Jump to content

Frankenstein movement?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

On the barrel bridge A60, on the train bridge 425, under the balance P356.

Microlist say the P is Peseux but ranfft doesn't list a 355. The movement does look like a  Phenix 355 though. 

Just so we're clear on the numbering schemes? A company selling you a watch will put their name on the dial. Oftentimes they put their name and/or number on the main plate in plain sight.

Then many times they purchase basically an OEM movement from another company. That other company will put their Markings usually under the balance wheel but not always. Then sometimes the purchasing company will remove that or modify the watch.

This means that you can end up with a lot of numbers on your watch that are all legitimate numbers. But possibly extremely unhelpful to figure out like if you're looking for parts because you need to figure out who action made the movement.

Then sites such as ranfft  Listing all those movements and that's only scratching the surface of the quantity of movements ever made.

This is where reference books like bestfit comes in handy. At one time the makers conveniently made all of the setting parts unique and if you have the right book you can look up the setting components in figure out what you have. So if you to watch with no markings at all and you knew the size you could go to the book and possibly figure out what you have. Or in this case we can use the book to verify what you have or have not.

Then if were really lucky we could get a parts list with pretty pictures like the PDF attached. I also have a link to a parts list we can look up which parts cross reference with what etc.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=PES_355

3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Phenix 355 though.

You'll also notice that I did include that in the images the setting parts don't match.

P.JPG

P page 142 setting parts identification.JPG

P3 55 other.JPG

P3 55.JPG

3180_Peseux 355,385.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Just so we're clear on the numbering schemes? A company selling you a watch will put their name on the dial. Oftentimes they put their name and/or number on the main plate in plain sight.

Then many times they purchase basically an OEM movement from another company. That other company will put their Markings usually under the balance wheel but not always. Then sometimes the purchasing company will remove that or modify the watch.

This means that you can end up with a lot of numbers on your watch that are all legitimate numbers. But possibly extremely unhelpful to figure out like if you're looking for parts because you need to figure out who action made the movement.

Then sites such as ranfft  Listing all those movements and that's only scratching the surface of the quantity of movements ever made.

This is where reference books like bestfit comes in handy. At one time the makers conveniently made all of the setting parts unique and if you have the right book you can look up the setting components in figure out what you have. So if you to watch with no markings at all and you knew the size you could go to the book and possibly figure out what you have. Or in this case we can use the book to verify what you have or have not.

Then if were really lucky we could get a parts list with pretty pictures like the PDF attached. I also have a link to a parts list we can look up which parts cross reference with what etc.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=PES_355

You'll also notice that I did include that in the images the setting parts don't match.

P.JPG

P page 142 setting parts identification.JPG

P3 55 other.JPG

P3 55.JPG

3180_Peseux 355,385.pdf 1.35 MB · 0 downloads

 

22 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  I haveattached the tech sheet for the peseux 355 so you can make a comparison with the balancs cock and plates not found on ton the phenix 355 yet.

3180_Peseux 355,385.pdf 1.39 MB · 0 downloads

It seems decent, bought as movement only £1.99 and running despite being filthy and clogged with fibres.  

What's your opinion on the movement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi The movement looks all there and when cleaned up will run ok tech sheets come from the material suppliers and the manufacturers a lot of the SWATCH group material is dealers only and watermarked to prevent copying some can be found on cousins site esslingers and others its a matter of searching  if you cant find any on yor particular watch just post it up some one will have a reference.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That looks familiar! I was recently given one with a very similar state case - but yours is not as bad as mine! I was advised the one I have had a gunmetal case and was supposed to have a blued finish - the inside back cover, the blue-black, is what the outside should be. To see if it is gunmetal or pewter, see if a magnet is attracted when near it, but I'd remove the movement first and demagnetise afterwards. This is the one I did, as much an experiment as a definite solution; just don't use the boiling part, as this did not do anything useful other than wreck the old pan I used.     The cracks in an enamelled dial can apparently be made invisible with denture cleaner, though I've not tried that myself.  
    • if you're in watch repair long enough you'll find all sorts of strange and interesting things. unfortunately this morning I can't quite remember a very peculiar Seiko I once worked on. I was working in a shop in downtown Seattle and in the early days all the watch stuff was basically around one particular part of the city and the raw so within basically across the street from each other three watch material houses. It made it really easy to get parts when you're doing watch work psychiatric quite remember the peculiar Seiko watch where the movement went into a plastic ring and I think it was sandwiched between one or two pieces of the metal case. The crown fit on a plastic tube that was part of the ring so basically it's all destroyed disassembly you had to have a brand-new one to put it back together. so I went downstairs and asked and got one plastic I think was called the gasket even though it was rigid plastic with the tube for the crown. How do curiosity I remember asking and he had a whole bag of them at least 100 of them slim must've been popular at one time. But it does bring up the problem of unusual cases with unusual things that they probably didn't makewhatever this was called forever which means you'd never build a put the watch back together today.
    • Acetone is a pretty good solvent degreaser for metal parts, and is rather safer than either naphtha or benzine, as small amounts are naturally produced and metabolised in the body. Just keep it away from most plastics & finishes! (OSHA limits for a eight hour exposure: Acetone 1000ppm, Heptane 500ppm, Benzine/Light naphtha 350ppm, Naphtha 100ppm). Naphtha (the 100ppm one) can contain trace amounts of Benzene, which is a carcinogen. [I used the US standards as Naphtha is not generally listed in the UK documents & I wanted all data from the same source].
    • leave it with me, I'll see what I can do 🙂
    • I agree and I should of called it interesting case. I don't agree with all of his techniques but as said I found it interesting.  Have you worked on a similar case?  
×
×
  • Create New...