Jump to content

Seiko vintage 6139-7100 crystal removal / replacement.


Recommended Posts

Hello All;

today I received a 1970's 6139-7100 "helmet" Seiko. The case and the original bracelet were, for a nearly 50 years old watch, "as new".

Never worked on these types of Seikos before, I've been watching YT video's hoping to learn how to remove the crystal. I think that I get the drift, but to be sure, I like to ask the forum.

IMG_3785.thumb.jpeg.5b5148a4d6b623829331f69b804f3e0c.jpeg

 

IMG_3784.thumb.jpeg.105c16765aa5c21ffb49ee7c8b335755.jpeg

It seems that by certain Seiko models one has to first remove the bezel. This 7100 case seems to be one of them, since it has a slot for a case-knife.

Am I correct it that?

Then what next? Can I expect some rings, and after that push the crystal out of a rubber seal?

Even thought the flat crystal looks great, certainly for its age (and perhaps I may use it again), but out of curiosity, can the crystal be replaced with a flat "standard" sapphire crystal?

Hope to hear from our Seiko specialists.......

Oh, BTW, from the serial number on the back 728957, is this a 1977?

IMG_3786.thumb.jpeg.c6edfb83b66f5658ee04e106dc30cdc7.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since 1978, Seiko has put an alphanumeric code on the back that tells you how to take the case part.  Which your watch doesn't have, being from 1977.

But there is a document Seiko used to publish with a table, and a scanned copy exists, and 6139-710 is in it (the last digit isn't used).  So you're lucky.  This case has class type F4:

 image.png.d6577516985bdc9ef64c37a3664c4d65.png

You are supposed to remove the bezel. The edge of the bezel extends over the glass.  The crystal has a large bevel on the top that allows this.  Because of that, it's likely a standard flat replacement glass will not fit.

Seiko 3. Casing Guide.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
    • I think we all get a lot out of this group, and it has been pivotal in my development by the sharing of knowledge, experience and learning from more seasoned experts such as @JohnR725 and others (you know who you are!) as well as fellow novices. I think that having a backup communication plan in reserve so that if there is a future problem just makes good sense. I don't think anyone is trying to undermine the forum, but if something unthinkable happens, like the Ranfft website for example, then it would be good if those who are willing can still keep in contact. Speaking personally, and I know I risk a charge of heresy, it would be good if Mark could be a little more visible in this forum, and maybe give any insight from time to time on the future/progress of forum and instructional videos etc. even if its just to confirm the status quo. I appreciate he is a busy man with a full time job, but so are most of the rest of us and to post a few lines every now and then shouldn't be too much to ask to reassure the restless villagers. Best outcome for me would be a message saying something along the lines of: "Hi guys, all good, no planned changes... enjoy the forum, will message again next month!" Just my two cents.
    • A nice looking watch !! Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?
    • Knocked out another 404 last night...when you are in the zone! This watch was a non-runner which I picked up as part of a lot of 8 watches, so works out to be $3.12 per watch. Before:   And the finished watch, new crown and stem and the crystal was cracked so was replaced. I also replaced the mainspring as the original was the old steel type spiral and very 'set' - all else is original: The Movement was a AS 1686, but in reading around a little the ACCRO watch company were sued for their use of the five point crown on their Jacques Pere range as it resembled Rolex, see below: ACCRO then reverted to just ACCRO on their watches - I have done some sniffing around the internet and haven't seen another example of ACCRO and the crown together on a dial so maybe I have something unusual, or maybe I was looking in the wrong places 🙂.  
×
×
  • Create New...