Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys. 

Recently tackled a 861 Speedmaster mark 2 for a mate and it was running well. 

It came back shortly after a brief wear and I found that the chrono stops at 58 seconds after after 3-5 hours of running. 

I've adjusted the spring pressure on the minute runner lever. Have inspected and cleaned centre wheel, the minute counter finger is in good nick and springs back well. No rust there. 

 

What's next? Really sick of it as I've done all the other chronograph controls. I fitted a NOS chronograph driving wheel as old one was a bit worn and warped. 

 

Should I fit a new centre wheel? 

 

Cheers 

Alex 

Posted

Stopping at just before 60 indicates something with the minute counter. The minute counter wheel needs to be absolutely free, and unlubricated; you should be able to nudge it forward or backward until a tooth just comes over the jumper tip and it should snap into place cleanly under the jumper tension. The jumper itself- clean, totally free, and the jumper spring should be nice and straight with the jumper removed.

 

The sliding gear should be set so that a tooth on its wheel points directly at the center of the chonograph runner. If it's off a little bit counter clockwise the finger on the runner can jam (though hard to happen on this caliber).

 

One thing I've encountered on this caliber is someone in the past screwed down the chronograph bridge without checking that the intermediate minute counter wheel has its pivot in its hole. That wheel is unjeweled; if you screw the bridge down in that condition (and don't break the pivot) it can make a divot in the bushing, sometimes slightly closing the hole. This can cause enough friction to to cause the minute counter wheel to not snap cleanly tooth to tooth with the jumper, or, even stop the watch with the chronograph running.

 

Have a look through, and try to post some clean close up pics of the chrono mechanism.

  • Like 3
Posted

I'm sure you have considered this, but I had a similar situation with a non-chronometer watch (so maybe it's not applicable in this situation?), where it turned out (at least this was my conclusion) that the barrel arbor hole was too slack (and this could be seen upon closer inspection) and lead to the barrel binding up. At high wind the spring force could overcome this additional friction/binding but as the spring wound down it had less and less energy to overcome this problem and it eventually stopped. I fixed the slack in the plate and the error did not re-appear, so some circumstantial evidence at least that my working theory was correct. It's a relatively easy check and therefore easy to rule in or out - just remove the wind from the spring and see if the ratchet wheel can 'rock' back and forwards - I learned this from Kalle Slaap of Chronoglide who always does this as part of his initial disassembly checks. Anyhow, something to try and (hopefully) remove from the suspects list 🙂.

Just thinking it may also be worth re-checking all the jewels for cracks or chips, but this would require a full disassembly of course.

 

Posted (edited)

Another question; what's the amplitude of the watch with and without the chronograph engaged? It seems, according to your information, that it runs for 3-5 hrs and then it stops with the seconds recording hand just at 58seconds, just at the point whereby the running works experience an additional load.

In simple terms; are the running works powerful enough to drive the chronograph or is it running out of steam after 3-5 hrs and can't bear the additional load anymore when it has to drive the minutes-recording wheel at 58 seconds?

What's the amplitude when you disengage the chronograph after it has stopped running (3-5hrs) and what's the amplitude at that point, after you zeroed the chronograph, engage it again and measure the amplitude between the 0-58 seconds?

You can also visually observe the amplitude of the balance wheel at the moment when it has to drive the minutes-recording wheel.

Perhaps there is nothing "wrong" with the chronograph. Perhaps it's a combination of a "heavy" running chronograph, and a not strong enough running work, both in desperate need of a proper service?

Which leads back to JohnR725 question above plus; what was the complain / reason when/that you got it?

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the forum. You're best starting with something that you know runs well and keeps good time. That way when you've stripped and service it, any problems are due to something you've done.
    • Welcome to the WRT-Forum! Sorry to say it, but you’re very likely to break or lose something when servicing a wristwatch for the first time — I’ve been there! So, if these watches have any value to you, don’t attempt to service them as a beginner.
    • In writing "shimming the staff" I was alluding to the idea trailed in the above referenced thread of inserting a hair along the staff which, as the discussion there covered,  could result in some eccentricity. By making a (more or less) complete cylinder I was hoping to avoid that problem. Don't tell anyone, but needing a very ductile metal to do this by manipulation at such a small scale, I used a piece of an empty Tomato pureé tube! It occurred to me that the material's ductility(?) would also put less stress on the RT in forming a sufficiently tight seal. Anyway, that's how I avoided the temptation to use glue. No doubt your punctuational response to this confession will be "!!!" !
    • Hi All. I would appreciate some advice for a complete newbie on getting into watch servicing - nothing serious,  just as a fun project. I've got a thing for hand-wound watches and would like to bring an old watch (or two) back to life, so looking to learn to do a strip-clean-oil-assemble cycle.   I've toyed with this idea in the past (years ago) and picked up a couple candidates to learn on, but never found the time for them.  One is an old Ingersoll, swiss-made 17 jewels. It seems to wind and tick. Casing, dial, glass are in great shape, so looks like a good candidate to me for the first service. The other is a Benrus DR23. It winds and makes a few reluctant ticks, but then seems to stop. Casing looks like a complete gonner, and the dial is in pretty poor shape too. If the movement is not broken and just needs a service, I wonder if there's any possibility of getting a cheapo Chinese casing & dial to fit this movement in, or is it extremely unlikely to be the right size?   For a start, I want to strip & assemble a movement, perhaps a dozen times to build up the basic parts handling skills. I see that online advice is to buy a Chinese-made ST36 for this purpose. Can I just go at the Benrus or Ingersoll instead, or does it make more sense to get a cheap ST for this? Thank you.    
    • Hi,  I have this vintage Navitimer 806 with a bezel that plays a little bit as shown in this video: https://imgur.com/a/2NjdiF0 How would you fix this? I don't see where a gasket would fit for instance. Also, it seems this issue happens sometimes with older Navitimers.  Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...