Jump to content

Identification of jewel setting


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

The pictures show a jewel setting (with damaged jewel) from one of my American pocket watches.

I’m looking to replace the jewel, but I’m a bit unsure of what kind of setting this is.  Is it a normal friction setting, like the ones found in modern Swiss watches?

Any input would be much appreciated.

89E9CB49-F47C-480C-BF3C-CA619611888E.jpeg

639DAB3C-0A91-441E-B7F3-8C9FBEFC2C6D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you give me the serial number and maker, I can tell you the setting type. You may even be able to tell yourself by inputting that data at pocketwatchdatabase.com, I don't recall if that info  is  available as public or a member function. I'm happy to look for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds great.

Maker: Burlington (Elgin)

Serial number: 2702748

It is the lower jewel (mainplate) for the third wheel. I can find a page with the part number (1340), that also says the setting is ”brass”. That doesn’t tell me very much, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ViktorH said:

Hi all,

The pictures show a jewel setting (with damaged jewel) from one of my American pocket watches.

I’m looking to replace the jewel, but I’m a bit unsure of what kind of setting this is.  Is it a normal friction setting, like the ones found in modern Swiss watches?

Any input would be much appreciated.

89E9CB49-F47C-480C-BF3C-CA619611888E.jpeg

639DAB3C-0A91-441E-B7F3-8C9FBEFC2C6D.jpeg

I'm no expert on pocket watches but look at this wavy edge how it seems to fold over the jewel. Is what is known as a rubbed in jewel, as with replacing all jewels they need special tools. Rubbing in a jewel is a more specialised task requiring hand tools. JohnR725 can give you much more detail with this

Screenshot_20230803-163834_Samsung Internet.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I'm no expert on pocket watches but look at this wavy edge how it seems to fold over the jewel. Is what is known as a rubbed in jewel, as with replacing all jewels they need special tools. Rubbing in a jewel is a more specialised task requiring hand tools. JohnR725 can give you much more detail with this

Screenshot_20230803-163834_Samsung Internet.jpg

Thanks. The jewel is flat on that side though. Not typical for rub-in? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ViktorH said:

Thanks. The jewel is flat on that side though. Not typical for rub-in? 

How do you mean flat on that side ? How does that affect the mounting of the jewel ? If the jewel is rubbed in you will be able to distinguish it from a friction jewel relatively easy. Look at the edge again, does it look to fold over ?

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

How do you mean flat on that side ? How does that affect the mounting of the jewel ? If the jewel is rubbed in you will be able to distinguish it from a friction jewel relatively easy. Look at the edge again, does it look to fold over ?

Looking at it from different angles, the edge does not look to be folded over, except maybe on a couple of small spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

If hou can see it folded over in places then it more than likely is rubbed in. Have you replaced a friction jewel before ?

Yes, I have replaced and adjusted friction settings a couple of times, on a bit more modern Swiss watches.

41 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

If hou can see it folded over in places then it more than likely is rubbed in. Have you replaced a friction jewel before ?

Edit:

I decided to push it out with my Swiss jewelling tool. Indeed it was ”rubbed in”. 👍 It wasn’t really obvious to my untrained eye before I pushed it out.

Did any of the old American pocket watches use modern friction settings?

A35825DA-A537-4067-B298-D1FB511CEF91.jpeg

Edited by ViktorH
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ViktorH said:

Looking at it from different angles, the edge does not look to be folded over, except maybe on a couple of small spots.

I have very little experience with rub-in settings, but the ones I’ve seen has been fold over at the convex side of the jewel.

Yes, I have replaced and adjusted friction settings a couple of times, on a bit more modern Swiss watches.

Hmm ok you've replaced friction jewels and you have a good understanding of how a friction jewel looks and fits into plate, bridge etc. they are pretty much the same throughout ? So by deduction does this in any way suggest that it could be a friction jewel 🤔 or could it be something different ? You know the answer to that I'm sure. So your attention is now turned to something different, some kind of rubbed in jewel maybe ? to which there are more than likely quite a few designs, many of which you will not have seen. Namely this type ? The watch is how old ?  Could the jewel be in the wrong way perhaps or not the original.  It does actually look like it has never been changed. My point being just because its not typical and you haven't seen that type , doesn't mean it shouldn't be what it actually is. I take nothing for granted any more and i bet there are guys on here with 30 + years of experience that dont either. That is a massive part of watch repair, embrace it my friend  🙂  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ViktorH said:

That sounds great.

Maker: Burlington (Elgin)

Serial number: 2702748

It is the lower jewel (mainplate) for the third wheel. I can find a page with the part number (1340), that also says the setting is ”brass”. That doesn’t tell me very much, unfortunately.

Elgin did not make the Burlington watch, Illinois did, and sorry, i did not see you had provided the info. If I can find out, i will,

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ViktorH said:

Yes, I have replaced and adjusted friction settings a couple of times, on a bit more modern Swiss watches.

Edit:

I decided to push it out with my Swiss jewelling tool. Indeed it was ”rubbed in”. 👍 It wasn’t really obvious to my untrained eye before I pushed it out.

Did any of the old American pocket watches use modern friction settings?

A35825DA-A537-4067-B298-D1FB511CEF91.jpeg

Never mind, it would have been a bugger for you replace anyway. Shame i didn't stop you in time, i was too busy waffling sorry. You've learned something which is always a bonus. JohnR725 may be able to help you to recover the situation as its way beyond me .

4 minutes ago, Galilea said:

Elgin did not make the Burlington watch, Illinois did, and sorry, i did not see you had provided the info. If I can find out, i will,

Bit late sweetie, we thought it was all over , it is now. 4-2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Never mind, it would have been a bugger for you replace anyway. Shame i didn't stop you in time, i was too busy waffling sorry. You've learned something which is always a bonus. JohnR725 may be able to help you to recover the situation as its way beyond me .

The rim seem to be intact, so I am hoping I can close it with one of the special tool, if I get one.

If not, the blame is definitely on me. 😊

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ViktorH said:

That sounds great.

Maker: Burlington (Elgin)

Serial number: 2702748

It is the lower jewel (mainplate) for the third wheel. I can find a page with the part number (1340), that also says the setting is ”brass”. That doesn’t tell me very much, unfortunately.

Hey are you sure you don't have a swiss fake there>? That s/n isn't holding water either way, I sure would like to see a pic of the entire movement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ViktorH said:

 

The rim seem to be intact, so I am hoping I can close it with one of the special tool, if I get one.

If not, the blame is definitely on me. 😊

You might be lucky , i hope so . But there are 2 sides i think. Finding the correct jewel size i very much hope in your favour. Like i said JohnR725 is the man for you . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

There she goes our very own Wonder Woman to the rescue, probably scrabbling around her huge stock pile. Need a leg up sweetie 🙂

Well, since you offered, will you kindly see if you can find a house under my watch pile, and if yes, then grab a walkie talkie and a st. bernard, and I will direct you to what this man needs from there.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ViktorH said:

It is the lower jewel (mainplate) for the third wheel. I can find a page with the part number (1340), that also says the setting is ”brass”. That doesn’t tell me very much, unfortunately.

image.png.6991a855505b783c6cab0f77bf3eb4f1.png

the parts list tells us the same thing.  In other words the setting should entirely push out with the jewel.

so basically you're not going to get a replacement jewel you're either going to have to manufacture something or work with what you have.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

image.png.6991a855505b783c6cab0f77bf3eb4f1.png

the parts list tells us the same thing.  In other words the setting should entirely push out with the jewel.

so basically you're not going to get a replacement jewel you're either going to have to manufacture something or work with what you have.

OK, I see. Many thanks for the clear answer!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

looks like a 12size Burlington, they where a mail order watch made by Illinois Watch Co., most of the jewels are in what's called a "jewel setting", a bit like the balance jewels, they are normally pressed in/out of the main plate [jewel and brass setting] I believe, you might have to find a donor watch, easily done on Ebay or another member.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also agree with @mikepilk and @Waggy. Your readings look good. The amplitude drop between the horizontal postion and the vertical position is nice and low (only 18° difference).  The delta of 17 sec (-3 to +14) between those positions is absolutely ok. If you really wanted to improve on this, I think you'd have to look into the poising of the balance wheel (not the spring, which looks perfect). But that's a total overkill for this kind of movement. Leave it be.
    • I've just finished refurbishing a Memostar Alarm with AS 1931 movement (same as 1945 but with date and running at 21600). I was also surprised how many parts are available at Cousins. Like you, I was missing the alarm stem (Cousins stock them) and I needed new crowns. It's a nice simple movement for an alarm, easier to service than a Seiko Bell-Matic. BTW I made a note in my Servicing spreadsheet: "Pull out winding stem before removal".  It may have just been wear on my movement, but I found that the yoke could move out of the clutch if the stem was removed in the normal position (like some ETAs).  You might find this interesting     
    • I picked up this alarm watch at a flea market several months ago and recently decided to investigate.  I am not finished, but well on my way. As you can see, there was significant water damage.  Running these parts through my L&R cleaner was not enough to clean them, so I did manual cleaning with one-dip and cotton swab (the dense pointed kind).  The wig-wag was stubborn--the two gears would not release from the plate.  I soaked it in Kroil overnight and that did the trick. There was some rust on the balance staff, but not actually on the pivots themselves.  Nevertheless, I chucked it a step-chuck on my lathe and burnished the pivots. The watch is running and I have confirmed that the alarm drive train is functioning.  Since I am missing a stem for the alarm, I have not done the final assemble of the alarm components.  Surprisingly, there are lots of parts available for this movement on Cousins.  I will probably get a couple of stems and maybe some other parts that I deem necessary. The watch is running at weak amplitude (about 190) and shows some poising issues.  I will work on that. The last two pictures are after partial reassembly.    
    • Hello and welcome to the forum.    Enjoy
    • Exactly!  It may not really be a joke, but the actual truth.
×
×
  • Create New...