Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Preamble: one of the things that brought me here was a walk-through for servicing an ETA 2836-2 that resides in a Hamilton Khaki King.  Everything went very smoothly, and i came away from the experience feeling a bit.... well, froggy.  I saw a listing recently for a Kreuter with a FEF 310.  Bought it and a donor movement.  This was a good call, because it felt like at every turn, there was an issue.  Original balance had a roller jewel floating around inside the case, no snap action on the pallet, ect ect ect.  As I have now had this movement apart several times now and have gone through nearly every part swap or change-a-round i could think of, the balance now sits stationary yet free to spin with a full wind.  The caseback has markings on it from the mid-1940s so feels like a shame to abandon it.

 

I'm at the point where I'd considering just taking the hit and taking the experience away from the project, or sourcing a functioning 310.  I'm not really at a place in my journey (tools, talent, and experience) where I can reasonably deal with a basketcase.  Hoping someone has some advice; do I put it down? Source a movement?  Thanks in advance.

Posted

My apologies, i didn't really doo a great job of stating my issue. I'm trying to figure out when it's time to keep pushing through an issue and when it's time to accept a loss and move on to another project.

 

The watch has actually started running and gained 4 minutes over 8 hours so I suppose it's not fair to call it a total loss, but still has issues I suspect are outside my skill set, at least for now.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, holdorf333 said:

My apologies, i didn't really doo a great job of stating my issue. I'm trying to figure out when it's time to keep pushing through an issue and when it's time to accept a loss and move on to another project.

 

The watch has actually started running and gained 4 minutes over 8 hours so I suppose it's not fair to call it a total loss, but still has issues I suspect are outside my skill set, at least for now.

Welcome to the forum matey. I  experienced this exact dilemma myself many times when i started and still do from time to time.  So my policy is to soldier on, and get the movement running to the best of my abilty at that time. This statement brings two thoughts to my mind: one, I dont realise what my ability is until I've soldiered on, and two, i have learnt so much more from having that attitude. The only things that would stop me in my tracks is lack of material or parts, which would  be rather surprising or requiring a specific tool, which again would be surprising.  Those two clauses generally develop from... me being as tight as a duck's arse 🤣

To extra clarify the surprising statement...geez god knows how much stock i have ! and geez god knows how many tools I now have ! And if i dont have the tool i would probably try to make it rather than buy it, which again stems from being as tight as....😄

So enough about why I do what I do, lets have you doing it. So whats the crack with your watch, what are you looking to fix ? The extra time over accuracy , is this just a required regulation adjustment or something more ?

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted (edited)

I'm working with limited experience here, but my assumption is too little (maybe too much?) endshake on the balance shaft, which is beyond my skillset to adjust at least as of now. Honestly, accepting it for what it is and revisiting it at a later date is where I'll most likely end up heading.

Edited by holdorf333

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
×
×
  • Create New...