Jump to content

Pre-service was fine but Post-service watch doesn't run in vertical positions


Recommended Posts

This is a 1970 Bulova 10COAC movement that was running when I received it. The  timegrapher mostly looked good pre-service but showed about a 60 degree drop in amplitude in vertical positions:

DU: +3  295 amplitude, 1 ms BE
DD: +6   290 amplitude, 1.2 ms BE
CD: -6   230 amplitude, 1.2 ms BE
CU: -1   225 amplitude, 1.8 ms BE

I didn’t see anything during inspection that was an obvious cause for the positional deviations (no cracked jewels, all pivots looked good, etc). In fact, it was sold as NOS in the original box and looked really clean with none of the usual dried up oils. As I was installing the balance after servicing I dropped the balance and it bent the hairspring to the point where I don’t have the skills to fix it. I did have a spare donor movement (in parts) and took the balance complete from that.

The issue I am having is that now the watch stops when in vertical positions. Originally it looked like the impulse jewel was stuck on top of the pallet fork so I moved the stud arm to center it but it looks like the impulse jewel is still “riding high” and while it runs in dial down, as soon as I move it to a vertical position it will stop, sometimes with the impulse jewel overbanked. The pivots on the donor balance look fine. I haven’t tried running it yet with the train side balance jewel installed but I’ve never had this kind of an issue at this point in the service in the past without the jewel installed.

Any thoughts on what I should check next?
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

I haven’t tried running it yet with the train side balance jewel installed

Try installing them and see what happens

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...