Jump to content

Miyota 82S5 Technical Document


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, kd8tzc said:

I was hoping  to get an exploded view if possible

the problem with most technical literature is it came into existence to help you to find spare parts. Then even technical literature that has servicing information may not have been scanned when someone was scanning these documents a very long time ago.  In other words all those PDFs add up to a lot of size and in the early days people didn't have that much size of hard drives. then there's the other problem of its assume that people know how to service watches so the technical aspects may have never been scanned for that reason. Then yes I've actually seen some of the cousins document where if you have the physical copy its 20 pages but all they have is two or three pages of a parts list.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks JohnR and that sort of makes sense.  I like it so I can see what I am getting into.  At first I liked it also for what to oil something with, but that ended up confusing me more (with the Seiko one) as you guys have some great advice on what to oil with what on this side (thick oil on slow moving high torque, and thin oil on fast moving low torque).  Taken with that and what Mark shows in his training video, I largely ignore the oil items.

It's funny as I bought a Luch 2209 and it has the part list, but I highly doubt you can find parts for that any longer.  That's one of the watches that I will attempt in a few days as it came to me filthy.  I might want to get a donor movement for it though as I'm a little concerned about the strange shock spring it has on it.  I have a picture of that in a different post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, kd8tzc said:

Luch 2209

I have the Google out because I didn't recognize the name. Interesting watch in that there seems to be a lot of references to it. found the parts list which at least would indicate that at one time parts may have been a available somewhere on the planet. Which is better than not finding a parts list which is not good at all.

That if you do a search on this group I saw the references that other people of worked on the watch.

 

3595_Poljot 2209.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Excellent advice!  Mainspring winders are generally a nightmare. In order to be absolutely sure that they work, they must be adapted for specific calibres. Sure, you can build up a collection of winders over time, but it's expensive and time-consuming and you still can't be sure that any of the ones you have in your collection will fit. When I was new, I considered buying Bergeon's large universal set because I thought it would cover all situations, but that's not the case. The risks of hand winding a mainspring are often exaggerated. With the right technique and training, the risks are not much greater than with a winder. Moreover, if the spring has a T-shaped bridle, you may not even get it into the barrel. Here is an excellent description by a professional how to hand wind: Yes, a well-established practice among professional repairers is to always replace the spring even when it is in good condition. Personally, I think it is an unnecessary cost because modern springs last a very long time. Some fatigue occurs over time but if you are unsure, you can always test the power reserve. It is also an unnecessary risk to replace a spring if it is still in good condition. If an original spring is not available, it is not certain that the alloy in a generic spring corresponds to the properties of the original spring. This seems to be particularly true for some Japanese movements, especially Seiko and Orient. For any Swiss movement, I'd say the risk is non-existent.
    • I had a similar problem with a chinese set - with that, I drilled the drum out to take the slightly larger arbor; it only needed about 0.2mm increase so no detriment when using the original arbor. (One was LH the other was RH, in that case).
    • There is a tool to straighten this, but it will cost you 50x this wheel.
    • The devil's creation. They peeled off very easily, yeah no not recommended. 
    • You have a very low chance of straightening this, it should be made of hardened steel, which is very brittle. Maybe you could ask for a refund from the place where you bought it? If you go ahead and try to straighten it and it breaks then nobody will refund you.
×
×
  • Create New...