Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello,

I have come across an Omega pocket watch (18 size, 7 jewels) and need your help identifying the caliber.

Serial number according to https://serial-number-decoder.co.uk/omega/omega.htm mentions 1912 production year, and that's about it.

I need to order a few parts, but without the caliber I won't be able to order the missing crown wheel or a new balance staff.

While looking great on the ourside, solid silver case and all, insider there was a nasty surprise, I have never seen a watch so dirty or corroded. I suspect salt water ingress, and then someone seems to have dunk the whole watch in some sort of oil.

Any help is highly appreciated.

Thank you.

P1030375.JPG

P1030374.JPG

P1030372.JPG

1642988650974.jpg

Edited by Dmitry
added size
Posted
8 hours ago, Klassiker said:

YYep, looks like it! I think the 26513 stamp refers to the keyless setting swiss patent. I noticed the other Regina PW I posted about earlier has the same construction, which makes sense as the calibers are only a few years apart and Regina Watch Co was replaced with Omega later on.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Dmitry said:

YYep, looks like it! I think the 26513 stamp refers to the keyless setting swiss patent. I noticed the other Regina PW I posted about earlier has the same construction, which makes sense as the calibers are only a few years apart and Regina Watch Co was replaced with Omega later on.

Interesting, thanks for posting it.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First of all, thank you for the pdf file of the book on how to replace a gem. So, if there is a problem with the ruby in the movement, should I buy a new or used movement and replace it? When I watch videos on YouTube of people fixing used watches, I feel like there should be a way to buy a gem. Is there no way to buy it?
    • I suppose @donutdan is not forced to earn his living by repairing watches.  I suppose he does it as a hobby and wants to gain experience, to get better in watchmaking and time is not the issue. Then @donutdan should rather try to repair the damage instead of swap parts from a maybe intact other movement. Swapping parts is not watchmaking. And often swapped parts are not the expected solution of all problems. All mentioned damages are repairable. Frank  
    • Yeah I figured that one out when I googled and realized that my spindle is actually from Horia. It's smooth with no screwable cap.
    • I am puzzled by something a snipped out something from your image and what exactly disassemble tell us? my confusion is the symbol for FHF looks like image I have below year symbol as a star and righted this instant are not finding what that means? I suppose we could use the fingerprint system to verify it really is what it claimed to be. Size itself is really interesting there's almost no watches in that particular size. Then were missing details in the photograph above like diameter of movements to verify it really is the size and are missing the setting components.   went to the bestfit book looking at the symbols didn't see it. Look at the link below I did find it back to the bestfit book and yes it really is there https://reference.grail-watch.com/documents/history-of-ebauches-sa/ then bestfit book says lists the size as 10 1/2. one of the problems with vintage watches is finding parts yes a donor watch would be good.
    • Actually, this could be the issue. Drag from the module could be overcoming the cannon pinion. It was definitely not at the point that the driving wheel was loose on the cannon pinion, it took a little bit of effort to rotate it when applying the grease. Maybe I need to look again at applying oil to the pivots.    Yeah, it's very annoying. I don't want to give up on it, so back on with it over again until I catch a break. 
×
×
  • Create New...