Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LeCorbusier said:

Yes I have a staking set ... The setting lever looks very similar ... but it doesn't have the spring at all.

I will see if I can extract dims from the staff and take it from there I think ... if it doesn't match I can always search for one that does I suppose.

This is the main reason i will be learning to repivot a staff. Much practise will be needed i am sure. At 55 I'm expecting to have the skill and technique down by full retirement age. My eyesight will then be too crap to use that skill 🙄 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it will certainly be an interesting challenge ... no idea how things will go ... but currently its broken so apart from trashing the new staff (assuming I can track down an appropriate one) I can't really make matters worse. Re-studding the hair spring and fabricating the wedge pin was a similar challenge and one which I would rather not do very often.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I am coming back to this after putting away for a while to take stock. I am still trying to work out how to get the dims of the right balance staff with the pivots broken. My current plan is to remove the cap jewel from the cock and take a measurement from the cock to the face side of the plate and then subtract the thickness of the plate cap jewel. That should in theory give an accurate dim  from face of jewel to face of jewel ... am concerned that it doesn't allow for end shake tho. any thoughts or advice on this would be appreciated. I was then going to see what was catalogued at Balancestaffs.com and see if there is a match for an AS staff and what ligne that would compare to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have two Seitz sets, one ancient (with the 3mm anvils) and one just old (with 4mm anvils) plus a collection of spare pushers of assorted vintage. Not one of them is marked with it's size. Something which I have found very irritating when I have been using the tool and not returning pushers to their correct place in the tray every time as it means that I have to get the calipers out and measure them. These were bought as sets and collectively I have over 100 pushers so it would seem highly unlikely (if not inconceivable) that they are all cheap knock offs, especially as they are old enough to pre-date the prevalence of the Chinese knock off industry (at least as applied to watch making tools). I therefore believe them to be original Seitz parts. And there is no numbering. The shape of the bottom of the pump pushers is the same as your photo. The only thing that may not be the same is that the slotted insert (looks like a screw but is in fact a bayonet) should be brass. Yours looks the same colour as the steel but that could just be the lighting.
    • The original database is available on iOS devices here: https://apps.apple.com/fi/app/ranfft-watch-movements-archive/id6502008939
    • I no longer have my set so I can't help anymore sorry. Many on here have the set as its a must have tool for watch making/ repair.
    • It needs to be stirred before use and that makes it feel a lot thinner than when in the bottle. Does it feel as thin as 9010 after stirring it? I guess not! Yes, it's strange! I don't know, but if it is on impact it would make sense.
    • Thanks, OH! I agree with you. I'm currently looking at them under magnification, and they are consistent in shape and form for each section (flat pushers, pump pushers, concave, reamers, etc.). Though, a few are in bad condition and need to be replaced.  Before I cancel the return I have already initiated on eBay, can any of our members check to see if there are inconsistencies in markings on their sets? Also, I have included a snapshot of the bottom of one of the pump pushers, which are very unique in shape.  Can someone tell me if the bottoms of their pump pushers match this photo?  I'm hoping that Seitz had some inconsistencies in manufacturing over the years regarding markings.  Crossing my fingers. I appreciate you guys. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...