Jump to content

35mm Barlow lens thread?


Capie

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Think this is my first posting on your forum. Been "setting up" for quite a while now which is proving expensive.... Already bought a few batches, as well as singles, of old mechanical watches cheaply. Although some are Eterna, Girard Perregaux, Avia, Cyma etc etc and other nice makes, the fog is starting to clear up to see why they went so cheaply! Missing stems and crowns, damaged dials, missing hands, (probably) broken mainsprings etc etc. Anyway, its going to be a learning process in ALL aspects of watch repairing.

Now my problem. Got my hands recently on a beautiful well cared for German made Askania GSZ stereo microscope with 12,5x eyepieces fitted (and hot, yellow Halogen spot-lighting...) . In its current configuration, I'm getting 10 to 50 magnification at a working distance of about 70mm. In order to get my working distance up and my magnification down, I'd like to fit a 0,5x or 0,32x Barlow lens. BUT.... the normal thread size it seems is 42 or 48mm for these lenses!!! By measuring with a ruler, it looks as if I'll be needing a 35mm thread.

I have contacted the friendly and helpful folk of Askania in Germany and they do have stock, but at a cost of 131 Euros plus shipping to South Africa by UPS of 167 Euros. I paid about 200 Euros for the mic! Its such a nice microscope and would like to keep it, but not only for close-up inspections. I need one doitall mic.

Do you guys know where I can look for 35mm Barlow lens (35mm tbc by Askania, if they are willing to divulge that info).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, so I decided to get a M36x0,75 to M42x0,74 (T2) male-female adapter and a 0,5x M42 lens. Got two adapter manufacturers/suppliers of which one sits in Belarus and won't currently export to South Africa (Rafcamera) and then Lacerta in Austria.

The lens I ordered is a Hayear with the M42 thread, of which the quality I'm not certain of. At least its made of metal and glass!! Saw the same Hayear lens on various sites but at a very wide price range!!!  Also ordered a 56 LED ring lamp with the lens. The current yellow, hot Halogen spot lamp is not working for me.

Should I decide in future (not that I have any reference) that the lens is crappy, I'll be able to get a more readily available M42 to M48 adapter, and then can choose among the wider range of M48 lenses.

I'll post some pics as soon as I get these items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I'm not getting real joy from the Hayear 0.5 Barlow lens I bought. Working distance before was 7,1cm. With the Barlow its about 8,5cm, instead of the quoted and expected 16,5cm.

By looking at a Barlow lens operation diagram, perhaps the 5mm adapter moved the Barlow lens too far away from the objective lenses? Or perhaps the Hayear is just plainly inferior?

I'm on the verge of ordering the original 131Euro lens at 160Euro shipping!!! For my 200Euro Askania uscope..... Lol

Edited by Capie
mm vs cm
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Capie said:

I'm not getting real joy from the Hayear 0.5 Barlow lens I bought. Working distance before was 7,1cm. With the Barlow its about 8,5cm, instead of the quoted and expected 16,5cm.

By looking at a Barlow lens operation diagram, perhaps the 5mm adapter moved the Barlow lens too far away from the objective lenses? Or perhaps the Hayear is just plainly inferior?

I'm on the verge of ordering the original 131Euro lens at 160Euro shipping!!! For my 200Euro Askania uscope..... Lol

Some watches are a hole where one tosses money to make it disappear. I've yet to experience a similar experience with the microscope. Thanks for the warning!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it all worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this worked for me 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...