Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just measured the ones in my Marshall/Moseley a couple days ago so I could tell a buddy what they were, and it mic'ed at a couple thou under 3/16" (specifically .184" to .185")
I assume it's to fit a .187" bore in the frame with some slip. You could lathe polish (emery or whatever) some 3/16 to fit a staking frame I'd think.

Edited by Vinito
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

The vast majority of staking tools use 4.7mm punches, including U.S. makes. 3/16" is 4.762mm, that extra 0.06mm is enough that it won't fit.

That explains something that's puzzled me.  I have an old Boley and Leinen - the stakes measure 4.67mm. But I have 2 which won't quite fit, they measure 4.73mm - annoying.

So, the Bergeon stakes, which are listed as 4.7mm - is that the diameter of the stake, or the size of the hole they fit ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

That explains something that's puzzled me.  I have an old Boley and Leinen - the stakes measure 4.67mm. But I have 2 which won't quite fit, they measure 4.73mm - annoying.

So, the Bergeon stakes, which are listed as 4.7mm - is that the diameter of the stake, or the size of the hole they fit ?

I just checked a handful of punches from my Star, they are all between 4.68mm to 4.70 spot on, mostly spot on. Some K&D punches I have measure exactly 4.70mm (well, a couple were 4.705mm).

I checked a couple of Star frames, a Favorite, and a Seitz (they did make staking tools too), with plug gages; the Stars and Seitz have 4.73mm holes, the Favorite has 4.72mm.

 

The modern staking tool was invented in the U.S. in the 1870s; they did like to use things like "Stubs steel wire gage" a lot back then. Stubs #12 is 0.185", or 4.699mm. I'm guessing they somewhat arbitrarily settled on Stubs #12 as the punch size. The stump locating end, that's another matter, being 4mm (except for some oddballs that are 4.5mm or 5mm).

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, praezis said:

The assumption that all sizes have to match the inch grid is a funny one (for the rest of the world at least) 🙂

Frank

As I understand it the punch diameter was originated in the U.S., which is pretty "inchy". Though in the watch industry it was a mix of inch and metric. It's just an odd diameter; why not 5mm? Thus the head scratching. Just as a lot of things in metric world stick to whole mms or some logical jumps, a lot of things in inch world stick to some fractional size. The 4.7 punch diameter does't fit a fractional size- but it does fit the Stubs steel wire gage, haha.

 

Now maybe I'm misinformed of the punch diameter origin (I read it in a 1910 book by K&D), but even if it was from mainland Europe, why such an odd size?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a bit maddening that they are so close but no cigar. When I was gathering up my first watchmaking tools I made what I thought was a great deal on a full set of old but unused stakes made by GF. But I may have found out why there weren't that many bidders when I unpacked them and realized they wouldn't fit the K&D staking tool that I had already bought, being one of the outlier sizes at ~4.77mm. Didn't fit the WestLake tool I had either, but that did give me an excuse to keep looking and later buy an incomplete GF set which was configured to allow use of the stakes as stumps in a reverso-type manner so it all worked out in the end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose the .002" difference (.1875" to .185")would be frustrating if you just wanted and needed a working staking set to do the watch work and get on with it. One could either modify a pile of stakes to fit their staking frame or modify the bore of their tool to fit their stakes.

I am kinda warped though because I have a long history of making tools and tinkering in the machine shop, so I see even making stakes from scratch as kind of a fun challenge. My reflex is to wonder and wail at why anyone mechanically inclined doesn't feel the same way, but if I simply take a short step back to consider other perspectives, I totally get it. I have a problem thinking I have enough time to do all these projects in the brief amount of time we have in one life, and I have at least five lifetimes of projects queued up as it is. It's a problem, and I understand that when you guys just want the tool to do the job, you don't feel like constantly reinventing the wheel.

BUT, if my simply mentioning that it can be done prompts anyone to dive in for a try (if you have the time), maybe this post was worth making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not too hard to find 4.7mm tool steel here (in Switzerland at least), but in the U.S. I remember getting some 0.185" from MSC back in the day. They've gone to the birds, but I see McMaster Carr has it, $6.57 for a 3 foot length of O1 precision ground steel. O1 is a great steel for home shop toolmaking, and about perfect for staking punches. Starting with the right diameter, it's simple and fast to drill and shape the end for whatever use needed, and you only need to harden the very end, so that's simple and fast too.

 

I keep some 4.7 on hand just for making oddball punches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am not sure for the terms in english, but if I directly translate from Bulgarian or Russian, there are 'magnetic soft' and 'magnetic hard' magnetic materials. The first group will not get magnetised, thow they will be attracted by magnets. The soft iron for example. The second group, like hardened steel, will get magnetised. So non magnetic hairspring aloys belong to the first group.
    • Looks like it is only dirt. If rust, then this means the strenght of the spring is reduced in places with rust, so the spring is damaged and useless. Only light surface rust, which is rather residual from other places activity of rust can be cleaned, and no chemicals that can etch the metals of the spring aloy should be used
    • Hello, I'm after some help on getting a functional tool for removing and replacing case tubes, the friction fit type not the threaded type. I have previously owned two Chinese Ali Express tools, which worked, but in each case after using on a watch case with an angle the watch had to be manually held perpendicular and when this angle was not perfectly aligned the pusher pin inevitably received a slight side load and the tool body was damaged. Due to the fact that the hole which holds the pusher pin is so close to the end of the block and the material wall is so thin: The result was that the hard pusher pin stretched and deformed the hole and the pusher pin was then slack and no longer perpendicular, and eventually the material split altogether. After I looked at the tool I realised that the block the hole was machined into was aluminum, this coupled with the extremely thin wall made this hole very weak and prone to the deformation and damage I had experienced. I looked to another reputable supplier (see below) who advertised their tool as "all steel" and I even contacted their customer support who confirmed that the block in question was made of steel. I was very disappointed yesterday when it arrived and found that it was in fact aluminum and not steel as promised. I could tell by the feel of the material (weight) and confirmed with a magnet which would not 'stick' and have since requested a return/refund. Assuming the return/refund goes smoothly, I am still left with my original problem of not having a tube pusher tool - does anyone have any recommendation for a tool which will work and will also stand the test of time?
    • Drilling is going to be difficult, firstly because the drill bits are so thin and brittle, expect to break a few. The second issue is access to the 'hole', as the other lug will be in the way, meaning that you will have to drill at a slight angle, putting a bending stress on the drill bit and with the slightest drop in concentration .... and back to my first point. I would be tempted to grind them flat with a Dremel type tool or small jewelers file, and then put a center punch in the center of the bit to be drilled so the drill bit doesn't skip around and break... but expect this to be slow and frustrating work. By the time you have done 4 of these you'll be an expert and can come back and tell us all the best way to do it if you go down this route. However, I would seriously consider What @watchweasol said and drill from the outside-in, this will ensure straight holes without having to work around the other lugs. It may be worthwhile making yourself a simple paper template so you can be sure to match the position of each hole before drilling. In the end you will be left with 4 holes on the outside of the lugs, but many cases are made this way and unless you are looking for it you probably won't notice or realise that it's not the way the watch was meant to be in the first place.
    • What works for me (waiting for the villagers to assemble with torches and pitchforks) is to put a liberal (in watch terms) spot of 9010 on one of the pins of the pin pallet, this seems to improve amplitude and beat error.
×
×
  • Create New...