Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Turtle said:

I bought a non-working watch and found that it has a detent escapement.  My first.  Is there anything I should know before attempting to service the watch?

Pictures would be nice  we love pictures on this group at least I love pictures I'd like to see Your detent  and the whole watch of course.. Then when you are purchasing the nonrunning watch  did you know it was a detent?

Is it a pivoted detent for spring detent?

Then what is the current condition of this watch?

Unfortunately there are cautions.  One of my friends used to work on chronometers and he would talk about the bad things. I also have a Hamilton chronometer that something bad happened before I got it..  The problem with the D10 escapement is  if the locking jewel  is no longer where it's supposed to be the escape wheel is free to spin.  It can spin really really fast and if anything gets in its way it breaks.  So in the case of my Hamilton the escape wheel teeth are all bent over  the pivots on the escape wheel and the balance are broken  and several jewels are broken..

I think it also want to be careful of setting the watch turning the hands back words. I'm not exactly an expert at this I'm just going by memory there is the possibility when the hands are set back words I think it actually says that on the chronometer  manual for the Hamilton there is a possibility of causing the escapement to unlock and bad things of course happen.

So basically he has had be really careful not to cause the escapement to unlock an inappropriate fashion and have the escape wheel spin and bad things.  Otherwise the really fascinating timepieces when the running

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Pictures would be nice  we love pictures on this group at least I love pictures I'd like to see Your detent  and the whole watch of course.. Then when you are purchasing the nonrunning watch  did you know it was a detent?

Is it a pivoted detent for spring detent?

Then what is the current condition of this watch?

Unfortunately there are cautions.  One of my friends used to work on chronometers and he would talk about the bad things. I also have a Hamilton chronometer that something bad happened before I got it..  The problem with the D10 escapement is  if the locking jewel  is no longer where it's supposed to be the escape wheel is free to spin.  It can spin really really fast and if anything gets in its way it breaks.  So in the case of my Hamilton the escape wheel teeth are all bent over  the pivots on the escape wheel and the balance are broken  and several jewels are broken..

I think it also want to be careful of setting the watch turning the hands back words. I'm not exactly an expert at this I'm just going by memory there is the possibility when the hands are set back words I think it actually says that on the chronometer  manual for the Hamilton there is a possibility of causing the escapement to unlock and bad things of course happen.

So basically he has had be really careful not to cause the escapement to unlock an inappropriate fashion and have the escape wheel spin and bad things.  Otherwise the really fascinating timepieces when the running

Yes, we definitely need photos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagining the detent and rest of the escapement is intact, the #1 thing is to let down all the power before removing the balance. If the watch has a fusee it probably has maintaining power so even if the barrel is let down there is still power on the fusee. So if it's not functioning, so you can't let it run down the maintaining power, block the train.

 

If you remove the balance with power on there's a strong chance of the escapement unlocking and running away, usually taking out the locking jewel and ruining the tips of the escape wheel, possibly breaking the detent if a spring detent, and possibly breaking escape pivots.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

he #1 thing is to let down all the power before removing the balance. If the watch has a fusee it probably has maintaining power so even if the barrel is let down there is still power on the fusee.

 

7 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

If you remove the balance with power on there's a strong chance of the escapement unlocking and running away, usually taking out the locking jewel and ruining the tips of the escape wheel, possibly breaking the detent if a spring detent, and possibly breaking escape pivots.

I always wondered if my friend was just being excessively cautious with the detents escapement's. Even though I have a Hamilton chronometer that all of this is happened to it. This is exactly what he was always saying so if we have a confirmation of extreme caution is needed for the escapement. Usually what they do is they block the balance wheel in shipments with something soft like a wedge of paper. Did you don't want the balance wheel spinning around all by itself what is not running or even in storage you want to make sure it's secure so it doesn't unlock. Then you just want to be extremely careful when you take the balance out with your perception that there is no power anywhere.

But it really be helpful to give us pictures before you taken apart and try not to push on the balance wheel at all resisted temptation of having the watch run

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...