Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone to be honest a feel like given up watch repair it is complicated with out tutorials have been trying to repair hairsping for a long time now and I can't seem to get the hang of it don't know it something to do with my microscope a don't know have watched most videos to how to repair it but keep making it worse can someone tell me what am doing wrong are there any tutorials courses how to fix on bottom it has the micrope that I'm using 

20231108_235013.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark Lovick has a couple of very good instructional videos on YouTube. Look for how to repair a bent / twisted hairspring. Of course, he makes it look easy because of his years of practice, but the techniques work if you understand and apply them, slowly and carefully. After every adjustment, check to see if you made things better or worse.

What is the working distance under your micrscope? It looks too low to get your tweezers between the objective lens and the work surface. You have a ring light fitted, which is good, but no Barlow lens, is that right? You have two different eyepiece lenses fitted. Can you describe what you have there?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Murks said:

Hi everyone to be honest a feel like given up watch repair it is complicated with out tutorials have been trying to repair hairsping for a long time now and I can't seem to get the hang of it don't know it something to do with my microscope a don't know have watched most videos to how to repair it but keep making it worse can someone tell me what am doing wrong are there any tutorials courses how to fix on bottom it has the micrope that I'm using 

20231108_235013.jpg

Are you sure your impatience isn't getting the better of you murks. Good hairspring manipulation and the fine motor skills required takes months of practice and years to reach a near perfect skill for someone already gifted. Practice a little maybe 5 or 10 minutes each day with some scrap hairsprings. The last one i had to repair for a watch took me around 4 hours just to make it a round shape again thats without correcting any of the coil spacings or attempting some remaining vertical bends. You may need more space under your scope. You haven't  said how bad the hairspring is or what tweezers you are using, you might be more suited working with particular sets of tweezers. You must have a comfortable working position and be in a relaxed mood, your blood sugar must be stable, how much are your hands and fingers shaking . You need as much stability from your bench as possible,  shoulders down arms, wrists and the sides of the hands  resting on the bench, can you achieve that working on top of your scope's base ?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Klassiker said:

Of course, he makes it look easy because of his years of practice, but the techniques work if you understand and apply them, slowly and carefully. After every adjustment, check to see if you made things better or worse.

This is unfortunate classic problem of watch repair and YouTube. Typically on YouTube whoever's making a video will always make it look easy.

The reality of watch repair is like anything else that requires practice lots of practice. Preferably practicing on things that are disposable not practicing on live watches were problems have occurred.

2 hours ago, Klassiker said:

What is the working distance under your micrscope? It looks too low to get your tweezers between the objective lens and the work surface.

Microscopes are such interesting devices for instance a lot of them look identical. But visually looking the same doesn't mean that they are the same.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

with a microscope it will be difficult to use two tweezers in my opinion, I use a microscope every day for a lot of things but the best thing I like about them is the ability to inspect parts for wear, you might have to invest in a loupe, either one for glasses or wire loupe, a raised up desk too [or lower seat], hairspring work can be difficult even for masters, and then there is replacement parts if obtainable, sometimes a hairspring is beyond repair, don't give up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...