Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm just starting out with learning to service and repair watches,  but I have acquired a number of watches and movements to practice on.

Some things that have ended up in my collection I am setting aside at first,  until I have developed some skill,  and have become somewhat less clumsy and ignorant.  Mainly they are things that look like more of a challenge,  or that I think are a bit special and therefore I don't want to risk damaging them.

So here is the first one - it was in a group of about six pocket watch movements that I bought on EBay about fifteen years ago. It's an English key-wind fusee movement that I think is from some time around 1850.  Transaction details are lost in time,  but I think I paid about $50 for the six movements.

20240921_121827.thumb.jpg.60d5855f57a85d9243db68591747c86d.jpg  

20240921_121853.thumb.jpg.20a13a2046b75be9d9078754afe4b33b.jpg

It is signed by Savory and Sons of London.  According to Loomes,  they were active from 1839 to 1863.

The balance staff appears to be broken, but the fusee chain is intact and in place.

20240921_122518.thumb.jpg.aa697a2fd6b42b03049a8a8f490a74bf.jpg

 

20240921_122306.thumb.jpg.3bbd401c520dc22e4a756a121e832a93.jpg

The dial looks OK,  but there are no hands,  and the sub seconds arbor looks bent.   Of course,  there is no case. 

20240921_123058.thumb.jpg.937e755b0aa58d3aa57fa4768ad77a09.jpg

Question:  Would that square on the arbor be for setting the hands?

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, AndyGSi said:

Strange how the movement is marked Coinhill but everywhere I look for Savory & Sons it's listed as Cornhill?

image.thumb.png.4739b4fd969137e419fdd2069d50bb1c.png

Spelling lost in translation...English engaving to English text lol. I think the engraver actually messed up and then tried to rectify it with a half attempted r. Notice the apostrophe over the r and the enlarged over the i dot with half the r.....and then he thought "oh fuk it " 😅

Thats a big piece to mess-up and have to remake , one of the lads may have done it and then probably got a good hiding when the old man saw it. 😅

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Strange how the movement is marked Coinhill but everywhere I look for Savory & Sons it's listed as Cornhill?

Wow!  I had been reading that as "Cornhill",  but when I compare it with the second "i",  I can see what you mean.   Now you've pointed it out,  it is impossible to unsee. 😅

 

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I think the engraver actually messed up and then tried to rectify it with a half attempted r. Notice the apostrophe over the r and the enlarged over the i dot with half the r.....and then he thought "oh fuk it " 😅

Probably ruined his whole day,  or worse.   I wonder if it was an apprentice,  and if he tried to cover up his own mistake,  or perhaps someone helped him.

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thats a big piece to mess-up and have to remake , one of the lads may have done it and then probably got a good hiding when the old man saw it. 😅

I do wonder what life would have been like in that workshop,  40 years or so before my grandfather was born.  Like something from a Charles Dickens novel perhaps.   I don't suppose they would have imagined that 170 years later, their watch would end up in Australia,  with an amateur wondering about how to repair it.

  • Like 2
Posted

OK, here's my next one.

Sometime around 2007,  I had the opportunity to buy some things from a clock and watch hobbyist who was moving to aged care.   Basically there were two cartons of stuff,  and he was asking for $100,  "take it or leave it."   One of the cartons had a number of chiming clock movements and chime blocks with their rods,  and these were what interested me at that time,  so I handed over the hundred and took the boxes home.

On arrival,  I unpacked the cartons,  and discovered I had also bought a couple of shoe boxes of watch parts,  including many crystals,  some balances and other things,  and a few wristwatches.

I put the watch items away in a cabinet,  and didn't look at them again until recently.  Some of the watches look interesting,  including a very lovely Bulova,  that seems to have nothing wrong with it except a broken crystal.

Another one,  a Seiko,  looked to be a real basket case.  It seems to have spent a number of years in "wristwatch hell." I can't imagine what happened to it to leave it in this condition:

20241206_191855.thumb.jpg.83343c9d0995fbd539c2ca8fd0a10839.jpg

Yes,  it's a 6139-6001.  Not quite a Pogue,  since I think this is an earlier model than the watch that the Colonel took to Skylab,  but still very interesting.

The dial looks corroded,  there are no hands,  the stem is broken,  the bezel ring looks really beat up, and the crystal is badly scuffed.

And it gets worse!

20241206_191928.thumb.jpg.6536111c510508977b2e1d02d067fdd2.jpg

There is rust.  The case ring seems to be wrongly fitted so that it jams the winding weight and also prevents the case back from being screwed on.

At least I still have the case back.  A 1971 model by the look of it.

20241206_192015.thumb.jpg.1aee2d9f2e73d8d5f7385527dd40e9b8.jpg

The watch appears to have been stored in  an open box in a garden shed for a number of years before I got it.  I now have it stored in a dust proof plastic box,  but when I took it out and put it on the mat to take these pictures,  I'm fairly sure some body parts of a long-dead cockroach fell out of it. 😱

(Sorry,  I didn't think to take a picture of those,  but I am confident that they were not anything made by Seiko.)

20241206_192155.thumb.jpg.2b91fa042883fb2c304065a378c130e4.jpg

Oh yes,  one of the pushers is also missing,  and the other one is jammed.  I have bought a replacement stem,  but just the basic one,  not the one with the small wheel that operates the inner ring.

I know that parts for these are very expensive,  and original dials impossible,  so what do you think guys?

Would you say that this one is too far gone to be worth restoring,  or should I give it a try when I have enough experience to work on a chronograph movement?

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Be interesting to see the dial once the crystal has been removed.

I've seen worse bezels on watches being sold and the movement doesn't look
in too bad a state and NOS parts are still available if not a donor movement.

Edit

Just realised that looks like the wrong crown.

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Be interesting to see the dial once the crystal has been removed.

If the dial is as bad as it looks under that crystal, I would proudly wear this thing.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mbwatch said:

If the dial is as bad as it looks under that crystal, I would proudly wear this thing.

I don't think it will look that bad once the crystal has been swapped but I'd also wear it in whatever condition

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ChrisInOz said:

OK, here's my next one.

Sometime around 2007,  I had the opportunity to buy some things from a clock and watch hobbyist who was moving to aged care.   Basically there were two cartons of stuff,  and he was asking for $100,  "take it or leave it."   One of the cartons had a number of chiming clock movements and chime blocks with their rods,  and these were what interested me at that time,  so I handed over the hundred and took the boxes home.

On arrival,  I unpacked the cartons,  and discovered I had also bought a couple of shoe boxes of watch parts,  including many crystals,  some balances and other things,  and a few wristwatches.

I put the watch items away in a cabinet,  and didn't look at them again until recently.  Some of the watches look interesting,  including a very lovely Bulova,  that seems to have nothing wrong with it except a broken crystal.

Another one,  a Seiko,  looked to be a real basket case.  It seems to have spent a number of years in "wristwatch hell." I can't imagine what happened to it to leave it in this condition:

20241206_191855.thumb.jpg.83343c9d0995fbd539c2ca8fd0a10839.jpg

Yes,  it's a 6139-6001.  Not quite a Pogue,  since I think this is an earlier model than the watch that the Colonel took to Skylab,  but still very interesting.

The dial looks corroded,  there are no hands,  the stem is broken,  the bezel ring looks really beat up, and the crystal is badly scuffed.

And it gets worse!

20241206_191928.thumb.jpg.6536111c510508977b2e1d02d067fdd2.jpg

There is rust.  The case ring seems to be wrongly fitted so that it jams the winding weight and also prevents the case back from being screwed on.

At least I still have the case back.  A 1971 model by the look of it.

20241206_192015.thumb.jpg.1aee2d9f2e73d8d5f7385527dd40e9b8.jpg

The watch appears to have been stored in  an open box in a garden shed for a number of years before I got it.  I now have it stored in a dust proof plastic box,  but when I took it out and put it on the mat to take these pictures,  I'm fairly sure some body parts of a long-dead cockroach fell out of it. 😱

(Sorry,  I didn't think to take a picture of those,  but I am confident that they were not anything made by Seiko.)

20241206_192155.thumb.jpg.2b91fa042883fb2c304065a378c130e4.jpg

Oh yes,  one of the pushers is also missing,  and the other one is jammed.  I have bought a replacement stem,  but just the basic one,  not the one with the small wheel that operates the inner ring.

I know that parts for these are very expensive,  and original dials impossible,  so what do you think guys?

Would you say that this one is too far gone to be worth restoring,  or should I give it a try when I have enough experience to work on a chronograph movement?

 

 

 

 

Look up Seiko Pogue. Right time frame, if dial is original with water resist 70m to the right of 9, could have some value.

Posted
1 hour ago, Razz said:

Look up Seiko Pogue. Right time frame, if dial is original with water resist 70m to the right of 9, could have some value.

Being 1971 and a 6001 a lot of people call this a pre pogue but would still have some value if working even in half decent condition.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, AndyGSi said:

Being 1971 and a 6001 a lot of people call this a pre pogue but would still have some value if working even in half decent condition.

I was thinking Capn Pogue's was a September '71 anything from Feb 1971 to April 1972 with sieko automatic, water resist 70m and the Suwa on the dial should be a true pogue. But the caseback 6001 is wrong and needs to be 6005...

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Just realised that looks like the wrong crown.

Thanks.   That broken stem, with crown attached,  was (loosely)  in the watch when I received it,  so perhaps it was part of a repair attempt by the previous owner.

Posted

I serviced one similarly rust damaged "blue Pogue" a while ago. Fortunately the critical parts were in good condition and the chrono wheel was good. It made a good beater. Even though there's heavy rust the wheels don't often get corroded at all. I say you service the movement, relume the dial and get the missing parts. The stem with the wheel is hard to find but I think aftermarket alternatives do exist. I even made a video of mine, of course it's narrated in Finnish so it's no use to anyone. It's got almost whopping 300 views!

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Razz said:

I was thinking Capn Pogue's was a September '71 anything from Feb 1971 to April 1972 with sieko automatic, water resist 70m and the Suwa on the dial should be a true pogue. But the caseback 6001 is wrong and needs to be 6005...

The 6005 is the only true Pogue in mine and a lot of other peoples opinion as being the US variant.

Posted

I tried to get some better pictures of the dial a couple of days ago.  Haven't been able to free it from the case though,  it appears to be stuck in place by dirt and corrosion.

20241211_164319.thumb.jpg.6536a42bd926e3e6437fa0bfd8805516.jpg

20241211_165316.thumb.jpg.41b042438a5e0fb74afc01796fa30c75.jpg

20241211_165403.thumb.jpg.1b528ee9ef4652d1e2e15ff6b511dcec.jpg

20241211_165443.thumb.jpg.9a849415f9f55affff35d5b7f05f369c.jpg

The movement doesn't look too bad

20241211_164628.thumb.jpg.7003d3e2d48558ca0f3e539922501376.jpg

20241211_164701.thumb.jpg.2827c2316ddfb46df2ef8fabe26663b4.jpg

but somebody has been very cruel to the case ring.

20241211_165024.thumb.jpg.d662890123c493b49767d96bb0bbb88f.jpg

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
×
×
  • Create New...