Jump to content

Poljot 3133 Resurrection


Recommended Posts

I'd call it a restoration, but right now it's pretty much a cadaver. I picked up the watch from eBay (which just today I realized was "bee" in pig Latin 😉 ) and stuck it in a drawer. A couple of days ago I had finished up another project and for some reason this one said "Hey, I want some attention, too." So I did a cursory inspection and decided to give it a go. 

Cosmetically the case is really worn where good portions of the plating are completely gone, but the case in general isn't in too banged up.

2020_0827_082851_004.thumb.JPG.7f27ea88840b1290e7adb1586f9b02b2.JPG

2020_0827_083309_007.thumb.JPG.df8f69ff0f8edc44814eacdaefaa26f0.JPG

At least one pusher is a replacement which would probably account for the problem we'll get to internally. The Dial itself is in really good shape even if the hands are very dirty with broken lume. 

Once the movement was out of the case I discovered three problems. One was a broken part and two others were completely missing.

3133project.thumb.jpg.61bc53261c991ad87881f3a2f12423c0.jpg

 

My guess is this was someone else's project watch which they tried to sell for parts after they broke the operating lever tab with the wrong pusher setup.  Two other things I discovered as I stripped it down was that most of the screw heads were mangled, marked or gouged and the whole drive train was swimming in oil. The keyless works in particular was so dirty that i had to put a piece of tissue down to keep the bench from being stained. Yuk. 

2020_0827_101707_054.thumb.JPG.552501469170507b78ef710a55be9fa2.JPG

Oh, and I did get the watch to run after cleaning some of the oil off the hairspring with a one dip bath. It's going to need more work.

Right now new parts are ordered, including a new mainspring. The old one is rather "unflat". I will definitely give all the parts a good pre-cleaning just to get the puddles of oil of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Poljot Blue Angels 3133. I assume you know it's a copy of the Valjoux 7734 (I believe they bought the old tools from the Swiss).

Endeavour does a nice walkthrough here 

 

And the Valjoux technical guide is useful

Valjoux-7733-7734-7736-technical-communication-service-manual-EBAUCHES-SA.pdf

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rossjackson01 said:

Mikepilk. Thank you for the download. I have a Breitling Top Time, using a Valjoux 7730 movement. Another 2 years of self imposed apprenticeship before I tackle it. I could probably do it now, but I want to do it properly.

You probably could do it now Ross, but you are doing the right thing by waiting. Especially for such a nice watch.

I started on pocket watches, then manual wind wrist watches, automatic movements, and finally alarm watches (Seiko Bell matic are good practice)  before finally a Chronograph, many years later.

Edited by mikepilk
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I assume you know it's a copy of the Valjoux 7734

Sure do, although I doubt the parts would be interchangeable. Right now it's on the back of the bench waiting for the replacement parts to arrive. Considering they are coming from Poland, Ukraine and Germany, it might be closer to Thanksgiving when I move forward with this. I guess I could start to clean the case. I haven't decided if I want to get it replated or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...