Jump to content

Damage to the barrel bridge - leave or repair?


Recommended Posts

I've had an old 1914 trench watch sitting in a box for a few months. It runs intermittently and is filthy so today I thought I'd strip it down for cleaning. I've just picked up a nice condition National MK VR so this watch will be the guinea pig.

The movement is an unidentified Fontainemelon, which is referred to as Fontainmelon 2 on David Boettcher's website Watch Movement Identification .

A few small battles stripping it down; the cannon pinion stuck as though epoxied on was the worst part. Whilst giving the parts a pre-clean I noticed something strange on the barrel bridge. It looks as though something in the keyless works, most probably the clutch, has worn through the bridge under the crown wheel. I can't see any noticeable marks on the crown wheel but this wear must have been happening for years. The watch winds and the hands set though I did notice that the stem moves quite a bit as there is no stem tube in the case. 

As this is an old movement it's going to be nigh impossible to find parts. So, should I just leave as is or is a repair at all possible? The latter would be way outside of my ability so I would need to find someone to repair it. If the answer is 'don't bother' I may just take that sharpness off. Secondly, should there be a case tube on this old silver case?

Oh, and the four deep scratches that you can see are replicated on the main plate and the inside of the barrel!

IMG_0625.jpg

IMG_0626.jpg

IMG_0628.jpg

Edited by SpringMangler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worn through area won't hurt anything, and a repair would be extremely difficult and almost certainly resort to soldering metal and remachining, which is kind of hokey (soldering) and a lot of work (machining).

 

What has happened is the stem has worn the bearing area* at the edge of the bridge and quite certainly on the mainplate as well. That's the play you've noticed. The solution is to make a new stem with a larger diameter there so that it has minimal play. Not a big job for someone accustomed to it.

 

*When installing a crown most folks will hold the stem in a pinvice on this portion (the bearing nearest the thread). If the pinvise has hard steel jaws and they are of the pointy type, it will likely dig in and raise up 4 little teeth which will certainly eat away at these areas over the coming years of winding. It's important to make sure the pinvice does not damage the stem (I always hold the stem in the lathe or in a pinvice that takes lathe collets).

 

But a regular old stem with no damage can eventually wear these parts too. The solution is still the same.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When reassembling, try and see if you can support the stem at the edge of the movement, where the stem enters the movement. This will help to stabilise the stem and avoid further damage. A bit of copper/brass is easy to work into a tube and you can probably epoxy it in place. Hell, even a piece of plastic sheathing like the bit around an electrical wire will be better than nothing as I don't think this watch will be worn on a daily basis. The idea is to avoid further damage.

Also the case may need a crown tube as that also helps stabilise the stem/case/movement interface.

Anilv

Edited by anilv
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...