Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

I'm brand new here and also new to watchmaking.

While servicing a eta 2824-2 movement I have run into the following issue. Dial down everything runs great, but when I turn the movement dial up the pallet fork disengages from the roller jewel on the balance shaft. It's a new balance wheel assembly as I assumed the original was bad and the cause. Pallet fork looks good, pivots are good and the jewels are not crooked. I am guessing the balance wheel has too much end shake (even though it doesn't seem to). It's baffling that it happens on both old and new balance assemblies. I can push down on the end of the balance bridge quite a bit before it slows the wheel.

Any thoughts?

 

Posted

How much endshake is there on the balance? I like to imagine the correct amount as about the thickness of the pivot. 

I assume the pallet is not bent, and the endshake OK?

Posted

I'll look more closely tonight and tomorrow. My initial look for the balance end shake seemed 'normal', that plus the fact this happened on the previous balance that I replaced makes me think its the pallet fork or the lower balance pivot jewel assembly. I'll report back soon. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Sassman said:

dial up the pallet fork disengages from the roller jewel on the balance shaft.

Are you sure about this diagnosis? Can you show us a picture (I understand that it'll be difficult to take when dial up)? 

Also very useful would be a picture (can be dial down) of the balance exactly from the side (to see if the balance cock is deformed). 

 

8 hours ago, mikepilk said:

How much endshake is there on the balance?

That's definitely the most logical explanation.

 

2 hours ago, Sassman said:

lower balance pivot jewel assembly

Upper (=balance cock), no? 

  • Like 1
Posted

Here are some pics, videos from iPad aren’t the right format. There is a lot of slop on the bottom balance pivot. Double checked and both pivots are good. Took both cap jewels out, cleaned and oiled. Rodicoed the settings and reinstalled. The balance bridge seems too high in my humble opinion.

IMG_0882.jpeg

IMG_0883.jpeg

IMG_0884.jpeg

IMG_0885.jpeg

IMG_0886.jpeg

IMG_0890.jpeg

Posted
35 minutes ago, Sassman said:

The balance bridge seems too high in my humble opinion.

It does look like it in your last picture! 

It can be bent down, but better to do so with the balance removed. 

 

 

39 minutes ago, Sassman said:

There is a lot of slop on the bottom balance

As said before, i doubt that the bottom (dial side) is the problem. The slop logically (and visually from your last picture) is at the top side (train side=balance cock) 

Posted

Resolved, sort of. Balance and fork now stay engaged. Yay! Rate is good, beat error good, but a bit low on amplitude. Might have bent the bridge too much.

IMG_0898.jpeg

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Sassman said:

Resolved, sort of. Balance and fork now stay engaged. Yay! Rate is good, beat error good, but a bit low on amplitude. Might have bent the bridge too much.

The amplitude is fine, don't worry about it. 

Did you bend the bridge? 

How much endshake is there - you just need a touch. As I mentioned, I like to think of it as about the thickness of the pivot

I think the bridge looked OK, but the balance was clearly sitting at a slant. 

image.png.ebc42178b6ce92071cf413f3483a2eb4.png

There are marks on the lower jewel, has someone fiddled with it and could it be sitting too low?

In which case you should have pushed the jewel mounting up and not bent the bridge. A misplaced jewel is more likely than a bent bridge

image.png.ba61ae0cdbbe495f1da070bb337b47aa.png

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 1
Posted

The replacement balance assembly is not an ETA part, might be why it didn’t sit right. The other might be like you said, the upper jewel may have needed to be pushed down. (Dial side) As it’s running well and assembled I’m going to leave it be for the moment. Curiosity will pull me in again and I’ll check out the jewel seat.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, mikepilk said:

but the balance was clearly sitting at a slant. 

image.png.ebc42178b6ce92071cf413f3483a2eb4.png

Can you post an "after" picture just like this? 

 

23 hours ago, Sassman said:

bit low on amplitude. Might have bent the bridge too much

Try to loosen the screw of the balance cock by just 1/2 a turn and see if amplitude increases. 

Was it higher before (dial down) you bent the cock? 

Posted (edited)

Here are pre and post service. Definitely an improvement. I serviced the mainspring and reinstalled it, might improve amplitude with a new one. I was using this watch as practice and wanted to try removing, cleaning and reinstalling the mainspring.

 

IMG_0899.jpeg

IMG_0795.jpeg

Edited by Sassman

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello, looking forward to participating on the forum here! I will mostly be listening and asking questions since I am an amateur hobbyist. I have most of the beginner hand tools and a Timegrapher. The extent of my tinkering consists of a successful Seiko 7S26 to NH36 movement swap inside an all original 1997 SKX007, along with a bunch of battery changes for friends and family. I have yet to tackle full disassembly and cleaning. Right now, I don't really have the budget or time to invest in a cleaning setup (even manual cleaning), but hopefully soon! I joined because I recently purchased a mechanical Timex Camper from 1994, and my searches for information regarding servicing and swapping out these Timex mechanical movements consistently led me to Watch Repair Talk. There is also a wealth of knowledge here about dial design, another area of interest for me. My other hobbies includes leather working (mostly small pieces, shoes eventually), crochet, sewing (would love to make clothing), design (especially type design), home espresso, cocktails, and tennis. I want to buy a film camera, but I don't need yet another expensive hobby involving last-century technology. Yes, I have ADHD.
    • HWGIKE#60 Accurist ETA 2390 Swiss lever, 21 jewels, full service A slim Accurist with a nice movement, eventless service, nice performance.  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England  
×
×
  • Create New...