Jump to content

Could this Hamilton be all original?


Recommended Posts

Hello! I just finished servicing this Hamilton 974 movement. When I went to do more research on the complete watch I got a little stumped.

It appears that the case is a "Mainliner" case but from what I've gathered these cases were used on railroad grade movements. At first I figured this was a variant of the Traffic line of Hamilton pocket watches but now I'm not sure.

To add a little mystery, the case is engraved 1942, however the serial number dates to approximately 1918. The case style also implies it was made late 1930s-early 40s.

I have heard that during the war years they were sometimes casing whatever movements they had on hand because their production went to the war effort, but it seems like a large age gap. Could this be the case with this watch?

In addition to that, during servicing (I bought at at an antique fair) the case was almost impossible to open and when I did there was a bunch of oxidation in between the threads, which leads me to believe it's been left alone for quite a while.

 

Thank you for whatever knowledge and insight you can provide! 

PXL_20221025_120647840.jpg

PXL_20221025_120651201.jpg

PXL_20221025_120724209.jpg

PXL_20221025_120729507.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did you know if you went back early enough in American pocket watches that the movement almost never came in a case. You go to the jewelry store the movements would be in one display case the cases would be somewhere else you got to pick and choose.

then there is the other problem between now in 1918 is quite a long time if for unknown reasons somebody decided they didn't like their case arose worn-out odes or whatever there's nothing to prevent you from swapping to another case. Often times you look a pocket watches and you can see other casings screws now that's a definite giveaway that the case was used for another watch. So basically all it means is between when it was made and when you've got it somebody put it in a new case.

7 hours ago, Max50916 said:

In addition to that, during servicing (I bought at at an antique fair) the case was almost impossible to open and when I did there was a bunch of oxidation in between the threads, which leads me to believe it's been left alone for quite a while.

this by the way is a very good thing. Thoroughly oils tended to be organic oils they would go bad with time the watch would come to a nice safe stop and not disintegrate by just running forever without lubrication. So if you're lucky somebody will take great grandpa's watch put it in the sock drawer and it's been sitting there for the last hopefully a very long time of years then all your watch needs is cleaning possibly a mainspring.because the unfortunate reality of a watch that's been running continuously is probably didn't get normal servicing which in the early days would've been yearly and things start to wear out so it's much nicer if it's all gummed up and not running

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

john nailed it. 

have you looked on the pocketwatchdatabase.com ? They have tons of info, including your case serial number. That case was originally patented in 1859 and was given to James Boss, the inventor of the process by which he made it. Keystone would make this style using his patented methods and then stamp J Boss style under the Keystone brand.  they have too much stuff to list here. I did read a copy of his original patent tho. very interesting. the case may or may not have railroad grade stamped on it. 974 isn't a railroad grade but it still a very nice piece. I have one in guild the other plain nickel but really nice damaskeening. Just picled up a Bunn Special thats on it's way.

yours looks really good.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
    • When faced with say a pocket watch bridge which is cracked, silver soldering to repair is often the only option (hopefully someone wasn't there before hand with soft solder). I can generally do this succesfully and tidily with a small torch and miniscule pieces of silver solder, but on parts which were mercury amalgam gilded the heat can have have a deleterious effect on the finish.   I keep wondering if there's a good way to refinish these - and despite having the needful items would rather avoid using the mercury process.   In the past for electronic work I've gold plated PCBs but this involved gold potassium cyanide solution, which also doesn't realy belong at home. I've read that there are now safer alternatives but couldn't find more detail (and importantly how similar are the results to amalgam gilding, since I wouldn't want to refinish the whole watch). Pointers would be very welcome (and yes, I know solutions containing gold won't be cheap!) Alan
×
×
  • Create New...