Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Over the last few months working on scrap movement I've built up quite a stock. Most I'll keep as my spares stock or service them again now my work is getting tidier. I'd like to build a few it to time pieces and to that end I bought some NOS Benrus 1345 cases and dial - old dealer samples. Probably not a great place to start as there is no simple way to shim the movement to fit the case, the dimensions have to be perfect, but I like the look of them and I'd be glad to wear one on my wrist.

The dials have the standard ETA post positions so that was a big clue. One case is marked "self winding". This on was an easy match, second time lucky in fact, an ETA2452 I'd currently servicing fits perfectly, the rotors running free, the dial height being spot on, and the stem perfectly centred. I thought this might be a clue to the vintage and pulled out a ruinously poor ETA2409 to try for fit in the hand wound case but no luck. Whilst the dial site at the correct level, the stem position is about 0.25mm too high in the case and precludes smooth operation. 

Any way - some forum searching later, I came across this thread:

This looks like the self same watch. Does anyone recognise the movement in the pictures. I've linked to the thread as linking direct to the picture isn't allowed. If you recognise the movement, please let me know.

Many thanks!

 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Boz said:

This is the movement if anyone knows it? Thanks in anticipation!

Please post a picture of top side, rotor removed.

Posted
23 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

Not sure I understand the question. The OP in the thread you reference confirms he's working on a Benrus 1345.

Can you clarify what you're after?

I'd like to know what the hand wound movement in the picture is. Its hard to iD without seeing the bridgres on the reverse side. 

Posted (edited)

Hi @Boz

Ah ... I think I can see where the misunderstanding has happened. Seeing the OP said this was a Benrus 1345 I thought it would be straightforward to do some web research to find out what movement was used. Having had a look around myself I can see it's anything but!

My best guess is that it is an Eterna from this family: http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Eterna_1424U_2

To try and be helpful / show where I'm coming from I include a composite below of your reference pic oriented with the Eterna for comparison (clearly the hour wheel has been removed in the reference pic). Do your dial feet positions tie up?

image.png.dc46adbc991bf3def640b1be5f680921.png

 

Edited by WatchMaker
Posted

Thank-you so much! The dial feet match your picture exactly. I'll set up a search alert on the 'bay and see what crops up.

Posted
On 2/5/2022 at 11:29 AM, Boz said:

Thanks again @WatchMaker for an excellent starting point. After a less than half an hour on Ranfft I think I've found it, the Eterna 1448U. 

Ah good, glad that helped. A 1448U looks nothing like the reference movement you asked about (and thus 141x/142x family I pointed your towards) but if this has got you where you want that's good news.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First of all, thank you for the pdf file of the book on how to replace a gem. So, if there is a problem with the ruby in the movement, should I buy a new or used movement and replace it? When I watch videos on YouTube of people fixing used watches, I feel like there should be a way to buy a gem. Is there no way to buy it?
    • I suppose @donutdan is not forced to earn his living by repairing watches.  I suppose he does it as a hobby and wants to gain experience, to get better in watchmaking and time is not the issue. Then @donutdan should rather try to repair the damage instead of swap parts from a maybe intact other movement. Swapping parts is not watchmaking. And often swapped parts are not the expected solution of all problems. All mentioned damages are repairable. Frank  
    • Yeah I figured that one out when I googled and realized that my spindle is actually from Horia. It's smooth with no screwable cap.
    • I am puzzled by something a snipped out something from your image and what exactly disassemble tell us? my confusion is the symbol for FHF looks like image I have below year symbol as a star and righted this instant are not finding what that means? I suppose we could use the fingerprint system to verify it really is what it claimed to be. Size itself is really interesting there's almost no watches in that particular size. Then were missing details in the photograph above like diameter of movements to verify it really is the size and are missing the setting components.   went to the bestfit book looking at the symbols didn't see it. Look at the link below I did find it back to the bestfit book and yes it really is there https://reference.grail-watch.com/documents/history-of-ebauches-sa/ then bestfit book says lists the size as 10 1/2. one of the problems with vintage watches is finding parts yes a donor watch would be good.
    • Actually, this could be the issue. Drag from the module could be overcoming the cannon pinion. It was definitely not at the point that the driving wheel was loose on the cannon pinion, it took a little bit of effort to rotate it when applying the grease. Maybe I need to look again at applying oil to the pivots.    Yeah, it's very annoying. I don't want to give up on it, so back on with it over again until I catch a break. 
×
×
  • Create New...