Jump to content

Tissot second gear movement


Recommended Posts

Tossot sea star 784-2. The mail part of this gear comes in contact with the escape wheel face is up but when face is down gravity pulls it down and gears no longer engage. Are the ridges on the tip of the shaft supposed to stop it from traveling too far into the tube?  Very lose. does the end of the tube need to be closed a little?

IMG_5082.JPG

IMG_5084.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you could put the gears in the watch and give us a picture so we could see what you're talking about. I have an idea but I really need to see the two gears in the watch.So maybe just put these gears in the escape wheel and so we can see you don't have to put the main plate on top

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Something doesn't look right. If you check some of the videos on YouTube, the 784 has another intermediate bridge

Usually when you see wheels like this there is some form of intermediate plate in between the two. Looking at the parts list I could see what look like a plate but so much better if you can see a picture of the problem. Looking at the picture we can see there's a plate missing.

Found a video or someone servicing one of these and I got your picture I think of you put the plate in the wheels will function better.

https://youtu.be/UwU9cBMaDAA

 

 

 

missing plate.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Non-magnetic is a poor description of such a hairspring. A better description would be unmagnetisable hairspring. There are metals and alloys that are attracted to magnets, but don’t become magnetised themselves. A hairspring made out such a material will be attracted to magnetised tweezers, but will not become magnetised. These hairsprings can be disrupted by being in close proximity to a magnet, but the disruption will cease the moment the magnet is moved away. These are hairsprings that could conceivably be disrupted by a magnetised hairspring stud. Best Regards, Mark
    • More than enough. Here's mine at the height I work at. I think the working distance with the included 0.5x Barlow lens is about 9".   So yes, that halves the magnification. The full story is the objective lens goes from 0.7x to 4.5x. The eyepieces are 10x, giving you the advertised magnification of 7x-45x. However the working distance is unacceptably short, so it comes with an 0.5x Barlow lens, reducing the magnification range to 3.5x-22.5x, but giving you a good working distance. What I did was buy a pair of Extreme Widefield 20x Eyepieces for when I need more magnification. You keep your high working distance, but get your 45x magnification back, at the cost of some width of field.
    • Modern ones after blue steel, invar, elinvar and nivarox , the shiny one are not supposed to become magnetised. But i have had them jump to tweezers. And i dont really understand the comment that what can be magnetised is the stud carrier and rate regulator and they can attract the hairspring ? If the hairspring is non magnetic then how can it be attracted to something else thats become magnetise, its non magnetic , that doesn't really make sense to be ?
    • Does it say 17 jewels on the dial or on the movement ?
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds. 
×
×
  • Create New...