Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

My "practice" watch has a worn our balance pivot, so I ordered a balance complete. Pieces nr 4871 for Unitas 6310.

It's probably no big deal, but my original balance wheel has plenty of screws or similar protruding all around, while the new one I got doesn't.

What's the purpose of these thingies?

I haven't installed it yet, maybe next week.

Thanks

WIN_20240430_18_10_32_Pro.jpg

WIN_20240430_18_09_10_Pro.jpg

Posted

The balance with the screws is older technology, which was abandoned with the evolution of watchmaking. The screws can be replaced for regulation of the moment of inertia and poising.

The old balance seems to me to be for movement which was not shock protected, and the new one for sure is for shock protected movement. So, it makes me doubt if You will be able to use this new balance. Sorry, welcome to the world of watch repairs...

  • Like 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

The balance with the screws is older technology, which was abandoned with the evolution of watchmaking. The screws can be replaced for regulation of the moment of inertia and poising.

The old balance seems to me to be for movement which was not shock protected, and the new one for sure is for shock protected movement. So, it makes me doubt if You will be able to use this new balance. Sorry, welcome to the world of watch repairs...

Thanks for the input! It's definitely interesting to see if this fits.

When I bought it, the ad states that it's compatible with the following movements:

  •  Unitas 510, 
  •  Unitas 520,
  •  Unitas 630,
  •  Unitas 6310,
  •  Unitas 6310 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6365 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6470 Inca

So, is it posible for this balance complete to work in both shock protected and non-sp movements?

Posted
1 hour ago, BFernandes said:

 

 

1 hour ago, BFernandes said:

Thanks for the input! It's definitely interesting to see if this fits.

When I bought it, the ad states that it's compatible with the following movements:

  •  Unitas 510, 
  •  Unitas 520,
  •  Unitas 630,
  •  Unitas 6310,
  •  Unitas 6310 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6365 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6470 Inca

So, is it posible for this balance complete to work in both shock protected and non-sp movements?

But here there are two variations of the 6310, the staff height will be different 

3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 

But here there are two variations of the 6310, the staff height will be different 

There are actually at least four variations of staff heights 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, BFernandes said:

When I bought it, the ad states that it's compatible with the following movements:

  •  Unitas 510, 
  •  Unitas 520,
  •  Unitas 630,
  •  Unitas 6310,
  •  Unitas 6310 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6365 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6470 Inca

So, is it posible for this balance complete to work in both shock protected and non-sp movements?

cross referencing parts can be such an interesting so the UT 6310 at least according the parts list is supposed to have some form of shock system for the balance wheel.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=UT_6310

image.png.71f22ddeae833ab4907e0baa5102082c.png

4 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

There are actually at least four variations of staff heights 

I don't know if the staff heights vary because they're all listed in the same place but there are four separate balance staffs depending upon the type of balance wheel you have. So for instance the balance wheel with screws like yours would use a different staff than one without screws but there's only one listing for one balance complete so Balance complete should fit the watch regardless of which type it is.

Basically it indicates that there was an evolution of this watch the older balance wheel with screws than the newer type without.

image.png.07d0b8ce10ddde71fbb4a93bf0476346.png

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

cross referencing parts can be such an interesting so the UT 6310 at least according the parts list is supposed to have some form of shock system for the balance wheel.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=UT_6310

image.png.71f22ddeae833ab4907e0baa5102082c.png

I don't know if the staff heights vary because they're all listed in the same place but there are four separate balance staffs depending upon the type of balance wheel you have. So for instance the balance wheel with screws like yours would use a different staff than one without screws but there's only one listing for one balance complete so Balance complete should fit the watch regardless of which type it is.

Basically it indicates that there was an evolution of this watch the older balance wheel with screws than the newer type without.

image.png.07d0b8ce10ddde71fbb4a93bf0476346.png

 

I only looked at the balance staff site which showed four height variations and hub positions possibly down to different length pivots . 3 of them were very similar and a supershock variation that was very different.  So maybe this one will fit with a slight adjustment ( I'm not going to mention the words 'shimming the cock' i dont think i can handle that today 🙂 )

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, BFernandes said:

When I bought it, the ad states that it's compatible with the following movements:

  •  Unitas 510, 
  •  Unitas 520,
  •  Unitas 630,
  •  Unitas 6310,
  •  Unitas 6310 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6365 Inca,
  •  Unitas 6470 Inca

So, is it posible for this balance complete to work in both shock protected and non-sp movements?

With luck even possible to fit your 13 lin. movement at all 😀.

Those numbers are from 5 1/4, 8 3/4 and 13‘‘‘ sizes, with very different balance wheels!

Frank

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, praezis said:

With luck even possible to fit your 13 lin. movement at all 😀.

Those numbers are from 5 1/4, 8 3/4 and 13‘‘‘ sizes, with very different balance wheels!

Frank

Who'd have thought to look at the supposed compatible calibres ?  🤔 Frank did 😅

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

only looked at the balance staff site which showed four height variations and hub positions possibly down to different length pivots . 3 of them were very similar and a supershock variation that was very different.  So maybe this one will fit with a slight adjustment ( I'm not going to mention the words 'shimming the cock' i dont think i can

image.png.0984a987b56bab3215b53c0daee90453.png

then just as I want to see if there is any differences I looked in the balance staff book. So basically with the exception of the super shock whatever that is it looks like they're close enough in length  they should be fine.

 

image.png.7ee4c782adec26cb970f6f3140b6bc65.png

 

 

Posted

So I grew a pair today and installed the balance complete. 😄

And it's ticking. I made a 5 seconds clip, but I don't know how to upload it.

I'll put some strap and wear it today to see how it works.

Have a great day!

WIN_20240501_12_40_25_Pro.jpg

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, BFernandes said:

So I grew a pair today and installed the balance complete. 😄

And it's ticking. I made a 5 seconds clip, but I don't know how to upload it.

I'll put some strap and wear it today to see how it works.

Have a great day!

WIN_20240501_12_40_25_Pro.jpg

Haha, so you put your big boy pants on 👍😅.  Give it a day or so to settle in then regulate it again, will save you opening it back up again after you've worn it. 

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Posted

 

your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.

 

image.png.82ff48a337eae602dad3e7e35e9e3338.png

image.png.0ce4e284d54afa7674d866a4014ea0a3.png

then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin?

image.png.9208af1cf912c689ed773c0a6b4c27f1.png

then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way?

image.png.a7292afd978e8cd5247e71ab952c3469.png

it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules

image.png.bd98c2bdc894f04fb2af93761efce811.png

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
×
×
  • Create New...