed at either 4in (101mm) or 3 11/16in (93.7mm) diameter. As I understand it, WW lathes are 50mm from spindle center to bed so it seems like the 4 inch faceplates would not have enough clearance. Could I expect the 3 11/16in to fit with a WW headstock and bed? What is a typical diameter for a faceplate?

Also possible the description of "4 inches" is only a rough estimate by the auction house and not actually accurate.

Example the 3 11/16":

image.png.7e3b3c387bc1b876ca9a9af97076403f.png

I may have answered part of this - a lot of the listings on ebay from typical American lathe tool makers are specify about 3.75 inch diameters. Still I don't see any that specify 4 inches, but I am still guessing that is an overestimate by the auction broker.

Posted

Agreed, this is puzzling. Can you ask questions or inspect the lots before bidding? My Boley & Leinen Reform face plate is dia. 95mm exactly. It's possible that 4 inches is a slightly too large approximation, but why then make the distinction to 3 11/16 for the sake of 8mm? If the larger ones are truly 4" then they will clash with the bed, but then I have no idea which 8mm lathe would take them. All 8mm lathes have spindle height 50mm or less, as far as I know. The spindle height is, as you say, standard 50mm for W.W.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

Can you ask questions or inspect the lots before bidding?

I will email them to ask for an accurate measurement; they held an in person lot viewing a few days ago that I could not attend. There is so much I don't yet know, I could not assume that no 8mm lathe exists with a spindle height >50mm.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Both my ww lathes are a tiny bit over 50mm, so I guess 4" should just work. And, if needed, using a bigger lathe to reduce the diameter is easy.. If they're cheap: go for it!

Edited by caseback
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, caseback said:

Using a bigger lathe to reduce the diameter is easy.. If they're cheap: go for it!

Well I guess I'll have to buy a bigger lathe at this auction then! (there are many, many of them available)

Posted

So far there are no bids on the faceplates, while almost everything else has several bids. So I am hopeful they'll stay cheap. There are several Levin cross slides too probably for less than ebay prices, but I don't know that I'll be able to spend that much at this time.

Posted

WW is 50mm exactly. Levin, Derbyshire, Leinen, Boley Lorch and I'm sure most others making machines based on the WW standard are all 50mm. Marshall/Peerless are 2", or 50.8mm height.

 

Many lathe beds are slightly relieved in the center, so it could be possible to swing something a little over 100mm. More likely is the auctioneer had measured with a tape measure and called it 4" when it's like 98mm.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, caseback said:

Both my ww lathes are a tiny bit over 50mm

I measured the Reform, and yes it is >50mm; somewhere between 50.5 and 50.7mm. This is measured using pieces of bar stock resting on the flats of the bed, under the lowest point of the faceplate. Still not enough for clearance on dia. 4" though.

If the axis of the headstock were centred over the bed, then the channel in the middle would allow a fraction more clearance, but it's not, not on the Reform anyway.

1 hour ago, mbwatch said:

I don't know that I'll be able to spend that much at this time.

Buy low, sell on ebay!

Edited by Klassiker
Additional info about the measuring method.
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

WW is 50mm exactly. Levin, Derbyshire, Leinen, Boley Lorch and I'm sure most others making machines based on the WW standard are all 50mm. Marshall/Peerless are 2", or 50.8mm height.

 

Many lathe beds are slightly relieved in the center, so it could be possible to swing something a little over 100mm. More likely is the auctioneer had measured with a tape measure and called it 4" when it's like 98mm.

You're right. My first measurement was done using a guessometer (calipers). 

My 88,8mm diameter faceplate just clears a 5,6mm stack of gauge blocks. So: exacly 100mm. 20250422_204332.thumb.jpg.565f0d3c1023dbcdb5695c5aabe585c7.jpg

The relieved center might indeed give you a bit extra.

But, stepping a bit: It wouldn't make sense for a faceplate manufacturer to make a faceplate that wouldn't fit most 8mm lathes. So 4" is not very likely.

Edited by caseback
  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, caseback said:

But, stepping a bit: It wouldn't make sense for a faceplate manufacturer to make a faceplate that wouldn't fit most 8mm lathes. 

Exactly, that's why I wanted to ask.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am sure you agree that,    " physical reality is actually made up of structured information "  which defines the states energy may  realize in prescribed  states.      Universe is committing suicide then most of its functions stops, but what we know as  gravitation remains, thus ( as he concludes)  gravitation proves of no essence  for actualization  previous functions universe used to work according to.   No doubt mathamtic systems man has deviced  is basic and not neccessarilty correct . But if universe is informational,  its also computational.   Then we have something thats has no essence and computation systems indicates it as virtual.                 
    • Oh that is lovely, thank you. I also just cracked the crystal and lost one of the shock absorbers, so its gone in the separate baggy of 'maybe-one-day' 😄 I did learn the valuable lesson of not disassembling the shock absorbers. My next one is a Zaria 1509B. I think this one I'll take a bit more time with cause I'll need to source a couple of bits. It's also scary teeny.
    • More data on the oscillation tests: Vertical: 15-20 seconds…Abysmal Dial up: 1 min 15-30 seconds Any thoughts @nevenbekriev @JohnR725? My next thought is to oil the balance jewels to see if that helps. It’s certainly one major thing left that I haven’t done.
    • Hi. Once the pins have been withdrawn the brace let comes apart, never had a problem with these.
    • Hello and welcome to the forum added the racketa 2603 sheet incase you don’t have it. 4328_Raketa 2603.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...