Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was practicing disassembly and reassembly of a Tissot 2700, an extremely small ladies movement, when the balance cock flipped. Long story short, after initial attempts to fix the hairspring, the terminal curve was extremely deformed, and the movement wouldn’t even run. After many more hours of adjusting the terminal curve, and introducing many kinks and straightening them out, I managed to reform a terminal hairspring on the tiny hairspring.

Now the movement has extreme positional variation, (-40 s to +200s) over six positions, change in beat error over different positions, and lower amplitude (230deg) in the vertical positions compared to the horizontal (290deg). I’m quite hesitant to try and fix the hairspring even more, because I’m not sure if the hairspring can take more manipulation.

If this was in a professional setting, what would you do? At some point it would be better to get a new hairspring if possible, as time is money, but this may not always be possible? In a sense, this hairspring manipulation was my first successful attempt at forming a terminal curve, but you can’t  keep retrying as the hairspring will eventually have metal fatigue...

Posted (edited)

I haven’t closed the boot, but this is the final shape of the terminal curve. You can see small twists and kinks even after straightening.

7CC57A68-564D-441F-A9FF-9065962FEE5C.jpeg

Edited by ifibrin
Posted
1 hour ago, ifibrin said:

I haven’t closed the boot, but this is the final shape of the terminal curve. You can see small twists and kinks even after straightening.

Surely you know, unless a kink in terminal curve is right inside the regulator slot it wont create any problem. 

Hairspring rubbing or fouling itself seem to be the cause in this case.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

There appears to be an overlap of the 1st and 2nd coil at the position near the stud.

With the balanced wheel removed and the hairspring on the balance cock, is the collet centered properly?

Unfortunately, it's hard to get a new hairspring and even more so for a ladies watch. I think you are almost there. Centre the collet properly and see if there is still an overlap of the outer coils. Ganbatte! 🙂

  • Thanks 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Surely you know, unless a kink in terminal curve is right inside the regulator slot it wont create any problem. 

Hairspring rubbing or fouling itself seem to be the cause in this case.

 

The ladies movement is too small for me to see if the hairspring is fouling itself, but that’s a reasonable guess. The terminal curve doesn’t seem to be bouncing evenly between the pin and curb though. I’m also not sure if the hairspring is entirely flat…

it’s difficult to install the balance cock without the Center wheel teeth catching on the hairspring, further contributing to potentially distorting the hairspring everytime the balance cock is installed. I suppose getting around 15 rounds of practice with this movement is already quite a lot.

26 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

There appears to be an overlap of the 1st and 2nd coil at the position near the stud.

With the balanced wheel removed and the hairspring on the balance cock, is the collet centered properly?

Unfortunately, it's hard to get a new hairspring and even more so for a ladies watch. I think you are almost there. Centre the collet properly and see if there is still an overlap of the outer coils. Ganbatte! 🙂

I haven’t removed the hairspring from the balance wheel, all manipulation was done with the balance wheel still attached to the hairspring, without the balance cock.

The hairspring doesn’t have an overlap of the first and second coil near the stud, it’s an optical illusion from the photo, because the coil is near the edge of the balance cock.

Posted
57 minutes ago, ifibrin said:

I haven’t removed the hairspring from the balance wheel, all manipulation was done with the balance wheel still attached to the hairspring, without the balance cock.

You have to remove the hairspring from the balance and put it on the cock to test the centering and to form the end curve.

I can't imagine doing hairspring work without a microscope.

Posted
On 3/30/2022 at 11:06 AM, spectre6000 said:

I can imagine fixing a hairspring without a microscope, as I've attempted it many times. Never was successful, but attempted it. 🙂

Same.  I've got a Gruen Curvex (350) balance assembly on my bench at the moment that is currently winning the fight.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
×
×
  • Create New...