Jump to content

Hairspring Manipulation


Recommended Posts

I struggle with manipulating hairsprings when they are out of round or flat and im sure im not alone. I love the video that is posted by mark about this, my question is would it be best to have a microscope while trying to repair hairsprings? I struggle with my 10x loupe to see where the bends are when it is out of flat and am thinking about buying a microscope to be able to better repair them. Thanks everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I struggle with manipulating hairsprings when they are out of round or flat and im sure im not alone. I love the video that is posted by mark about this, my question is would it be best to have a microscope while trying to repair hairsprings? I struggle with my 10x loupe to see where the bends are when it is out of flat and am thinking about buying a microscope to be able to better repair them. Thanks everyone.

It is a difficult job but it gets easier the more you work on them. I improved my manipulating by practising on old duff hairsprings & adopting my own methods. For me for getting the spring round I found holding the spring with good quality tweezers & bending the spring with a pin. Also for me getting a spring flat I found putting the spring over an appropriate size hole on a small stake & pushing it towards the hole. But this works for me but I dare say others have their own methods. The bottom line is lots of practice is the only way to improve.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In answer to your original question, yes it's most beneficial to use a scope, "see it big and adjust small" is the motto on hairsprings. The only restriction on a scope is the working height you may have over the spring, obviously you need enough of this to get your tweezers and teasers in there.

The benefits of using a scope over loupe is the vertical view, this helps in checking the coils are perpendicular to the horizontal.

The uniformity of the coils is most important to achieve good isochronism, if your not uniform in both form and space you will suffer in terms of position and mainspring power drop. Most people with a modicum of hairspring tweeking can get a good result in a couple of positions at full wind but when half wound it goes to pot !!

Remember when your spring was originally formed it was a perfect coil, that's how it should be when your finished, or as close as you can get

To give you an example of extremes, think shadow graph. A dark room, a flash light with the hairspring in front of it, and a white wall a distance away showing the hairspring shadow projected on to the wall.

If the distance between the torch/ hairspring and the wall was large enough it would give you exceptional magnification of the whole spring and not just an isolated area. It's total form and your view of this would be probably the best you could get, every flat or kink could be easily seen, that what your aiming to achieve.

Hairsprings are always difficult to work on but time and patience pay dividends, limit your spring work to an hour or so, clear your work area of all obstacles and have only your tweezers and teasers to hand. Remember the slight distraction can ruin your hours of work.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In answer to your original question, yes it's most beneficial to use a scope, "see it big and adjust small" is the motto on hairsprings. The only restriction on a scope is the working height you may have over the spring, obviously you need enough of this to get your tweezers and teasers in there.

The benefits of using a scope over loupe is the vertical view, this helps in checking the coils are perpendicular to the horizontal.

The uniformity of the coils is most important to achieve good isochronism, if your not uniform in both form and space you will suffer in terms of position and mainspring power drop. Most people with a modicum of hairspring tweeking can get a good result in a couple of positions at full wind but when half wound it goes to pot !!

Remember when your spring was originally formed it was a perfect coil, that's how it should be when your finished, or as close as you can get

To give you an example of extremes, think shadow graph. A dark room, a flash light with the hairspring in front of it, and a white wall a distance away showing the hairspring shadow projected on to the wall.

If the distance between the torch/ hairspring and the wall was large enough it would give you exceptional magnification of the whole spring and not just an isolated area. It's total form and your view of this would be probably the best you could get, every flat or kink could be easily seen, that what your aiming to achieve.

Hairsprings are always difficult to work on but time and patience pay dividends, limit your spring work to an hour or so, clear your work area of all obstacles and have only your tweezers and teasers to hand. Remember the slight distraction can ruin your hours of work.

Excellent post great explanation and I agree 100%. Good magnification is a real help with good light. Getting all the coils the same distance apart & with the same angle/round is really important certainly for the final bend.

As a bit of a side issue some springs adjust with the tiniest amount of pressure & I wonder if this is because of their age & it has lost some of it,s strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The wheels turned fine. I set the escape wheel in the epoxy when it had just ‘skinned’ and wasn’t set, made sure it spun with the 4th wheel, and let it set.    After cleaning I assembled the barrel and wheel train - all fine. Moving the barrel the escape wheel spun freely. I put a bit of 9010 in my epoxy setting.    It went wrong when I put the pallet fork in. It wasn’t seated right (no jewels) and the escape wheel  knocked a pallet jewel out. I have no idea how to reset a pallet jewel - epoxy again? I’m not spending any more time on this one - it’s missing hands and the front half of the case anyway, and I have more watches ready to put on the bench. 
    • No John, we don't want Mark to change anything, we are just scared of losing a brilliant forum and losing contact with each other.  As pointed out, this forum is full of knowledge and I for one,  consider the regulars friends. I would hate to lose contact with you and the others.   PS, this forum is really important to me. 
    • one little minor problem with your chemistry experiment here which is what exactly is epilam? In other words is it an exact substance with the chemical you specify or is it a term? For instance originally it was steric acid either dissolved in some sort of solvent or it was applied by vaporizing it. Then now it's all kinds of different things the watch companies all have different ideas there's a whole bunch of patents. So is not always an exact substance.   let me snip out a image from the patent that I attached up above. Notice I highlighted something it seems to disagree with your evaluation.  
    • I guess You had to try, as it would be hard to sleep without that try, but, I know the result before the experiment... As I told before, the friction will be so big that the wheel will not turn. The pivots have to be thin and polished - the bigger the number of the wheel (2th, 3gh, 4th...), the thinner the pivot. What You are trying to do is possible, but forming the new thin pivot must be done on lathe. Thus the wheel will get shorter, but can have new pivot without the drilling for normal standard repivoting. Then piece of brass can be soldered under the pivot hole in the bridge and new hole drilled in it to form the new bearing.  Well, this way is not the recommended one, not quite correct, but it is possible to do for the excersize... When I say lathe, lathe may be verry simple, someting like turns, but made of what one has in reach of his hands. If You want to try, I will try to guide
    • yes by all means let's gather up our weapons tar feathers find the nearest tree in case Mark is not agreeable to our terms on our demands and storm his Castle. I don't quite understand what you're trying to do here? In other words you want Mark to somehow guarantee that the group will live on forever no matter what? You want Mark to somehow change his business model of what is trying to do or should we just take the group away from him? oh and is quite possible that Mark never realized that his discussion group would take on a life of its own. That the members of the group would like to continue on forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...