Jump to content

Identifying a movement?


Martyn58

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! My first post so please bear with me if I do something ‘wrong’.

I’ve been asked to have a look at my father in law’s Westminster chimes mantle clock which hasn’t been run for some decades. 
 

Can anyone help me identify the movement? Maker?

 

Thanks in advance!!

 

Martyn

IMG_0534.jpeg

IMG_0535.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant see the whole of the stamp by the number 12 bottom right, I can only see Made in, so can you tell me? A stab in the dark if it is made in England then as the barrels are detachable I would say it could be a Garrard. Is there any I D on the dial? What is the case like?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Is there any I D on the dial? What is the case like?

Thanks for the reply. There’s no id on the dial. I’ll upload a photo. I’m in the UK so English might be the most likely origin. I don’t see the ‘Made in …’ stamp that you’re seeing so I’ll take a close up photo in the morning and upload it. 

IMG_0516.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha Ha Ha it must of been me seeing things that are not there, that's old age for you. The case is in the design as what is know as a napoleon hat. The clock hands are in the style called serpentine. Now I have spent more time looking at the movement I think it is German, so it was made before the WW2 I would date this to be around the the late 1920's to middle 1930's 

What do you intend to do? Are you thinking of taking the movement apart and cleaning it. It is complicated if its your first repair. You need to start on a timepiece or at least a strike.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

What do you intend to do?

Good morning! Thanks for the info. Well, for sure it needs disassembly and cleaning … parts have far too much oil and it’s grimy. I’m able to do a basic service of an Enfield strike … all except removing the mainsprings. I’ve also ‘learned’ the ETA 6497 pocket watch movement and a Seiko NH35 … so it’s not exactly my first project. But I’m anxious. That’s why I was hoping to find some information. 
 

I think my main worry is : might there be particular alignment of parts to ensure correct quarters chiming?  Or can the mechanism sort itself out?  
 

And you’ve prompted another question : are you saying that the barrels can be removed without separating the plates?

 

With all the other movements that I ‘worked on’ before I had a duplicate donor movement for reference, and YT videos. With this I have nothing so it’s a bit daunting. 
 

Thanks in advance for your time, and to anyone else who pitches in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes all three barrels can be removed with out taking the movement apart, make sure you let all three springs down first. The train on the strike side and chime side have to all be it the correct position to work properly.  As you have knowledge of a Smith's Enfield strike, the strike on this movement will be much the same to you.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

As you have knowledge of a Smith's Enfield strike, the strike on this movement will be much the same to you.   

Thanks for the info re barrels … I’m waiting for file handles to arrive to make a dedicated letdown key. I’m also getting closer to making my own spring winder. Wws. 
I’m not a quick worker … I’m in no hurry … so will spend some time just observing the running movement before I do anything. I guess I’m also anxious about getting the plates back together with more than 15 mobiles inside … remembering my experience with a Smiths pocket watch which only has a handful 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi this clock will have the auto correct pawls on it which means that when the hands are set by hand the chimes get out of sync and re sync at the hour, these can be a pest to get right so suggest you read up on it as there are quite a few simultaneous actins take place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2023 at 10:38 AM, oldhippy said:

make sure you let all three springs down first.

Barrels are fully let down … I’ll have a go at removing one tomorrow. But a rookie question about which clock plate to remove. On a Smiths it’s obvious but on this movement there are removable nuts on the under dial side. Removing those will allow the lugs ( for screwing movement into case ) to fall out of position. The back plate is held with screws. So nuts or screws?  Is there a convention as to which plate is lifted off?

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I believe its wound. I believe someone else was inside this watch before me. Which leads me to another question which is how do you know if a part looks correct if you have no experience with a certain movement before. How would I be able to tell if the hacking lever was bent or not without prior experience? This would go with any part for that matter. The keyless works have many parts with many bends in them. Could balance stones being placed upside down cause this issue?
    • The way the hairspring is sitting I wouldn't be surprised if the first coil is touching the stud when running. Easy 60+ seconds.
    • Thanks to both of you.  I had not yet grasped that removing weight was another regulation technique.  Either trying to re-pin the hairspring or removing weight from the balance, I'd estimate about a 50% chance of messing it up.  I'm experienced under a microscope, but new to watches, and that hairspring is much more fragile than any surface mount soldering I've done. I had nearly decided to just live with the deviation when I noticed it stopped running at all after about 4 hours.  There was still wind in the mainspring, and giving the movement a small shake got it running again for a short amount of time.  I guess I'm digging back in to figure out what's causing that.
    • I have one of these tools. Used it a couple of times and didn't like it. The problem is that when the power is dialed up high enough to pop the cover off, the cover usually flies across the room and then rolls under some furniture. The blade then continues to move forward due to the momentum and the hardened blade then punches a line into the lip of the case. This line would affect the seal of the gasket, making the case non-waterproof anymore. I've switched to using a Seiko-style case knife and find that this design allows the user to exert more wedging force due to using a pushing action. Even very tight casebacks can be popped off with this tool.
    • I agree with @Jon, the Tissot 79x are pretty straight forward and well-designed movements. If you can handle Seikos, you can handle this one, too. Unless you have never done any calendar works.    If you want to go down this route, you are lucky in the sense that the mainspring barrel is easily accessible WITHOUT removing the train wheels/bridge (you could maybe even leave the balance on, but then take extra care). See below. When you get to that point, make sure you gently "shake out" the barrel instead of roughly yanking it out and potentially bending the center wheel.   You might also find this thread useful (783 is the 784 without calendar):  
×
×
  • Create New...