Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/11/2023 at 7:39 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

Please confirm that you have done this.

The behavior you describe is indeed strange.

Check the end and side shake of the fork.  Is it possible you have a broken pivot?  That would allow the pallet fork to angle down toward the plate and miss the jewel.  But this would be evident if you did the pallet "click" test shown in the video.

What is this "Click test" that you speak of?

 

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, MCBwatchrepair said:

What is this "Click test" that you speak of?

 

Haven't followed this too closely and I don't think "click test" is consensus terminology and should possibly be called a "flip test" as that's what is said in the mentioned video. See at 25:23.

 

Edited by VWatchie
Posted
36 minutes ago, MCBwatchrepair said:

What is this "Click test" that you speak of?

 

Its just a snapping back and forth of the lever, it indicates that the lever is receiving the power thats travelled through the train from the mainspring barrel. Using tweezers is not a great idea unless you have very good movement control, a small artist's paintbrush could save you some broken lever part heartache. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Its just a snapping back and forth of the lever

AKA "pallet fork" (if anyone should be feeling confused).

On 2/17/2023 at 2:59 PM, JohnFrum said:

The Sep 1995 issue of the Horological Times has two articles on hairspring manipulation by Archie Perkins and Henry Fried. The October 1995 issue has the second part of Fried’s article.

https://www.awci.com/wp-content/uploads/ht/1995/1995-09-web.pdf

https://www.awci.com/wp-content/uploads/ht/1995/1995-10-web.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

AKA "pallet fork" (if anyone should be feeling confused).

Thanks watchie, sorry i prefer to use the traditional terms. I think of the pallets as the end that holds the jewels that engage the escape teeth and the fork as the end that engages the roller and impulse jewel. Lever sometimes called the anchor I just think of it as a good idea to learn all the variations of names, they vary from country to country and generation to generation. I sometimes bracket the name with a common variation used. The habit comes from my joinery background, i was taught by old school joiners that apprenticed in the 30s and 40s

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thanks watchie, sorry i prefer to use the traditional terms.

No worries! I only commented since we're in the forum "New to watch repair ** Safe Zone For Learner Watch Repairers **" forum. I remember my first year being constantly confused over terminology. I still remember trying to figure out the difference between the "motion works" and the "dial train" only to discover at long length they're the same 😆 And, you're right, to facilitate communication it's a good idea to learn the various names for the same thing. 

On 2/17/2023 at 2:59 PM, JohnFrum said:

The Sep 1995 issue of the Horological Times has two articles on hairspring manipulation by Archie Perkins and Henry Fried. The October 1995 issue has the second part of Fried’s article.

This got me curious to see if I could find more issues of the magazine and I did!

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

No worries! I only commented since we're in the forum "New to watch repair ** Safe Zone For Learner Watch Repairers **" forum. I remember my first year being constantly confused over terminology. I still remember trying to figure out the difference between the "motion works" and the "dial train" only to discover at long length they're the same 😆 And, you're right, to facilitate communication it's a good idea to learn the various names for the same thing. 

I just assume that if someone didn't know what was being said that they ask about it. Thats what i would do, in some way i think if you ask you are more inclined to remember than if you were told. Goes back to the same principle that you can tell someone something until you are blue in face, it generally wont sink in. Only when they say it themselves out loud do they realise and accept it. A lot of folk have the inherent idea that they dont like to be told anything, a good way to win an argument when someone is at fault is to draw them into having them say the issue out loud. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I just assume that if someone didn't know what was being said that they ask about it. Thats what i would do

That's what I do too. Still, I think most people won't for fear of making a fool out of themselves. It takes a lot of confidence to stick your chin out, especially when you know the question may be wrong or irrelevant. I have worked as a teacher for many years and one of the biggest challenges is to get people to stop me talking whenever they have a question. As long as the question grinds in their heads, they don't hear a word of what I say. This is also why I am adamant about announcing and keeping time for breaks even if I have to stop in the middle of a sentence. If, for example, you need to make an important call or just need to go to the toilet, you are guaranteed to think about when you will have a break instead of focusing on the teaching.

8 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Goes back to the same principle that you can tell someone something until you are blue in face, it generally wont sink in.

Tell me all about it! 🤣 When I say to the class three times in a row "This is crucially important, without the following information you won't pass the examination and you will possibly be terminated from the program" at least one student out of 25 or so will somehow miss it. Communication is the most crucial activity to reach any kind of success in life and it's also one of the most difficult.

One sacred principle to stick to as a teacher is "Don't answer a question that was never asked". Still, I often find it difficult to adhere to this principle. I guess it's the teacher in me who just has a hard time keeping my mouth shut, so I guess that's why I couldn't help myself with the lever/pallet fork comment.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

so I guess that's why I couldn't help myself with the lever/pallet fork comment.

You were catering for everyone.  I can go along with that some dont want to ask for fear of embarrassment, something that clearly doesnt bother me. You may notice i dont ask about much, if i see something i dont understand it gives me the opportunity to dive into a book. Its usually when i have an idea and want feedback if it could work. I'll certainly take on board your advice and include more popular names and terms. I think we are of the same ilk ( I'll let you google that one yourself 😆 ) and like to be asked questions, I've employed quite a few apprentices over the years and enjoyed explaining and teaching them.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...