Jump to content

Chinese vs Swiss tools and sundries


Recommended Posts

I have always wherever possible supported UK supply houses. However for the first time I ventured to “AliExpress” a Chinese based company. 

As a tester I ordered a lubrication oil stand what looked visually the same as I recently purchased from Cousins UK.

See pics below. The top one is purchased from Cousins the lower is the one purchased from “ AliExpress”

I can report both are identical in build apart from the “ AliExpress” has different coloured lids.

The difference is price.

Cousins including postage £28.94

AliExpress including tax and import tax £17.94

I do not know what the answer is but these savings for an amateur are worth considering. However the down sides are: 

It was 4 weeks + before delivery. 

Be aware Chinese tools have been reviewed many times and reported in the BHI mag and there is a difference. The biggest difference is the quality of metals used by the Chinese. Also their horological tools are just not built as precisely as the Swiss tools.

But for a keen amateur well worth a punt IMO
12E9CFD0-F670-4C40-BCB5-189F2CC6E0D8.thumb.jpeg.08a635d6d0e6fed803dad359e73f0033.jpeg

Edited by clockboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other side is that some tools that are claimed to be made in Switzerland are actually made in China and packed in made in Switzerland boxes.

Some (but not all) Chinese tools look identical because they are identical.

Sometimes the savings are huge but sometimes it's not enough to justify the wait for the delivery, wait 4 weeks to save £5 maybe not but wait 4 weeks to save over £800, then yes every time.

You do have to be careful as the Chinese are prone to copy their own output and not quite get the quality right, but if you find a good seller a fortune can be saved.

Don't be fooled by the Swiss watch industry they can be quite a shady bunch at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been stated on many occasions on this forum that the Swiss use China to make their tools. However I have not found any proof but it is plausible for sure. One example tested by the BHI was the Seitz jeweling tool compared to the Chinese clone. They certainly look the same but under tests they are not of the same quality in terms of build quality and materials used. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, clockboy said:

This has been stated on many occasions on this forum that the Swiss use China to make their tools. However I have not found any proof but it is plausible for sure. One example tested by the BHI was the Seitz jeweling tool compared to the Chinese clone. They certainly look the same but under tests they are not of the same quality in terms of build quality and materials used. 

Could you scan a copy of the BHI article that compares the two jeweling tools? I’ve heard of that article mentioned a number of times, but have not found the article online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have issues scanning the BHI mag pages. Conversation to rtf text files does not work for me. Probably because my iMac is old (2011) and the softwares available will not download on my ancient mac.  The other issue I have to be careful of is as a member of BHI I could be in trouble with the BHI for copyright.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You won't find any evidence of their practices, they are too careful for that.

But buy a couple of their tools and a couple of the Chinese identical tools and do a comparison, they not only look like they came out of the same factory, same machining marks etc but the parts are also fully interchangeable, even the packaging is often the same. Just remember the Chinese are quite capable of high quality production that could easily put western factories to shame, which is why so many companies have their products made their.  It used to be because of price now it's because of the quality of the products they are quite capable of producing.

The likes of Bergeon may make many of their tools but they don't make them all. Their catalogues are too vast compared to their factory size, especially given that most of their published location is not all factory but mainly warehousing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, markr said:

Here is my cheap and dusty Chinese  case back opener.  Looks like they reached into the wrong box when putting it together.IMG_5249.thumb.JPG.5d40f2c3a74b71db5b87c1405105f7d1.JPG

IMG_5250 (1).JPG

Under Bergeon it says Swiss made.

Haha that confirms it then. No bergeon for me 😉

46 minutes ago, markr said:

Here is my cheap and dusty Chinese  case back opener.  Looks like they reached into the wrong box when putting it together.IMG_5249.thumb.JPG.5d40f2c3a74b71db5b87c1405105f7d1.JPG

IMG_5250 (1).JPG

Under Bergeon it says Swiss made.

Head of Bergeon tool developments --  " can we stop selling our tools to the Chinese please they keep copying them, look theres another one of our parts thats turned up ". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Paul80 said:

You won't find any evidence of their practices, they are too careful for that.

But buy a couple of their tools and a couple of the Chinese identical tools and do a comparison, they not only look like they came out of the same factory, same machining marks etc but the parts are also fully interchangeable, even the packaging is often the same. Just remember the Chinese are quite capable of high quality production that could easily put western factories to shame, which is why so many companies have their products made their.  It used to be because of price now it's because of the quality of the products they are quite capable of producing.

The likes of Bergeon may make many of their tools but they don't make them all. Their catalogues are too vast compared to their factory size, especially given that most of their published location is not all factory but mainly warehousing.

Oh dear . Must say the Chinese movements for sure have improved in quality and basic tools as well. But there is a difference with certainly with the precision tools such as for jeweling.  When time I will find the BHI article and quote some of their findings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @dibs1 Hopefully you see this and post an update. @Knebo Would you happen to know what is the end-shake tolerance for a cal 15xx rotor or is there such a metric? Also, is there a specified height of the rotor?   I got the watch serviced which addressed the rotor grinding against the base plate and case back (i have checked by moving the watch in a circular motion to spin the rotor and have tested it dial up and down) however whenever the watch is shaken lightly the rotor touches the caseback and makes a ding. What is unusual is that is only happens when the rotor is resting at the 9'o clock position. The axle was replaced and reading around it seems that  spring clip, jewel and axel are the three parts that individually or together are causing this issue.
    • Yes, barrel size.  A 11mm spring will push out into a 11mm barrel, no need to go 0.5mm smaller. 
    • Hello All, I’m looking for advice about how to interpret the mainspring specs described in the GR documents and in the catalogues of online sellers such as cousins.  My problem relates to interpreting the value describing barrel size - I’m unsure what the last number REALLY refers to.   For example: 1.10x.0105x360x11  (This refers to GR2628-X) Does the “ 11 “ here refer to the barrel inside diameter of the calibre OR to the diameter of the wound mainspring before insertion? For example if my measured barrel inside diameter to 11mm, I would normally select a wound spring size a little smaller, say 10.5, wouldn’t I?  Or, does the barrel diameter described in the catalogue specifications take that into account and I would therefore order a catalogue size 11 for an 11mm barrel ID? Hope this makes sense. I can’t find clarification of this anywhere. Many thanks for any enlightenment. Cheers, John
    • Let's say, like in a watch, you have  a 70 tooth 4th wheel, which needs to make a turn in one minute, with an 18,000 beat escapement. 15 tooth escape wheel as usual, and a 7 tooth pinion on it.   70 x 15 x 2 /  = 300  That's 300 beats, and there are 5 beats per second, so divide and you get 60s, one minute- all is well. If we do 70 x 15 x 2 / 8 that equals 262.5. With an 18K balance, which will let the escape wheel move one turn in 6 seconds, the 4th wheel will have made like 1.14 turns. So the time display is running fast. But this comes to like 7.5 seconds over per minute, which is about double your gain (maybe I'm wrong- I'm mathing on my phone while writing on my phone 😄) but pretty sure the gain is more than you are observing.   A possible culprit is that crown/4th wheel isn't running true, and a tooth is slipping past a pinion leaf once per revolution. I've seen this. If the platform is original and it's a nice piece they are often pinned, so the depthing isn't an issue. If the platform isn't pinned, check the depthing. And at any rate check the crown wheel between centeres and make sure the teeth are running true.
    • Fast responses - thank you. Yes, I mentioned the 18000bph to illustrate that it's not a matter of touching coils, over banking, shortened hairspring etc. I even took off the platform and temporarily fitted a another NOS one also with 8 leaves and beating 18000 but the colossal gain is the same. I'm resigned to buying and fitting a new Gorge platform plus a 7 leaf pinion escape wheel but only if I think it will work; otherwise it's a waste of £200 and a couple of hours work. Hence the underlying question is: all other things being equal, what would the timekeeping effect be? Is it a simple 7/8ths as fast? Logic tells me it is but can it be that linear?
×
×
  • Create New...