Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, jdm said:

It is just fine to not epilame pallets,

I wonder how many people in the group use epilame? 

52 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

What I don't quite understand is that I see a similar behaviour when  I don't lube pallets at all, runs good for a few days or weeks then stops. I suppose escape teeth starts scartching pallets, the accumulative effect of which stops the watch, not sure though.

I think we need a clarification? Are we talking about a pin lever escapement or jeweled escapement?

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

To help you in the future I'm curious as to what you're procedure was it didn't work?

 

Do you mean what went wrong in trying to adjust the beat error?  I used the approach Mark had in his video (link below).  The collet was tight, so in trying to turn it as he shows – the screwdriver slipped out of the slot with some force behind it.  That made a mess of the hairspring which I couldn’t fix.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvMCNyrDZQo

Posted
6 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I think we need a clarification? Are we talking about a pin lever escapement or jeweled escapement?

The OP mentioned Molnija's (USSR) but did not post pictures (as it's always good). I believe these are Swiss lever mov.ts.
 

Posted
3 minutes ago, jdm said:

The OP mentioned Molnija's (USSR) but did not post pictures (as it's always good). I believe these are Swiss lever mov.ts.

I'm pretty sure this is a Swiss lever my question related to the discussion regarding epilame pallets. So are hijacking the discussion in a way. As both of us are in agreement that surface treatment isn't necessary and the problem somebody else was having where a bit confusing unless a course somebody was doing a pin pallet escapement even then?

8 minutes ago, Francis said:

Do you mean what went wrong in trying to adjust the beat error?  I used the approach Mark had in his video (link below).  The collet was tight, so in trying to turn it as he shows – the screwdriver slipped out of the slot with some force behind it.  That made a mess of the hairspring which I couldn’t fix.

Yes that was the question I was asking. One of the interesting things in watch repair is there's a variety of ways of doing things. Personally I don't like the balance tack. That I definitely don't like dangling the balance while trying to adjust the beat. I would prefer the balance not be there. Then back C make tools for doing this although their hard to find on eBay basically like a screwdriver but very long taper as you want to be careful with a screwdriver of shoving it in as usually can spread the collet if you're not careful. Then when you're rotating the collet you do have to be careful in that bad things can happen if you're not careful. So now you've learned a lesson next time try to be more careful and not force things that didn't want to rotate don't . And watch repair he would be really careful not to force things.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I wonder how many people in the group use epilame? 

I think we need a clarification? Are we talking about a pin lever escapement or jeweled escapement?

 

I agree with your point.  Used  pin pallet is more susceptible to friction, however, the face of used pallet stones are often far from perfectly smooth. 

Molnija doesn't polish escape teeth half as good as low grade Swiss. 

OP's watches run good for couple of months before they stop, so its a lubricant issue and of all parts in escapement, pallets face-escape teeth is most susceptible to friction.

Regs 

Posted
19 minutes ago, jdm said:

The OP mentioned Molnija's (USSR) but did not post pictures (as it's always good). I believe these are Swiss lever mov.ts.
 

Right, they are Swiss lever escapement ,  but like all Russian movements poorly polished.

Posted

Molnija is a copy of cortebert, there is a world of difference between the two when it comes to polishing. 

@Francis  just a test,   when your watch stops like you say, put some diesel fuel on escape teeth, if your watch picked up and run with excellent amplitude " at low wind"  you have spotted a fault, perhaps the fault.

Regs 

Posted
2 hours ago, Francis said:

The collet was tight, so in trying to turn it as he shows – the screwdriver slipped out of the slot with some force behind it.  That made a mess of the hairspring which I couldn’t fix.

On the very first mov.t that you work on it's too early to attempt delicate (an in this case, largely unnecessary) maneuvers on the balance.

Stay with the basics, build solid dexterity and skills first, these will create self-confidence on which success is based.

It's a long process which requires patience and discipline, no surprise that out of maybe 50 new members that join, after one or two years perhaps only two are still visiting with some results to show.

Posted
On 12/5/2021 at 9:51 AM, Francis said:

My understanding is that too tight a cannon pinion (ie too much friction with the centre post) doesn't affect the way a watch runs, only the way it winds.  

Tight canon pinion affects setting the hands.  

When winding , winding pinion turns the winding wheel which  turns ratchet wheel. 

I should go back and read your thread from the begining since I really have no idea whats it all about.

Regs 

 

Posted
On 9/29/2021 at 2:19 PM, Francis said:

I'm new to this forum and watch repair.

Buy new to watch repair is this the first watch you've ever serviced?

On 9/29/2021 at 2:19 PM, Francis said:

Amplitude, etc were all good at the end of the process and it ran well for a few weeks.

It would've been nice if you had a picture of the timing machine results for us. As you're new to watch repair it might have looked perfect to you but maybe it would not look perfect us. Then what was your actual timing procedure? Did you look at the watch in more than one position. Did you only look at the watch was fully wound up tight or an hour or two later? 

Then exactly how far out of beat was it?

On 9/29/2021 at 2:19 PM, Francis said:

The balance starts when I shake it and then works again for a few hours and stops.  I have two questions:

One of the questions I usually ask is what was the condition of the watch in before you started? In other words are you attempting to fix an existing problem or a new problem that you introduced in learning watch repair?

On 12/3/2021 at 2:29 PM, Francis said:

 I wanted to rescue old beat-up pocket watches and convert those with unsavable or no cases to wristwatches.

Usually my recommendation for new people is to start with a new watch. You need to build up expertise and how to disassemble and reassemble it lubricated etc. and still keep it in running condition. The problem is if you start with a watch that has problems that you think are going to be fixed by cleaning that probably isn't going to happen. Especially on old beat up pocket watches they tend to have interesting life's and if they been worked on before can have all sorts of interesting problems that aren't always easy to find.

 

Posted
11 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Usually my recommendation for new people is to start with a new watch. You need to build up expertise and how to disassemble and reassemble it lubricated etc. and still keep it in running condition. The problem is if you start with a watch that has problems that you think are going to be fixed by cleaning that probably isn't going to happen. Especially on old beat up pocket watches they tend to have interesting life's and if they been worked on before can have all sorts of interesting problems that aren't always easy to find.

To go back to my original post - I had done maybe a handful of Molnijas by that time.  I was systematically going through the calibres since we couldn't do much else during covid where I live in Australia (for a long time we had night curfew and couldn’t travel more than a few miles from home in the daytime).  So I had time to get an understanding of their “interesting lives” as you put it.  Most were actually fine from the get-go and came up well – and as you say, those that weren’t rescued were probably always doomed (although I had a couple of successes).  If they worked at the end, I'd usually on-sell them at a loss - it's a hobby and I can afford to spend on a hobby at my age. 

The watch in question in the original post was a relatively rare transition model (Krystal) between the early 15 jewel ChK-6 Molnija calibre and the later 18 jewel 3602.  I was frustrated because I thought I had the knack of it and the watch worked well for some time after service.  I didn't photograph the timegrapher reading, but I recall it being little different from what I’ll show below even when it was starting to play up.  What I’ve found with most of these old watches is high beat error.  So when the suggestion came in that it was the problem, I decided to give it a crack – but I cracked it instead. 

After the Molnijas I transitioned to small American Hamiltons, which was always my goal.  They also have had interesting lives, although not as hard as the Russians.  It’s one of these that has the issue with the tight tolerance between the cannon pinion and hour wheel – I think the latter got crimped at some point in its interesting life.  

Yes, I understand about starting on cheap new (Chinese) movements – and I did (an ST36).  It was useful, but the Mollies were going to give me the experience for what I wanted to do, so I quickly moved on. Below is the timegrapher of a serviced Molnija that’s been working for months – part-wound, dial up/down & crown up/down.  Most have looked like this. I understand the beat error to be high (like the Krystal) and the amplitude OK given it’s an old watch.  It runs fine in different positions except slow face down – but it keeps good time on wrist, so I’ve left it as is.  But again, it's a learning experience for me - so if I'm missing something - then kindly let me know.  Thanks.

 

IMG_4163.jpeg

IMG_4164.jpeg

IMG_4165.jpeg

IMG_4167.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
×
×
  • Create New...