Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is my first watch that was in a 'running' condition that I disassembled, cleaned and oiled.  It is branded as an Elgin 891, but also has the FHF 72 movement mark.

Prior to this watch, I have got hold of a few scrap movements to practice disassembly/assembly.  I'm glad I did that as I've already mangled a few hair springs, and bent a few pivots by being a bit too clumsy.

I am just starting out, and I've not got a mainspring winder, so I left the barrel alone to see if I could at least take most of a simple movement apart and put it back together and it still run afterwards.

The watch wants to run, but the amplitude is very low and will stop after a few minutes.  The watch ran better before I touched it, so it points to something I've done. 

One thing of note, when I apply winding pressure to the crown, the amplitude increases to a healthy looking level, but soon reduces back down once I release the pressure.

My question is, would this point towards a weak mainspring, or do I have to take it on the chin and accept I've probably bent a pivot somewhere?  The mainspring is fully wound.

My cleaning process is using lighter fluid at this point, and I've used 9010 on the pivots, and D5 round the barrel arbor.  I created a peg-wood tool to remove/replace the kif shock-spring, as I've seen here/you-tube, which seemed to go well.

 

S20220129_004.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Rhobin said:

The watch ran better before I touched it, so it points to something I've done. 

Outstanding? You've learned an important lesson that the problem might be just you or perhaps you adding to the problem. So many newbies failed to grasp that they very likely are the major problem with why there watches not running.

7 hours ago, Rhobin said:

y question is, would this point towards a weak mainspring, or do I have to take it on the chin and accept I've probably bent a pivot somewhere?  The mainspring is fully wound.

Problem is it could be just about anything? Basically if you get the watch to run with more pressure it still could be about anything. It just says that the power from the mainspring isn't getting to the balance wheel or if it's getting there the balance wheel is having a problem.

Look in at the balance wheel look at the hairspring make sure it's flat make sure it's not touching the balance arms. You can lose a lot of energy if that hairspring isn't where it's supposed to be.

Out of curiosity how did you lubricate the escapement? With power on remove the balance wheel gently push on the fork Doesn't snap nicely as you push in one direction unsnapped the other way when you push it the other way? In other words you can simulate the balance wheel and just gently push on the fork see if it snaps back and forth? The reason I asked about lubricating the escapement is normally do that with a little power on and you should've observed whether the fork was moving freely when you are lubricating. A lot of the things you look at you do it before you get the watch assembled so you have less surprises of oh dear my watch doesn't run. Not that that doesn't happen sometimes.

Let all the power off remove the pallet fork gently start to wind the watch does the gear train start up and spin or does it seem to not spin at all? Worst-case if you wind the watch up quite a bit before the train spins that would be undesirable. Then if you wind it and it just starts to spin effortlessly that would be good look in and make sure the wheels look like they're reasonably flat though. In other words are not wobbling up and down or other undesirable things.

Then what happens if you don't touch the mainspring? If the prior lubrication has gone really really bad it can act as a glue and glue the mainspring together. This means if you're lucky the watch will run fully wound up but it definitely won't run overnight. At the minimum you can take the Off and look at the mainspring and see how it looks. So if it's blue in color the old blued steel tends to set with time. But I sent mainspring will run the watch where it's fully wound up and just won't run it overnight. So not ideal you could leave the mainspring in but you should at least check to see how good or bad it looks. Then at least you could clean and oil the arbor.

As you've commented balance wheels and hairsprings nice place for new people have problems. You could put the balance wheel back in without the pallet fork give the balance wheel puff of air and see how moves does oscillate back-and-forth nicely or does it come to a screeching halt really fast. Typically when they hairspring is touching the balance arms The balance wheels not colossally nicely. It seems the oscillating fine turn it upside down make sure it still is oscillating nicely.

then who made your watch? As a reminder the name on the dial possibly name on the case name on the back of the movement doesn't mean that they made the watch at all. Elgin and their very later years started to purchase overseas movement save and had an overseas factory. Later on they were just a name. So to epically whoever made the movement you'll find usually under the balance wheel at least in later watch is sometimes a manufacturer hides that it could be on the dial side.

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&FHF_72

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the detail reply and suggestions.  Much appreciated.

 

6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Look in at the balance wheel look at the hairspring make sure it's flat make sure it's not touching the balance arms. You can lose a lot of energy if that hairspring isn't where it's supposed to be.

Having removed the balance and replaced it after following up on some of the suggestions, the balance wheel seems to be tilted.  It does seem to have a little more amplitude after putting the balance back in.

I took off the cap stones to take a look at the pivots. Both seem to be extending through the jewel hole.  The balance wheel looked level when I had the movement dial side up without the cap stone on, and it seems more level with it back in.  So I guess I didn't do as well with the shock-springs as I thought.

The amplitude is better but still fairly low, but not much worse from when I first opened the case. It gets worse when I try different positions, so I guess I've still got balance jewel issues, although things don't look too bad with the limited magnification I have.

 

6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Out of curiosity how did you lubricate the escapement? With power on remove the balance wheel gently push on the fork Doesn't snap nicely as you push in one direction unsnapped the other way when you push it the other way? In other words you can simulate the balance wheel and just gently push on the fork see if it snaps back and forth?

I didn't lubricate the pallet stones. I do have some oil for it, but I was going to do that if things looked like they were reasonably healthy.

I did try the fork snap check. But only for a couple of times. I hadn't checked the whole wheel.  I went back and did that, and it seems to snap between consistently.  I've not got much to compare against to say if there is a significant amount of power in the snap, but it looks OK to me from what I've seen in YouTube videos.

 

5 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Does balance oscilate freely without the fork in place? 

Without the fork, the balance wheel oscillates really nicely. It takes quite a while to come back to rest after a bit of a blow from the air pump/blower.

8 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Let all the power off remove the pallet fork gently start to wind the watch does the gear train start up and spin or does it seem to not spin at all? Worst-case if you wind the watch up quite a bit before the train spins that would be undesirable.

It doesn't want to start up, but the slightest nudge will get it going.

 

At this point, I'm thinking my problems relate to the balance stones.  Caused by me, or something pre-existing but made worse by me.  There does seem to be a bit too much end-shake on the balance when I nudge it with some peg-wood when it has no power.  The jewels look OK to my eye - posted images with the jewels in-place without the end-stones.  Is it possible I was too rough with the peg-wood while cleaning the jewels in the main plate?

S20220130_0017.thumb.jpg.4c9e715f57d2debc64fdc3b162ba6ed5.jpgS20220130_0019.thumb.jpg.c46af9b44a93bc54719b61e8274e95f5.jpgS20220130_0017.thumb.jpg.4c9e715f57d2debc64fdc3b162ba6ed5.jpg

 

 

slanted_balance_wheel.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, Rhobin said:
10 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

 

Let all the power off remove the pallet fork gently start to wind the watch does the gear train start up and spin or does it seem to not spin at all? Worst-case if you wind the watch up quite a bit before the train spins that would be undesirable. Then if you wind it and it just starts to spin effortlessly that would be good look in and make sure the wheels look like they're reasonably flat though. In other words are not wobbling up and down or other undesirable things.

 

 

It doesn't want to start up, but the slightest nudge will get it going.

   

So loosen bridge screws up to two turns, does it then start up and gears run effortlessly? 

 

The last picture shows balance wheel tilted and close enough to fork cock to rub. You stated the rim itself is level, so its the balance pivot that gets out of jewel hole, which conceivably is due to excessive end shake on balance staff/ pivot. 

I'd put everything back and check the end shake which ideally should be aprox .02mm. 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

So loosen bridge screws up to two turns, does it then start up and gears run effortlessly? 

Nothing changes as I loosen the screws.

 

7 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

I'd put everything back and check the end shake which ideally should be aprox .02mm. 

I think there is way more than that.  Looking through the cap stoned, the pivots seem to be just poking through the jewel holes on both sides. 

Is the balance staff end-shake limited by the end-stones, or the taper of the pivots in the jewel holes?

I guess balance staffs and shock systems are my next topic to read up on.

Thanks for all the suggestions and information. 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Rhobin said:

is the balance staff end-shake limited by the end-stones, or the taper of the pivots in the jewel holes?

Yes, limited by end stones only. 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Rhobin said:

balance wheel seems to be tilted.

Tilted is definitely not good

5 hours ago, Rhobin said:

So I guess I didn't do as well with the shock-springs as I thought.

In your original picture we can see the gold springs or spring holding the balance jewels in do any of the later pictures have the spring in place?

5 hours ago, Rhobin said:

I didn't lubricate the pallet stones. I do have some oil for it, but I was going to do that if things looked like they were reasonably healthy.

I did try the fork snap check. But only for a couple of times. I hadn't checked the whole wheel.  I went back and did that, and it seems to snap between consistently.  I've not got much to compare against to say if there is a significant amount of power in the snap, but it looks OK to me from what I've seen in YouTube videos.

It's amazing how much friction if you don't lubricate the escapement.

43 minutes ago, Rhobin said:

Is the balance staff end-shake limited by the end-stones, or the taper of the pivots in the jewel holes?

I guess balance staffs and shock systems are my next topic to read up on.

I have a link below to YouTube video not the same system you have but they're all similar. The end stone is what determines the end shake but it's also control by the spring on the end That holds the whole thing together. Then the little hard to see in the video but you do want to be careful that the end stone is flat on the side that faces the pivot and its curved on the other side. You definitely wanted facing the proper direction

https://youtu.be/8fdtEU1hJ4Q

 

 

Posted
On 1/30/2022 at 10:30 PM, JohnR725 said:

In your original picture we can see the gold springs or spring holding the balance jewels in do any of the later pictures have the spring in place?

No. But when I get time I can take some and add them.

I'll also give the escapement a bit of an oil. At this point, I will probably give things another quick clean and oil. May as well, I need the practice.

On 1/30/2022 at 10:30 PM, JohnR725 said:

I have a link below to YouTube video not the same system you have but they're all similar.

Thanks. I'll try to take a closer look to ensure I've got the cap stones the correct way round.

I think I saw somewhere that a heavy handed way of reducing end-shake on the balance was to bend the balance cock? Not sure how that would be possible.  I guess the only other way is replacing the balance staff with one with longer pivots.  Not that I have the skill or tools for that. So I guess sourcing another balance complete.

All of this, of course, is dependant on my correctly interpreting your suggestions and coming to the correct conclusions.

Thanks again. I'll report back if I have anything to add or ask. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Rhobin said:

I think I saw somewhere that a heavy handed way of reducing end-shake on the balance was to bend the balance cock? Not sure how that would be possible.  I guess the only other way is replacing the balance staff with one with longer pivots.  Not that I have the skill or tools for that. So I guess sourcing another balance complete.

Just to be clear you cannot check End shake without the end stones in place and the Springs holding them in. As there protected balance jewels system it would be unlikely the pivots are broken is also equally unlikely that there too short not impossible but just unlikely also unlikely that you're really having an issue. You're more likely to have an issue with the hairspring touching the balance wheel.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/30/2022 at 10:30 PM, JohnR725 said:

In your original picture we can see the gold springs or spring holding the balance jewels in do any of the later pictures have the spring in place?

Sorry this has taken a while to get.  I've attached images of the dial-side and balance cock jewels.

 

On 1/30/2022 at 10:30 PM, JohnR725 said:

Then the little hard to see in the video but you do want to be careful that the end stone is flat on the side that faces the pivot and its curved on the other side. You definitely wanted facing the proper direction

 

I'm struggling with this aspect - when I look at the end-stones through my loupe they don't really look any different. 

I've got a cheep USB 'microscope', but even with that I find it difficult to see a difference in the sides.  My tweezer skills are still a bit poor, so I'm finding it difficult to take a photo of the jewel on-edge.   Although I just thought rodico would be my friend in trying to do that.

 

I notice that the shine off the end-stone jewel is different depending which way up it is.  I took a photo of the movement side end-stone in both ways, and attached them. Would I be correct in thinking that photo with more diffuse light reflections that are away from the edge would indicate the flat side in upwards?  I was thinking the more diffuse light would be travelling through the jewel so is refracted more, but the sharper white reflections on the edge would indicate the curve of the stone on the upper face.  My reasoning may be completely wrong on that though.

 

S20220213_003.jpg

S20220213_004.jpg

S20220213_001.jpg

S20220213_002.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, Rhobin said:

USB 'microscope'

One of the misconceptions of people with microscopes are thinking they will let you somehow magically see better and they did not. You need to know what you're looking at and what you're looking for and why you're looking at it because otherwise the microscope does not help at all.

2 hours ago, Rhobin said:

I notice that the shine off the end-stone jewel is different depending which way up it is. 

Yes that's exactly how you tell. If you look at a reflection like a light source the curved surface distorts the view of the light you are looking at the flat surface it doesn't distort. Like if you had a florescent tube along the light source it makes it a lot easier.

Go find yourself a shiny round glass look at the glass and see a reflection on the glass see how it distorts the image then take a flat mere look at the same reflected image curve service will give you a different reflection than the flat surface. Otherwise the curvature is so slight it's hard to just look at it and see you have to look at the reflection.

Posted

 There is no evidence of pivot inside the jewel hole ( 2nd picture , of cock up) so possibly pivot is worn and doesn't stay in jewel hole. 

You say " the watch run better before you touched it"   so mainspring is unlikely to be the cause of low amplitude in this case, specially if baŕrel looked OK and its lid properly refitted. 

So, check the end shake,if needed  shim the cock to adjust the end shake , ewel setting can also be moved to the same effect, if you can confirm short pivot, you might get away with simply facing  the curved side of the end stone to the pivot ( this approach is frowned upon since  oil will not stay on top of the dome) or replace the balance staff with a new one.

 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...