Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello wrt forum,

I have a maybe 80’s automatic mido ocean star.  I bought this as a project.  I haven’t encountered this type of screw back.  There are no flats or indents for tool to grab.  Just a round back with hardly a gap.  I tried the sticky ball but no luck so far.  Has anyone encountered this type of back on a Mido.  Is there a special tool I need to have.  Any suggestions would be helpful.

Thanks

Posted
4 hours ago, Hirst said:

I haven’t encountered this type of screw back.  There are no flats or indents for tool to grab.  Just a round back with hardly a gap.

If there are no points or ridges to grab on, then it's not a screw back. 

However, for this and most other questions you need to post clear pictures taken from multiple angles.

  • Like 1
Posted

pictures would've been helpful but you still would've had problems following the standard procedure. As suggested above the back definitely does not come off. This watch goes out through the front the crystal comes off. then standard procedure to remove the crown on a frontloading watches is typically it's pulled out really hard it just pops apart.

the problem with the standard procedure is it isn't universal for all frontloading watches. My familiarity with this particular watch was another watchmaker in the shop followed the standard procedure and had a problem. One of the photographs is missing as I don't have a really good picture when he figured out he couldn't pop the crown back in again he tried to tighten the end of the stem and one side of it broke off.

the preferred method of disassembling something like this is to slide the movement out the two pieces of the stem will slide apart.

even though this was the other watchmakers problem it became my problem because I am really good at finding spare parts. This one was challenging took almost a year for a variety of miscellaneous problems. In order to get a crown we had to find eventually a case on eBay that came with its crown. That's because you can't buy this crown all by itself at least I didn't find it. Then the stems they come in a variety of lengths none of which seem to correspond to lengths that we had? The reason for the different lengths is as a guess this watch goes in other frontloading cases that require a different  Length. I think what I finally did was buy a whole bunch of them from several different sources just to find one that worked.

the problem with frontloading watches is you can't always see whether it's the standard pop apart crown or it slides apart she is want to be careful.

Mido Ocean-star case.JPG

mido 1117 mcp3.JPG

mido 1117 mcp2.JPG

mido 1117 mcp1.JPG

Posted

Hello John, 

thank you for the detailed reply.  This looks almost exactly what I have but no inscription of vacuum on the back,  Just Mido Ocean star.  The stem is off this one but I can see the split inside the case as in your image.  I can wind the movement from the split.  How would one remove the crystal and then movement.  There just doesn’t see anywhere to grab.  crystal insertion tool?  It’s acrylic.  I did inspect the back today under magnification and there is definitely a seam were a screw back should come off.  Just the seam looks incredibly tight.  When ans if I can remove the crystal, then is the movement just held in by the crystal?

Thanks

1D7E3419-F98B-4324-AB8C-E38409236A12.jpeg

A28DAF37-4854-40D6-AA69-766B760F8A09.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, Hirst said:

Mido Ocean star

being curious I googled  and oceans star appears to be a very common name they had which means it could be any kind of case  etc.

1 hour ago, Hirst said:

The stem is off this one but I can see the split inside

then this definitely indicates that it's a split stem  which means it probably still goes out through the front..

But if you look at the picture of your back to the lettering is perfectly centered if it was a screw back  that doesn't always happen. although in your picture  it does look like there's a notch at 12 o'clock position and either at the nine or 3 o'clock position but normally for screw off back said be a little more pronounced?

I did find an example of a watch similar to if not the same as what I was talking about.  Even has the same movement I believe  from memory.

https://chronotimepieces.com/shop/vintage-watches/mido-ocean-star-powerwind-automatic-with-cal-917p/

then your pictures don't really show the crystal the way we need to see it. Looking straight down it almost looks flat..this is the kind the tool you would use to normally remove the crystal like this

https://www.esslinger.com/watch-crystal-remover-and-inserter-crystal-lift-tool/

the other way to tell if it goes out the front versus the back is the look at the size of the dial  and if even if you took the back off would the dial fit through the opening in the back? Otherwise it still has to go through the front side worst-case is another way to get the crystal off but it be better if you could use crystal tool above.

Posted

If the crystal is flat, the crystal lift won't work. Then the only way is to pop it off using air pressure. This is usually done by filling a large syringe with air and forcing it through the pendant tube. But in your second photo, it looks like your pendant tube is either missing or broken. 

Another method I've heard of is to use a suction disk to pull the crystal off. Or even stick something to use as a handle on the glass using hot melt glue.

Posted

Hello John, 

thank you for the detailed reply.  This looks almost exactly what I have but no inscription of vacuum on the back,  Just Mido Ocean star.  The stem is off this one but I can see the split inside the case as in your image.  I can wind the movement from the split.  How would one remove the crystal and then movement.  There just doesn’t see anywhere to grab.  crystal insertion tool?  It’s acrylic.  I did inspect the back today under magnification and there is definitely a seam were a screw back should come off.  Just the seam looks incredibly tight.  When ans if I can remove the crystal, then is the movement just held in by the crystal?

Thanks

Posted

Hello Gent,

All this all these observation are helpful.  You are some observant folks.  The crystal defiantly has a wall allowing gripping.  In addition the face is too large to pass thru the back.  So this is definitely a through the front removal.  I believe the pendant tube is broken off.  Detents you observed are not original.  Now I have a direction. Get the crystal removal tool,  a new crystal, and see what else I can learn.  I’m sure there will be more surprises.

Thanks

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hello Watch repair posters.  I'll add this post as a follow up.  I'm new to this hobby and having quite a bit of fun and gaining some skill while encountering plenty of challenges.  So I've completed my work on this Mido pictured in my earlier post.  I purchased it with a few issues.  No crown,  a broken off pendant tube. cracked crystal, oxidized face and bent second hands.  I have managed to attach a similar 'Mido' crown.  I have completely disassembled this auto winder, cleaned reassembled and lubricated to the best of my know how.  With a new strap, it's my new daily wear.  Keeps great time.  This is my fifth watch project.  I'm currently working on three different ladies automating watches.  Wow are these  movements tiny.  My problem now must be a common one. Too many watches to fix.  I better quit ebay !

restored mido.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...