Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, 

I managed to get a beautiful vintage hand fitting press for 50 bucks. 

I'm wondering about the best way to hold the movement when using it. Without buying ridiculously expensive calibre-specific movement holders. 

The base has a 31mm diameter. 

So, here are my options as far as I can see:

1. Just put my regular Bergeon 4040/4039 movement holder on a the base (well, using a flat surface of some sort in between the base and the holder). Of course, centering the movement will have to be manual. 

2. Use one of these. They have a 31mm base, so that works with my tool. Are they any good? Will movement actually lay flat on them? 

Screenshot_20241116_102925_Chrome.thumb.jpg.502079569f2f563131e6c09a08a26352.jpg

 

3. Buy a set of movement specific movement holders from AliX and hope that they can be used for other movements, too. I believe that they also have a 31mm base. 

Screenshot_20241116_105822_Chrome.thumb.jpg.85c032b3edabb49646148966312413d8.jpg

 

 

Any other suggestions? 

20241116_090019.jpg

Posted

I would suggest you need the proper movement holders - you need the movement absolutely flat. 

I bought a cheap hand press where I have to use the regular Bergeon 4040 holder. As movements rarely sit absolutely flat, I decided it was pointless and stopped using it. I prefer to hand hold the movement holder under the microscope, and use hand pushers. That way I can see the hands are sat squarely and can set  the correct depth precisely. The other problem I found with the press was that it was fiddly to get the correct depth - checking under the microscope, back to the press, repeat etc

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Imo that tool is for series work. I have it, but don‘t use it: too many adjustments needed in advance. 

Base in pic #1 would be nice and quick, but this one (chinese?) looks like they didn‘t understand how the original works: a moveable platform sliding down to a fixed middle pin. 

Frank

Posted
1 hour ago, praezis said:

Imo that tool is for series work. I have it, but don‘t use it: too many adjustments needed in advance. 

Base in pic #1 would be nice and quick, but this one (chinese?) looks like they didn‘t understand how the original works: a moveable platform sliding down to a fixed middle pin. 

Frank

Yes indeed the Chinese clone. But I do think that it can be screwed up and down to adjust the height of the pin. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Knebo said:

Yes indeed the Chinese clone. But I do think that it can be screwed up and down to adjust the height of the pin. 

Yes, that‘s what I mean, laborious.
The original is self adjusting while keeping the movement flat.

I use a separate staking tool for setting hands.

Frank

Posted
3 hours ago, praezis said:

The original is self adjusting while keeping the movement flat.

Interesting. Was it spring loaded? 

Honestly, no idea how the Chinese one works. I just assume it was by screwing.. even in the original. 

Posted
16 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

If you have a 3D printer you can print one out for each movement. That's what I do, takes about 10 minutes on my printer.

Yea...that would be nice if I had one

Posted

I have a Chinese copy of that hand press, and I use my Bergeon 4040 on a 3D printed platform that @gpraceman made for me. I don't know if he downloaded the model or made it himself, but it's what takes the tool from good to great. The platform fits snugly on the circular pad, and makes a nice wide base to fit your standard movement holder with lots of clearance. That little add on is what finally convinced me to get off my butt and either fix my old 3D printer or trade it in on a new one (which is what I did). 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

This is the 3D printed platform that I use.

https://www.printables.com/model/234556-platform-for-watch-hand-setting-tool?lang=en

That does give the flexibility to use any type of movement holder that you wish. 

I usually use the holder in the 2nd photo just in case I need to support the center jewel when pressing on hands.  You need an Allen wrench to adjust the center pin, though.  I leave the pin flush usually, as a flat platform will provide some support to keep the main plate from flexing when pressing on the hands.

img_4722.thumb.jpg.5527bf92d32978c31820ef2f5c8ec5fc.jpg

20231214_100943.thumb.jpg.0b9478d7205a2a90e7551b744232bd52.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Knebo said:

Ahj, I missed this post! Just seeing it. 

Brilliant and thanks @gpraceman and @spectre6000

 

@gpraceman, so regarding the circular holder in the second picture: do you find that most movements lay flat on it?? 

So far the ones that I have tried on it lay flat.  I suppose that maybe an old bumper movement without the oscillating weight would be an issue.

Having the 3D printed platform option gives the flexibility to use any movement holder that you want.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hah! Well, California will have to do. Lived in TX for a brief period back in the early 70s, though, so maybe that counts. 🙂 Funny you should mention making vacuum tubes- I've actually tinkered with that! It's REALLY tough to do, and I've never made one more complicated than a simple diode that barely worked, but I have played around at it. But there's just no infrastructure for vacuum tube fabrication. I can get a lathe and learn how to use it to make complex parts, and while it might take a while to learn- and money to get the equipment, of course- it is possible to do more or less "off the shelf". But vacuum tubes, not so much. There are a few folks out there doing some crazy cool work with bespoke tubes, but they have setups that are far beyond what I can manage in my environment and it's mostly stuff they built by hand. I also have been playing with making piezoelectric Rochelle Salt crystals to replace ancient vacuum tube turntable needles- nobody's made those commercially for probably 60 years. I'm a sucker for learning how to do weird things no one does any more so I can make things no one uses work again. (I think this is drifting off the topic of lathes, lol).
    • You shoulda been born in Texas. Tough to make a vacuum tube though. You can substitute with a MOSFET eq ckt I guess. I was playing around making a pinion the other day. More to it than meets the eye.
    • Well, turns out it was a fake bezel! The crystal is domed mineral glass and I was able to find a cheap replacement that should be here in two days.  I used my crappy little press to pop out the cracked crystal, Ill give the case a good cleaning in the meantime and do a once over on the movement.     
    • Early ‘90s Debenhams in Oxford Street at InTime Watch Repairs. The older guy was one of my mentors Mr John Campfield, fantastic ex-Omega watchmaker. Good times - black hair gone now! 😄
    • Heh. Well, also I just want to be able to do it, for no other reason than it's interesting. Same reason I restore antique tube radios and ancient computers- like, from the 1970s.  Sometimes, the parts just aren't there and you have to know how to make them. Learning how is a challenge and can take months or years, but it's honestly the best part! You can't beat that sense of triumph when you do something that's really hard to learn to do and do it well.  
×
×
  • Create New...