Jump to content

Post military watch I.D.


markr

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

In fact is that an '80C' by the crown wheel?

if we make some assumptions from your link looks like the C only affects the crown will then all the parts should be for the base 80. I have links below looks like the staff is still available.

 

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=GEN_80

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=U\ZDZIS

http://www.julesborel.com/s.nl/it.A/id.22908/.f

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 4/27/2021 at 7:08 PM, watchweasol said:

Hi wou;d agree with watchmaker   80C   Helvitia data is thin on the ground  only Ranfft has the tech spec  will look round but not too hopeful.  cheers

Have a look at my site here:

https://www.helvetiahistory.co.uk/movements

The 80C is the only version of the Cal 80 so any parts marked 80 should fit.

Thanks. Carl.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2021 at 4:24 PM, markr said:

This one needs a new balance staff.  On the bottom of the back I think it's dated 45.  Anyone know what the movement is?  Anyone have a tech sheet on it?  Thanks for helping.

IMG_4609.JPG

IMG_4606.JPG

IMG_4607.JPG

IMG_4608.JPG

Hi, POST was a registered trade name of General Watch Co. like Helvetia.

For more info have a look at my site here https://www.helvetiahistory.co.uk/history

I would be interested in a picture of the inner case back mainly for the serial number as it will help with my serial number/date lookup if the watch is also inscribed 1945. That date is about correct but the serial would be useful.

Can you make out exactly what it says on the back?

Thanks. Carl

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Factory stamped on the back is-stainless steel back 3152 P 2.  Inside back - Post watch co. Switzerland 4247330.  engraved on the back is -Virginia C.  then some mark I can't read.  Then engraved more professionally - N.R. Laczniak    947-78-62  U.S.N.R.  12-25-45.  Looks like it might have been a Christmas present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, markr said:

Factory stamped on the back is-stainless steel back 3152 P 2.  Inside back - Post watch co. Switzerland 4247330.  engraved on the back is -Virginia C.  then some mark I can't read.  Then engraved more professionally - N.R. Laczniak    947-78-62  U.S.N.R.  12-25-45.  Looks like it might have been a Christmas present.

Thanks, that is really helpful. From the database of serial numbers I have created 4247330 comes out as being made in 1945 so to have the inscription back that up is really helpful.

Try it yourself:

https://www.helvetiahistory.co.uk/serial-numbers

Looks like an interesting watch.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, markr said:

Factory stamped on the back is-stainless steel back 3152 P 2.  Inside back - Post watch co. Switzerland 4247330.  engraved on the back is -Virginia C.  then some mark I can't read.  Then engraved more professionally - N.R. Laczniak    947-78-62  U.S.N.R.  12-25-45.  Looks like it might have been a Christmas present.

By the way, I think the top bit reads 'Virginia C. To N.R. Laczniak'.

Thanks.

Carl

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
    • When faced with say a pocket watch bridge which is cracked, silver soldering to repair is often the only option (hopefully someone wasn't there before hand with soft solder). I can generally do this succesfully and tidily with a small torch and miniscule pieces of silver solder, but on parts which were mercury amalgam gilded the heat can have have a deleterious effect on the finish.   I keep wondering if there's a good way to refinish these - and despite having the needful items would rather avoid using the mercury process.   In the past for electronic work I've gold plated PCBs but this involved gold potassium cyanide solution, which also doesn't realy belong at home. I've read that there are now safer alternatives but couldn't find more detail (and importantly how similar are the results to amalgam gilding, since I wouldn't want to refinish the whole watch). Pointers would be very welcome (and yes, I know solutions containing gold won't be cheap!) Alan
    • The first one is an Unruh max stake for pushing out staffs
    • Ok so with the great answers for my previous question may I ask what these two attachments are used for. The one with the red knob is I assume used for hand setting the seconds hand? Jon      
    • According to Cousins site I need to look at document G22 as I think I need an ATGB at 304 but I cant find this size in G22 doc. The last thing I want to do is order the wrong one😳  Unless I cant see the wood for the trees 😆 I could be looking at the wrong style, I assume its classed as Round plastic Armed  https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/wide-ring-gold-atgb
×
×
  • Create New...