Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello All;

I've read some of the recent replies of @JohnR725 and @nickelsilver regarding @VWatchie new Steiner Jacot tool, but it would be nice to get all the names of the parts, and their exact uses, in one place.

Seeing VWatchie's new shiny Steiner, I couldn't resist to search and stumbled over this Jacot tool, no it's not a Steiner, but it looks good none the less.

150794922_Z-3copy.jpg.cb9a3117056cd1fb3f01ecd65d3dcfc3.jpg

551244856_Z-5copy.jpg.f7ad8647fb94f4392b6eb8f597fd28a1.jpg

1919250492_Z-4copy.jpg.fea419860c30d72065b65e72d54a2435.jpg

It has quite a few runners and some additional parts. The covered lanterns should be in good condition.

Could our experts on this forum be so kind to explain what the different runners are, why and when to use and what the parts 6 (?) & 7 (center broach) are / used for?

Thank you in advance 😉

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
  • Endeavor changed the title to Jacot tool; part names and their uses .... ?
Posted

The parts 1,2,3,4, and 5 are what Bergeon and Horia (Steiner) call broaches, or broche in French. In my schooling they were called runners, and most English speakers I know call them that. The main body of the tool is usually called the frame. Number 7 is also called a runner in English (Horia just calls it a cylinder, also in French), but specified as the headstock runner- the headstock being the end of the frame with the pulley.

 

The different runners are for different sizes and types of pivots. In the above (and most sets), the runners with caps on one end are for smaller pivots, up perhaps 0.36mm. The caps cover the fragile lanterns, which allow working on the pivot ends. The short runner, with no lantern (#2 above) is for long pivots on 4th wheels that carry a second hand. They have longer beds and naturally make a tapered pivot. In the above set it looks like #3 could be an additional 4th wheel runner.

 

The runner with beds on both ends is for center wheels i.e. larger pivots. You would choose between headstock runner #7 or the one currently in the tool according to pivot size, usually one will do the normal range up to 0.30-40, the other up to the limit of the center wheel runner.

 

Finally, #6 is a limiter for the burnisher. It clamps onto the runner (tailstock runner, with beds), and can be positioned so that the burnisher can't ride up easily over a shoulder on conical pivots for example. They aren't very common, and I have to say I've never used one, even on teeny tiny ladies sized balance staffs. But I would say a useful thing to have!

 

The pivot gage is something that has always terrified me, and I've never used one of that style. It seems like a good way to mark or break a pivot. But it was a standard accessory for most Jacot tools. I much prefer a jeweled hole gage.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

@nickelsilver; Thank you very much 👍

I'll print it out and stick it, once the set arrives, in the box 😉

Indeed, I have had one of those (killer) pivot gauges before (throw it away, but now I'll receive another one 🙂 ) and they are ideal for ruining pivots, hence my DIY pivot-gauge:

 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 6/3/2023 at 3:28 AM, Endeavor said:

stumbled over this Jacot tool

Can you let us know where to get this tool?

  • 7 months later...
Posted (edited)

@nickelsilver

I finally got around to start learning the Jacot tool skills 🙂

Starting off, I was puzzled which runner to use, so I had to re-read your explanations.

Thereafter I thought it may be an idea to put a "face" to each type of runner bed to clarify your explanations.

On 6/3/2023 at 2:08 PM, nickelsilver said:

The different runners are for different sizes and types of pivots. In the above (and most sets), the runners with caps on one end are for smaller pivots, up perhaps 0.36mm. The caps cover the fragile lanterns, which allow working on the pivot ends. The short runner, with no lantern (#2 above) is for long pivots on 4th wheels that carry a second hand. They have longer beds and naturally make a tapered pivot. In the above set it looks like #3 could be an additional 4th wheel runner.

The runner with beds on both ends is for center wheels i.e. larger pivots. You would choose between headstock runner #7 or the one currently in the tool according to pivot size, usually one will do the normal range up to 0.30-40, the other up to the limit of the center wheel runner.

Runner #1 and runner #4; (the runners with the caps) for smaller pivots. Runner #1 has the sizes: 5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/13 and runner #2 has the sizes: 14/16/18/20/22/24/26/28/30.

14.jpg.ca8052024f82ece5d51836fe515645e0.jpg

Runner #2; for the 4th wheels with tapered end;

N2.jpg.883c81db1329af338eb09df5b9b4a899.jpg

Runner #3; (like runner #2) is indeed an additional 4th wheel runner for tapered pivots;

N3.jpg.152fca577b415e4219b385c6d06f6c7c.jpg

Runner #5; with beds on both sides, for the larger pivots, i.e center wheels. Covering the sizes: 32/34/36/4045/50/55/60 & 65 on one side and 70/75/80/85/90/95/100/110 &120 on the other side;

Runner5.jpg.b032e63a92b7f88d52e7da65e865037c.jpg

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 3
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 2/16/2024 at 5:49 PM, Endeavor said:

 

Runner5.jpg.b032e63a92b7f88d52e7da65e865037c.jpg

Wow, I had no idea it existed runners taking those large centre wheels. The maximum size on my Steiner runner for the centre wheels is 76 and too often it isn't enough. @nickelsilver I know you have Steiner Jacots, is there a runner for it taking pivots with a diameter > 0.76mm?

Posted (edited)

BTW; the running in the box, numbered #2, turns out to be a (sellers?) "fill-the-gap-in-the-box"-runner. It has a smaller diameter and doesn't fit the jacot-tool at all.

However, if I take runner #3 out of the Jacot tool, then all the slots in the box are filled and my set seems complete ......., at least I think that everything required is present (?)

 

Edited by Endeavor
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

Wow, I had no idea it existed runners taking those large centre wheels. The maximum size on my Steiner runner for the centre wheels is 76 and too often it isn't enough. @nickelsilver I know you have Steiner Jacots, is there a runner for it taking pivots with a diameter > 0.76mm?

I have two large sets, both go from 0.38 to 1.00mm on the center runner. My colleague has a large set that seems a little older, but still new style frame with replaceable beds on the runners that goes from 0.35 to 1.20mm.

 

I think you could order these with a choice of sizes; I've seen a number that go to 0.07 as the smallest, others that go down to 0.04mm. Some go in steps of 0.005mm on the smaller sizes, others in full 0.01mm steps. The set I use daily has 5 runners, with the 0.005 steps on the small sizes. The other large set (with center runner) has 4 runners, with the 0.01 steps. That one also has the height adjustable "headstock" (which I've never used other than to get it aligned).

 

One of my small sets goes down to 0.07mm for the smallest size- but has doubles of 0.11 and 0.12mm- so yet another variation! I guess it was ordered specifically knowing they would do a lot of those sizes. I've owned a bunch of these (20?), but I'm not a collector, so I just "upgraded" as better ones came along and sold off or gave away the others.

 

Something to really check on these is the concentricity of the headstock runner. The tiny (1.95 total length) staff I did recently was being a pain with pivots breaking in the Jacot. They weren't ultra small either, 0.07mm, and it's rare for me to break a pivot in the tool aside from just slipping with the burnisher or something. If the headstock runner isn't perfectly aligned with the bed, on very short parts the error is magnified; though it had been checked in the past I re-checked the headstock runner and it had a whopping 0.10+mm of runout! Got it true, next attempt worked great no problem. No idea how it got knocked out of true, but I work in a shared workshop and everyone is allowed to use my gear, so who knows.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi All. I would appreciate some advice for a complete newbie on getting into watch servicing - nothing serious,  just as a fun project. I've got a thing for hand-wound watches and would like to bring an old watch (or two) back to life, so looking to learn to do a strip-clean-oil-assemble cycle.   I've toyed with this idea in the past (years ago) and picked up a couple candidates to learn on, but never found the time for them.  One is an old Ingersoll, swiss-made 17 jewels. It seems to wind and tick. Casing, dial, glass are in great shape, so looks like a good candidate to me for the first service. The other is a Benrus DR23. It winds and makes a few reluctant ticks, but then seems to stop. Casing looks like a complete gonner, and the dial is in pretty poor shape too. If the movement is not broken and just needs a service, I wonder if there's any possibility of getting a cheapo Chinese casing & dial to fit this movement in, or is it extremely unlikely to be the right size?   For a start, I want to strip & assemble a movement, perhaps a dozen times to build up the basic parts handling skills. I see that online advice is to buy a Chinese-made ST36 for this purpose. Can I just go at the Benrus or Ingersoll instead, or does it make more sense to get a cheap ST for this? Thank you.    
    • Hi,  I have this vintage Navitimer 806 with a bezel that plays a little bit as shown in this video: https://imgur.com/a/2NjdiF0 How would you fix this? I don't see where a gasket would fit for instance. Also, it seems this issue happens sometimes with older Navitimers.  Thanks
    • This is a screenshot of a video of it running. Not the best quality, though.
    • Depends what sizes of watches you mostly service . If you were to say pocket watches then you might benefit by wholly replacing the 9010 for 9020. As a rough guide hp500 is twice the viscosity of 9020 which is twice the viscosity of 9010 at 20°c.  So hp500 would give you a more mid-range oil between thin 9010 and HP1300, but as it happens hp750 is more mid- range than hp500, but is that more or less useful when oiling a train of wheels. After the barrel arbor the jump down in pivot size is around half, then after the centre wheel maybe more than half until the escapement. And pivot size isn't especially a deciding factor, as the torque and speed of a pivot would be more relevant when thinking about which oil to choose. So 750 might only be useful on a centre wheel and nothing else, and 500 might be better than 1300 for oiling the centre wheel but still comprises the rest of the train, where 9020 would be ok for the train but too thin for the centre wheel, leaving only 1300 for the oiling of it. You see the problem we're having here. What can be ok for one thing is less ok for another in a different way, damping down power compared to oil spread.  Maybe mixing a drop from two opposite range viscosity synthetic oils will give you some approximate thickness of an in-between . You want a short answer now ?  I tnink I'd go with the 9020. Now be prepared for a whole host of different answers. Then to go with this, watch manufacturers change their minds about which oils to use more times than actresses change their knickers. 
×
×
  • Create New...