Jump to content

Anyone come across this Rolex Submariner dial anomaly?


Recommended Posts

Hello all. My first post-introduction post on the forum, so please bear with me. But I wanted to reach out to this community as I am hoping that someone in the watch-repair realm has come across this anomaly.

I recently came across an interesting 1984 16800 Rolex Submariner with an 8.2 mil serial. At first glance everything seems to be in order. However, upon close examination the dial reveals something interesting ... it looks like it's been stamped/struck twice. Comparing the text font and other features, with the exception of the double stamping it looks to be a MKIV dial with all the right features. But the fact that it seems to have been overstamped certainly raises some questions.

I've posted about this issue on Rolex Forums, and there are two prevailing views there: (1) I've never seen this before and is therefore a fake, and (2) everything about the font/dial looks genuine and it is likely a factory error that got past QC.

In addition, I've reached out to several well-known watchmakers and all that have seen the pictures say that they see no indication of a counterfeit dial, though only one has said that he's heard of a double-strike dial in the past.

I also took the watch a local Rolex AD which has an on-site Rolex trained tech. His verdict, "there is nothing in this watch that would indicate that any part of it is not genuine." Particularly with respect to the dial, in his opinion the text looks correct, the spacing looks correct, the texture of the lume plots show the characteristic waffle pattern, the lume reacts to UV light as it should. Basically he's never seen anything like it but he also couldn't find anything that would make him believe that it's a refinish job and he thinks it likely got past QC without being noticed.

With all that, I am curious if anyone here has come across a Rolex dial like this. Am I holding a one-off fake or a one-off genuine?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, if anyone has any thoughts on where else I could go to get a more definitive answer, I'd love to hear those suggestions.


Thanks
 

Click on any of the pictures for higher resolution versions.

 

<a href="https://ibb.co/0qWhmT0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/H7MnB6c/20210430-095820.jpg" alt="20210430-095820" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/SPH2Nkz"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/KXBY6tJ/20210430-095745.jpg" alt="20210430-095745" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/jyG1WS6"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/Lx62J3k/20210430-095544.jpg" alt="20210430-095544" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/wYnCVFw"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/DLBkhH8/20210430-095644.jpg" alt="20210430-095644" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/BBb7DC0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/L1mqwZV/20210430-084134.jpg" alt="20210430-084134" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/w7xj3H9"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/9hCSzXF/20210430-084300.jpg" alt="20210430-084300" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/rs3MznY"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/m80t2Qk/20210430-084203.jpg" alt="20210430-084203" border="0"></a>

 

 

Edited by s0nic2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, s0nic2 said:

Hello all. My first post-introduction post on the forum, so please bear with me. But I wanted to reach out to this community as I am hoping that someone in the watch-repair realm has come across this anomaly.

I recently came across an interesting 1984 16800 Rolex Submariner with an 8.2 mil serial. At first glance everything seems to be in order. However, upon close examination the dial reveals something interesting ... it looks like it's been stamped/struck twice. Comparing the text font and other features, with the exception of the double stamping it looks to be a MKIV dial with all the right features. But the fact that it seems to have been overstamped certainly raises some questions.

I've posted about this issue on Rolex Forums, and there are two prevailing views there: (1) I've never seen this before and is therefore a fake, and (2) everything about the font/dial looks genuine and it is likely a factory error that got past QC.

In addition, I've reached out to several well-known watchmakers and all that have seen the pictures say that they see no indication of a counterfeit dial, though only one has said that he's heard of a double-strike dial in the past.

I also took the watch a local Rolex AD which has an on-site Rolex trained tech. His verdict, "there is nothing in this watch that would indicate that any part of it is not genuine." Particularly with respect to the dial, in his opinion the text looks correct, the spacing looks correct, the texture of the lume plots show the characteristic waffle pattern, the lume reacts to UV light as it should. Basically he's never seen anything like it but he also couldn't find anything that would make him believe that it's a refinish job and he thinks it likely got past QC without being noticed.

With all that, I am curious if anyone here has come across a Rolex dial like this. Am I holding a one-off fake or a one-off genuine?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, if anyone has any thoughts on where else I could go to get a more definitive answer, I'd love to hear those suggestions.


Thanks
 

Click on any of the pictures for higher resolution versions.

 

<a href="https://ibb.co/0qWhmT0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/H7MnB6c/20210430-095820.jpg" alt="20210430-095820" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/SPH2Nkz"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/KXBY6tJ/20210430-095745.jpg" alt="20210430-095745" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/jyG1WS6"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/Lx62J3k/20210430-095544.jpg" alt="20210430-095544" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/wYnCVFw"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/DLBkhH8/20210430-095644.jpg" alt="20210430-095644" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/BBb7DC0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/L1mqwZV/20210430-084134.jpg" alt="20210430-084134" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/w7xj3H9"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/9hCSzXF/20210430-084300.jpg" alt="20210430-084300" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/rs3MznY"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/m80t2Qk/20210430-084203.jpg" alt="20210430-084203" border="0"></a>

 

 

Sorry but the pics are not showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Oh I am well aware of the model that I have.  I am more curious about the double-strike on the dial and whether anyone here that works on watches may have come across something similar in their line of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I wish I could help you but I find this very interesting. I hope it’s legit and it sounds like there’s a good chance it is But there is a guy who has a web article about vintage Rolex dials and how to spot fakes or legit anomalies and he may be able to help. I’ll try to copy the link but just in case it doesn’t work it’s called the Rolex passion report. I don’t know how to contact them but give it a shot.

https://rolexpassionreport.com/21770/the-importance-of-the-vintage-rolex-dial/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
    • Kind of guessing here watchie with a bit of logic.
    • Canon with FE 4612a movement. Day and Date display Trying something new. Although is will take some time for me to start, I have a back injury that is very painful and so cannot concentrate. Set myself a target to begin mid May. Purchased a Canon wrist watch with  FE 4612a movement. Advertised with Rotor missing. Arrived, took photographs. Strap broken, removed and place in bin. Back removed. No rotor. Wind is stiff. Can wind up. Everything moves ok. Oscillates for under a minute, then stops. No rotor but all wheels appear the be there. Have sent for a donor movement FE4612. No day wheel.  I have taken basic photographs up to the point of service commencement. I will try a new format and use the record system on the microscope to show the full disassembly subsequent assembly. I will photograph the cleaning process.  Whilst I have no intention beginning a YouTube channel, I would like to begin to make a better record of my work standard. Work to do.  Make case to a better standard. Repair crystal. Replace strap.  Only a thought. I will try to insert an English day wheel. Not sure if it can be done, but hey, what can I lose. Got to stop now, back so sore.
×
×
  • Create New...