Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, looking for some advice. I have just disassembled, cleaned, reassembled and lubricated a Vostok 2209 movement. I adjusted it and get a very good beat error and the regulation is OK. But the amplitude is really low, just 180 degrees. I have demagnetised the movement. When I look down the microscope, the oscillating hairspring does not look symmetrical. None of the coils are actually touching, but they look closer together the side away from the terminal coil and studs than the side near the terminal coil and studs. Any thoughts? thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OceanSprint said:

Hi, looking for some advice. I have just disassembled, cleaned, reassembled and lubricated a Vostok 2209 movement. I adjusted it and get a very good beat error and the regulation is OK. But the amplitude is really low, just 180 degrees. I have demagnetised the movement. When I look down the microscope, the oscillating hairspring does not look symmetrical. None of the coils are actually touching, but they look closer together the side away from the terminal coil and studs than the side near the terminal coil and studs. Any thoughts? thanks.

A picture will help.  The best way to center the coils is to remove the hairspring from the balance . Mount the hairspring back onto the balance cock and make adjustments at the stud to center the collet over the balance jewel. This might only be one half of the adjustments needed to fully adjust a hairspring for roundness and flatness. As you can see the hairspring is held at both of its ends so how the hairspring exits the stud AND the collet has an effect on how the hairspring behaves So adjustment at the collet may also be needed ( often not depending if any clumsy previous repair work ) by fitting the balance and hairspring into truing calipers to true the hairspring from its collet point. It can also be done by skeg of E ( eye ) by fitting the collet onto a needle or a broach. Hairspring then has to be remounted back onto the balance in the correct position ( its position should be marked on the balance wheel before removing ) fitted back onto the movement all without disturbing the adjustments that were made. This might sound a lot for a beginner to deal with but it is proper way and a goal to aim for as experience grows. A short cut without all those checks and adjustments, could easily be just one or 2 adjustments at the stud while the balance is fitted to the watch. A simple push pull or twist of the hairspring right as it leaves the stud may be all thats needed to round-up or flatten the hairspring into shape as long as the hairspring is exiting the collet reasonably well ( extra manipulation at the stud could compensate for very slight error at the collet ). If the balance has an Etachron adjustment system things will be much easier to set up. Dont forget  the regulator pins also play a part as well, the hairspring has essentially 3 points of contact 1. At the stud 2. At the collet 3. Between the regulator pins. Pay attention to all 3 areas, but generally its most often exiting at the stud and adjustment of the pins that need looking at. Post up some pickies and folk here will walk you through it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

Good question Ocean. 

Good Answer Never.

Working on hairsprings is my next learning curve endeavour. Starting today. Hairspring, hairspring and hairspring. Practice, practice and practice.

Practice is very important Ross, you might find that this is the most controlled thing you will have to do up to now over a lengthy period. The practice part facilitates the finest motor skills that we are capable of that we need to be develop to avoid trashing a spring. Its amazing how the brain has such control over the tiniest hand and eye coordination connection. Understanding helps to avoid mistakes, it can be a real struggle when something you expect to happen goes and does the complete opposite.  Take your time and think more than twice about what impact your move has.  A bit like chess, think a few more steps in front of where you are, and occasionally you will go back a step or two to be able to move forward. Very much like everything else in watch repair, unfortunately this little blighter can be very unforgiving of mistakes. Good luck today and above all enjoy it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2209 can be with Breguet hairspring or with flat one, depends on how old the movement is. Please show picture, on which this unsymmetrical hairspring can be seen. Can You do the free oscillations test?

And this dog on the picture, is it Gordon setter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OceanSprint said:

When I look down the microscope,

what are the things you want to be careful with the microscope is the phrase when you look down? In other words you're looking straight down at your watch it's a flat object except it's not a flat object it's a three dimensional object that range of what a tip the watch up and look inside ways and see if your hairspring is flat or whether it's touching anything.

11 hours ago, OceanSprint said:

very good beat error and the regulation is OK. But the amplitude is really low, just 180 degrees.

then I assume you have some sort of timing machine? Can we have a picture of the display? I find often times people will look at the numbers and don't look at the graphical part is I don't really understand it and then the numbers can become misleading so it be nice to get a picture of your timing machine results. Not just dial down but maybe crown down also. At least two positions minimum for diagnostic purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi guys,  Some of you who have been stuck down the rabbit hole of watchmaking know that a fair part of it is finding a solution to a particular problem, especially when it come to vintage watches and all their idiosyncrasies. And, to find the solution, some unorthodox approaches and methods are employed. I find a good watchmaker will find a way to overcome. So, I'm servicing this Tissot 784.2 and find the centre wheel jewel is toast. The flat side of the jewel which the centre wheel sits on is intact, but the oil sink/dial side is crumbling and half of it is gone. It might last this way for some time, but maybe not and I'm guessing more on the latter. When I pressed it out, it fell apart. I teach my students there are two golden rules of watchmaking. Rule one: You are like the S.A.S. with servicing. You are in and out with no one knowing you were ever there. Not leaving gnarled screw heads and scratched bridges, etc. Rule two: Always think and consider the next watchmaker who is going to work on the watch. Don't leave obvious problems, or bodge something together, knowing it will create problems for the next watchmaker who works on the movement. If rule one is adhered to, rule two covers itself. The point I'm making here is, I could have left the centre wheel jewel and it might have lasted, but that's leaving the problem for the next guy and not very SAS. For some reason Seitz have discontinued the jewel size I needed (Sods law!), so I found one in a scrap movement that was the correct inside diameter. 0.8 mm to take a 0.79 centre wheel arbor. The outside diameter of the replacement jewel was 1.5 mm, so I had to ream the centre hole a little bigger from 1.19 mm to 1.49 mm. The problem was the jewel was 0.4 mm deep, so sat proud on the dial side and stopped the cannon pinion from seating properly, as you can see from this photo. I needed the jewel to be 0.27 mm deep like the cracked old one.   Now, synthetic jewels are made from aluminium oxide with some colouring thrown in. Aluminium oxide is what is coated on wet and dry paper and as I don't have a diamond honing wheel, I decided to glue a piece of 400 grit onto a blank 8 mm collet and glue the jewel to a faced off wax chuck. Make sure the jewel is off-centre.     Then I used my 8 mm lathe to hone the jewel from 0.4 to 0.27 mm. I can only use a GIF, so here it is... Then I lay another jewel that is 0.4 mm deep next to the one I'm honing and compare how much has been honed. I use a feeler gauge between the wax chuck and the wet and dry to gauge how deep the jewel is, so when I remove the jewel from the chuck using acetone, I know it is pretty close to what I want and found on my bench micrometre that I had honed it to 0.275 mm, so 0.005 mm bigger, which I'll force myself to live with. 🤣 I was pretty impressed by the accuracy of doing this by eye with no CNC or even micrometre gauges whilst honing, just a rudimentary feeler gauge I made. Then I pressed in the jewel with a jewelling tool and set the correct end-shake for the centre wheel and ensured the cannon pinion sat correctly without touching the centre wheel jewel. There was no real need to polish the face of the jewel, as it isn't an acting surface, but could have done using the same method with different diamond micron pastes to get a mirror finish. The whole process probably took me close to an hour to figure out and work. Obviously the next time, it would be half as long. The diamond wheels would have made the job a lot quicker, as the wet and dry was wearing out making honing more difficult. I think with a diamond wheel, this could be done in a matter of minutes. A lot of the time was taken soaking the wax chuck in acetone and gently teasing the jewel away from the chuck. Because the jewel is so slim it is also very brittle and will easily break if this stage is rushed, so it's a matter of being patient and letting the acetone do its work and wipe away the melted superglue and gently prying it off with your fingers, not tweezers. You can't gauge how much pressure you are putting on the side of the jewel if you use tweezers. I could have saved myself time and effort by making a brass bush to fit, but I didn't like that idea I had robbed a jewel and broken one of my cardinal rules, which was more 'Dad's Army' rather than S.A.S.! It's a very similar way I hone down brass bushes, as parting them off on a lathe can't get total accuracy on the depth, so I finish them off like this. Now I've been successful using this method, I'm going to invest in some different grade diamond wheels for my lathe.  I hope this gives you ideas of overcoming obstacles and another reason to buy a lathe!
    • Hi and welcome the this very helpful forum, there is a lot of topics and resources here for your interests.....
    • Welcome, there are a lot of smart and helpful enthusiasts on this forum, watch repair is very rewarding....
    • The watch that got me into watches was a Cyma... I had it serviced shortly after I got it, and the watchmaker informed me it was a German issued officer's watch from WWII. Little tangs around the crystal from a battlefield repair via the tip of a bayonet to hold it in staring at me each time I check to see if I'm late for class... Deep dark history on my wrist without even knowing it... $35 on eBay from Ukraine with no hint of provenance unless you really knew what you were looking at... Which I most certainly did not! I just thought it was cool; didn't even know hand wound watches existed prior to purchasing it! This is definitely a thing. I'm an elder millennial, and graduated college right as the Great Recession hit. Of everyone I went to school with, I knew of precisely one other person to land a job on graduation (excluding things like retail and waiting tables). That gave me just enough of a head start to be able to buy a house right before the market went crazy. I have a few friends that have been able to buy houses, but very few. Not many friends with kids, and those that have them are all older (medically, 35 is the start of "old" for pregnancy). It's anecdotal, but it seems to thoroughly reflect the demographics and statistics I keep seeing...
    • How would you evaluate the teeth on these wheels?  They are from the power side. The chime side looks perfectly perfect.
×
×
  • Create New...