Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings, gents.

I'm in the process of replacing a tension-ring crystal on a vintage 1954 Girard Perregaux wristy. I was not aware that it used such a crystal until after I popped it out in a couple of pieces. Bugger was really in there. I tried finessing it out with a standing pliers style GS press but no luck until I bore down a bit harder. I had also tried a crystal clamp but it wasn't able to squeeze the crystal down enough to press it out, even with taps of a nylon hammer head.

Unfortunately the case bezel grew a bit since I first took what I thought was a good measurement of it and ordered that size crystal. And of course the crystal I got is too small. On the next measurement I found out that the bezel grew about .2mm since the first measurement. ?? As I read up on installing tension-ring/armored crystals I discovered that you don't have a lot of tolerance for a crystal that is too large. .1mm is the maximum oversize from bezel that one should use. This, according to the Sternkreuz catalog details. It also seems that I might not be able to use my GS press, nut-cracker/plier style to install it. In addition, I read that it's quite difficult to install them using the nylon dies that come with the inexpensive case presses. Do I have any chance in fitting the right crystal with the nylon dies (Some dies do have the chamfer to fit over the edge of the crystal and reduce its diameter a touch.) or do I have to buy a "real" crystal press that's heavier duty, or at least uses threads for applying the pressure?

The case is a nice 14K case that I don't want to distort. I think I now understand how it is that some watch cases have broken lugs, etc. People probably using the wrong press and/or applying too much pressure. Any suggestions are appreciated. Many thanks. Cheers all.

 

MrR

 

Posted

There are already a few threads on here discussing this. Mark also made a video. As you say, size is important. Get the size you think you need, and one size bigger. You can rub down the o.d. if necessary. The press you have with the angular contact dies should do the job if the crystal is the right size. The claw tool is the wrong one for this job. You need to get the crystal lined up with the bezel, and the pressure from the die needs to be equal all around.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...