Jump to content

Anyone come across this Rolex Submariner dial anomaly?


Recommended Posts

Hello all. My first post-introduction post on the forum, so please bear with me. But I wanted to reach out to this community as I am hoping that someone in the watch-repair realm has come across this anomaly.

I recently came across an interesting 1984 16800 Rolex Submariner with an 8.2 mil serial. At first glance everything seems to be in order. However, upon close examination the dial reveals something interesting ... it looks like it's been stamped/struck twice. Comparing the text font and other features, with the exception of the double stamping it looks to be a MKIV dial with all the right features. But the fact that it seems to have been overstamped certainly raises some questions.

I've posted about this issue on Rolex Forums, and there are two prevailing views there: (1) I've never seen this before and is therefore a fake, and (2) everything about the font/dial looks genuine and it is likely a factory error that got past QC.

In addition, I've reached out to several well-known watchmakers and all that have seen the pictures say that they see no indication of a counterfeit dial, though only one has said that he's heard of a double-strike dial in the past.

I also took the watch a local Rolex AD which has an on-site Rolex trained tech. His verdict, "there is nothing in this watch that would indicate that any part of it is not genuine." Particularly with respect to the dial, in his opinion the text looks correct, the spacing looks correct, the texture of the lume plots show the characteristic waffle pattern, the lume reacts to UV light as it should. Basically he's never seen anything like it but he also couldn't find anything that would make him believe that it's a refinish job and he thinks it likely got past QC without being noticed.

With all that, I am curious if anyone here has come across a Rolex dial like this. Am I holding a one-off fake or a one-off genuine?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, if anyone has any thoughts on where else I could go to get a more definitive answer, I'd love to hear those suggestions.


Thanks
 

Click on any of the pictures for higher resolution versions.

 

<a href="https://ibb.co/0qWhmT0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/H7MnB6c/20210430-095820.jpg" alt="20210430-095820" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/SPH2Nkz"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/KXBY6tJ/20210430-095745.jpg" alt="20210430-095745" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/jyG1WS6"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/Lx62J3k/20210430-095544.jpg" alt="20210430-095544" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/wYnCVFw"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/DLBkhH8/20210430-095644.jpg" alt="20210430-095644" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/BBb7DC0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/L1mqwZV/20210430-084134.jpg" alt="20210430-084134" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/w7xj3H9"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/9hCSzXF/20210430-084300.jpg" alt="20210430-084300" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/rs3MznY"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/m80t2Qk/20210430-084203.jpg" alt="20210430-084203" border="0"></a>

 

 

Edited by s0nic2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, s0nic2 said:

Hello all. My first post-introduction post on the forum, so please bear with me. But I wanted to reach out to this community as I am hoping that someone in the watch-repair realm has come across this anomaly.

I recently came across an interesting 1984 16800 Rolex Submariner with an 8.2 mil serial. At first glance everything seems to be in order. However, upon close examination the dial reveals something interesting ... it looks like it's been stamped/struck twice. Comparing the text font and other features, with the exception of the double stamping it looks to be a MKIV dial with all the right features. But the fact that it seems to have been overstamped certainly raises some questions.

I've posted about this issue on Rolex Forums, and there are two prevailing views there: (1) I've never seen this before and is therefore a fake, and (2) everything about the font/dial looks genuine and it is likely a factory error that got past QC.

In addition, I've reached out to several well-known watchmakers and all that have seen the pictures say that they see no indication of a counterfeit dial, though only one has said that he's heard of a double-strike dial in the past.

I also took the watch a local Rolex AD which has an on-site Rolex trained tech. His verdict, "there is nothing in this watch that would indicate that any part of it is not genuine." Particularly with respect to the dial, in his opinion the text looks correct, the spacing looks correct, the texture of the lume plots show the characteristic waffle pattern, the lume reacts to UV light as it should. Basically he's never seen anything like it but he also couldn't find anything that would make him believe that it's a refinish job and he thinks it likely got past QC without being noticed.

With all that, I am curious if anyone here has come across a Rolex dial like this. Am I holding a one-off fake or a one-off genuine?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, if anyone has any thoughts on where else I could go to get a more definitive answer, I'd love to hear those suggestions.


Thanks
 

Click on any of the pictures for higher resolution versions.

 

<a href="https://ibb.co/0qWhmT0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/H7MnB6c/20210430-095820.jpg" alt="20210430-095820" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/SPH2Nkz"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/KXBY6tJ/20210430-095745.jpg" alt="20210430-095745" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/jyG1WS6"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/Lx62J3k/20210430-095544.jpg" alt="20210430-095544" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/wYnCVFw"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/DLBkhH8/20210430-095644.jpg" alt="20210430-095644" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/BBb7DC0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/L1mqwZV/20210430-084134.jpg" alt="20210430-084134" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/w7xj3H9"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/9hCSzXF/20210430-084300.jpg" alt="20210430-084300" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/rs3MznY"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/m80t2Qk/20210430-084203.jpg" alt="20210430-084203" border="0"></a>

 

 

Sorry but the pics are not showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Oh I am well aware of the model that I have.  I am more curious about the double-strike on the dial and whether anyone here that works on watches may have come across something similar in their line of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I wish I could help you but I find this very interesting. I hope it’s legit and it sounds like there’s a good chance it is But there is a guy who has a web article about vintage Rolex dials and how to spot fakes or legit anomalies and he may be able to help. I’ll try to copy the link but just in case it doesn’t work it’s called the Rolex passion report. I don’t know how to contact them but give it a shot.

https://rolexpassionreport.com/21770/the-importance-of-the-vintage-rolex-dial/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
×
×
  • Create New...