Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

I have a question about the watch dial I'm working on. The numbers: are they painted on or lumed? I've scraped away the "2" and I'm wondering if I should paint it or lume it. If I'm going t repaint it, then what type of paint would I use? Was it common to lume numbers? 

Thanks in advance for any help that can be provided. 

Michael

Watch Dial - Copy.JPG

Posted

My wild guess is that it's lume. It's interesting dial in that they printed the outline of the numbers. This would allow somebody to hand paint the luminescent material on and know where to do it. It'd be interesting to knowing the time frame that the dial and/or watch was made. I'm guessing because it says the word waterproof we can narrow it down for that. Finding a modern luminescent material that's darkening colors going to be interesting. Then because this is a holder luminescent material it's probably dark because it's radium based. But you need a Geiger counter to verify that.

Posted

Thanks John for the reply.

The movement itself is an FHF 175, so from the 40's or 50's. I'm thinking of re-luming the dial and hands. If the watch was water proof the case gasket is no where to be found. Then again maybe only the dial is waterproof and the rest of the time piece isn't ! ?

Posted

As I've heard it, "waterproof" was what they called water-resistant watches before the 1960s when consumer protection laws were put into place limiting use of the misleading phrase in the US.

Almost certainly radium lume, radioactive, half-life of 1600+ years, don't breathe the dust, read up on material safety when working with it.

Some people love the tired old brown lume look, and will replace lume to preserve the look or pay big $$$ for original examples. Others call it dog-s**t lume, and will re-lume the watch to make it look green/white like the lume did when new (except with safe modern lume compound).

I've got a few 1950s watches where the lume dots (circles and triangles) have outlines painted on the dial.

Absolutely would need to replace the gasket, crown and probably crystal to regain water resistance.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am looking for guidance on some Cyma watches I am selling please...Year made approx and possible worth if you could? Also I have a man's Cyma that has numbers stamped around the case where the strap bars are and wonder what they are please. Thanks for and help given. Steve
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • I agree with hector it's probably the regulator curve, it almost always is on these movements. So i work on these movements a lot and iv'e managed to fairly consistently get them running at like 50 degrees more amplitude than that with deltas in the 3 range and on the wrist deviations of sub 1 second a day. They ALWAYS require work to get there though. The main thing is shaping the regulator curve and this is really finnicky and definitely something you practice on a movement you don't care about when you're new (I'm still new) but if the hairspring is flat and the coils are evenly spaced and the regulator curve is properly shaped and it's pretty wild how accurate these movements can get.  But, it does sound like your regulator curve maybe needs a bit of reshaping. You can easily mess up the watch learning to do this so warning if you don't want to live with your current results but I"m not an expert, it's just speculation but there's a pretty easy way to check.  This is a good video showing how to see if your terminal curve is properly shaped. Just make sure the regulator pins are open when you test this.   He takes off the balance wheel to shape it. I do it with the movement disassembled but the balance on the mainplate. I use a homemade tool from a sharpened dental pic to do the adjustments (Tiny tiny TINY adjustments) and i use the regulator pins themselves to sorta brace the spring against to bend it very tiny amounts and just keep checking it by moving the regulator arm down it till it stops moving the hairspring. Taking off the balance wheel over and over again is a good way to slip and destroy your hairspring and will make the process way slower. I try to avoid removing the balance wheel from the cock it on these movements due to how difficult it is to get the hairspring stud back into the balance cock. It's super easy to slip and twist your spring then you got way worse problems.  Since these are mass manufactured and unadjusted the regulator curve is NEVER perfect but once you learn how to reshape them it's pretty easy to do and you can get REALLY low deltas with really low positional error and pretty remarkable accuracy.  Definitely with it powered down and the balance on the movement with both balance jewels in place look across the spring to see if it's perfectly flat, then check the regulator curve how he does it in the video. I would bet money even if it's not your main issue the regulator curve is not ideal also. 
    • Thanks. Damn, first breakage. This picture of the movement is from the sale listing.  
    • Hello all, New member here, hoping  to gain knowledge about something that has been of interest for years.  Cheers!
×
×
  • Create New...