Jump to content

ETA 12836 runs very well after service, but with extremely low amplitude


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

As the subject states, I'm having an odd problem with an ETA 12836 movement I just serviced. It runs steadily with an excellent trace on the timegraph, but with very low amplitude (175-190). It also doesn't appear to usually start running when the watch is wound; it takes a little shake or nudge of the balance wheel to get it going, but once it's going it runs consistently and smoothly.

I have disassembled the entire wheel train and re-cleaned them to be sure I didn't over-oil. I checked that the mainspring barrel was seated correctly. I removed the top balance jewels, soaked the entire balance in one-dip and reassembled with a fresh drop of oil, and the watch shows absolutely no improvement. I have also tried demagnetizing to no effect.

The movement and wheel train all seem to be in great shape as is the balance. When given a puff with an air blower the balance oscillates very freely, continuing to move down to a very small increment.

In the course of the service I replaced the mainspring with a brand new one from a reputable (I think?) dealer (watchmaterial.com). I greased the barrel wall in six places with 8217 before installing the mainspring.

I am really at a loss as to why the amplitude is so low. Is there something I'm overlooking here?

Thanks a lot!

EDIT: I should add that visually the balance runs true and snappy, but it does appear to have a very short arc.

PXL_20230114_002335621.jpg

Edited by cortman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, dadistic said:

A movement requiring a shake to start is an indication that the watch is very far out of beat.  Your timegrapher may not be giving you good information. 

Oh that's a very good point that I hadn't even thought of. Makes a lot of sense. I'm going to play with that a bit and report back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dadistic said:

A movement requiring a shake to start is an indication that the watch is very far out of beat.  Your timegrapher may not be giving you good information. 

But looking at his timegrapher trace, his beat error is zero. Could be a dirty balance of pallet fork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that you did check the wheel train and balance wheel, so that they're all good, the train runs with almost no friction and the balance oscillates very freely. Timgrapher shows stable running means the escapement is ok. At this point I think the problem could be some where in the mainspring barrel. I once had a case that the watch runs at low amplitude because a previous watchmaker damaged the barrel lid putting it back in using tweezer. Basically the lid got bent inward and it was rubbing against the mainspring. I bent the lid back to flat and that solved the amplitude problem. You did replace the mainspring with a new one from a reputable dealer so the mainspring height should be right, but check for that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the balance spin if you remove the escape wheel and give the balance a puff of air? The balance should be able to move the pallet fork from side to side without much resistance. However if the impulse jewel or the pallet fork horn is dirty you could lose a lot of amplitude there. I had an ETA 2472 with very low amplitude that was solved by properly cleaning the horn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just closing the loop on this one- the mainspring slipped off the arbor, and in the process of re-shaping it to catch it broke- so I got an entirely new mainspring/arbor/barrel assembly (only a couple dollars more than just a mainspring, surprisingly) and after installation and reassembly, I'm getting 290 degrees right away. It appears the mainspring was probably not correct for this watch (boo, watchmaterial!).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What works for me (waiting for the villagers to assemble with torches and pitchforks) is to put a liberal (in watch terms) spot of 9010 on one of the pins of the pin pallet, this seems to improve amplitude and beat error.
    • Non-magnetic is a poor description of such a hairspring. A better description would be unmagnetisable hairspring. There are metals and alloys that are attracted to magnets, but don’t become magnetised themselves. A hairspring made out such a material will be attracted to magnetised tweezers, but will not become magnetised. These hairsprings can be disrupted by being in close proximity to a magnet, but the disruption will cease the moment the magnet is moved away. These are hairsprings that could conceivably be disrupted by a magnetised hairspring stud. Best Regards, Mark
    • More than enough. Here's mine at the height I work at. I think the working distance with the included 0.5x Barlow lens is about 9".   So yes, that halves the magnification. The full story is the objective lens goes from 0.7x to 4.5x. The eyepieces are 10x, giving you the advertised magnification of 7x-45x. However the working distance is unacceptably short, so it comes with an 0.5x Barlow lens, reducing the magnification range to 3.5x-22.5x, but giving you a good working distance. What I did was buy a pair of Extreme Widefield 20x Eyepieces for when I need more magnification. You keep your high working distance, but get your 45x magnification back, at the cost of some width of field.
    • Modern ones after blue steel, invar, elinvar and nivarox , the shiny one are not supposed to become magnetised. But i have had them jump to tweezers. And i dont really understand the comment that what can be magnetised is the stud carrier and rate regulator and they can attract the hairspring ? If the hairspring is non magnetic then how can it be attracted to something else thats become magnetise, its non magnetic , that doesn't really make sense to be ?
    • Does it say 17 jewels on the dial or on the movement ?
×
×
  • Create New...