Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm in the middle of a teardown, repair, re-assembly of a Tissot 27-2t movement from the late '40's.  I'm trying to track down a roller table with the impulse jewel in it.  Used movements of this caliber are tough to come by on the Bay so I tried MATSYS to get a bestfit number which was 82S/373R and the factory number 730/ETA 2890 according to the search.

When I did a 'bestfit# & interchangeability" using the bestfit number above, it came back with ten (10) movements....six ETAs and four Omegas.  Thing is, all these movements are from the 1990's or newer.  I can't conceive that the roller table on a late '40's watch is still being used fifty years later.  Perhaps I'm applying the numbers wrong.
 

Posted

Go on to Dr ranfft's site to see all calibers of the family T27-t is a member of, notice the family beats 18000 per hr , roller tables interchange.

 Profile of impulse jewel has to do with lift angle and the table steers the guard pin, a roller table and iimpuls jewel assembly may interchange between caliber of different beat as well. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ranfft's site is the first site I visit when looking for parts to a movement I'm working on because it lists other movements from the family.  Its also the place I go before picking up another movement to see how many other movements I might be able to get parts from and its how I know the movements that the MATSYS returned on the interchangeability search I did where much newer than the movement I need the part for.  It really is a handy tool.

Just for the hell of, I'm going to grab a scrap movement the MATSYS returned in my search and see if the roller table would work with my vintage Tissot.

These are the returns I got from the MATSYS search for the Bestfit # (82s/373R).  I'm interpreting these as movement numbers...is  that correct?image.png.4cafeba37ac0c6b9f930d6be1bb1a5a6.png

Edited by PostwarO27
Posted

I've looked at the good old fashioned Bestfit catalogue for you...

This indicates the roller reference should be 104R where you've been guided to 373R. In fact roller references don't even go that high in this olde worlde catalogue but given your movements is from the 1950s I'd be more inclined to believe it especially as your 373R seems to be referencing much more modern movements.

The dimensions btw for the 104R roller are given in the image below if it helps cross reference any.

The 104R reference roller is shared across the whole of the Tissot '27' family and a handful of other manufacturers. Specifically if it helps:

Cupillard: 233, 233D

International: 70, 77, 88, 89

Tissot: 27-2, 27.3, 27-21T, 27-23, 27.53, 27.63, 27B, 27B1, 27B2, 27B-21, 27B-621, 27M, 27T, 27-1T, 27-2T, 27-61T

Wittnauer: 17T, 17TT, 65

 

image.png.f8db9f04e8aa71e92493e4cdf1484c68.png

 

  • Like 1
Posted

This is how green I am...  I found out why my search on they MATSYS was giving me references to much newer movements.  I don't have an account so I was using the 'online demo' version.  That gives the same results no matter what caliber you type into the search.

This makes your info all the more valuable.  I tracked down a roller table with the impulse jewel intact from a Cuppillard 233 on Ebay.  I got the table and delivery for under $10US

Posted
On 4/4/2022 at 5:26 PM, WatchMaker said:

Hi @PostwarO27 - glad I could help. Hope this parts match up works out; sounds like you've sourced a bargain so not much to lose.

Bargain doesn't begin to describe it....its coming to the US from Spain

  • Haha 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...