Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Time to add a small tip to this thread—one that I hope someone will find useful.

I've always found it tricky and somewhat nerve-wracking to press the pallet stones into the pallet fork. But then I remembered a video featuring Teddy Baldassarre on a tour of Jaeger-LeCoultre. Wasn't there a segment in that video showing someone inserting pallet stones into pallet forks in an assembly-line fashion? I looked up the video, and sure enough—for once, my memory was correct!

Brasstoolhelpingtopushinpalletstones.thumb.jpg.2860d5a2b7cf262e36d3f2f9d6c1c48b.jpg
Inspired by what I saw, I took a brass rod of suitable size, ground one end into a wedge shape (similar to a screwdriver), and polished the rest of the rod with wet sandpaper to give it an aesthetic finish more in line with Jaeger-LeCoultre. My new brass tool may not have passed the quality control at Jaeger-LeCoultre, but it worked just as intended!

One thing that isn’t visible in the image—and which I should clarify—is that I grip the stone with tweezers and press it in while supporting the opposite side with my new brass tool. It feels safe, easy, and precise.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, VWatchie said:

My new brass tool may not have passed the quality control at Jaeger-LeCoultre, but it worked just as intended!

Engrave Bergeon on it, definitely good enough for Jaeger then.

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, ObsessiveHorologist said:

So when do you use the staking block + new tool, as opposed to using your Gaston tool which is designed to do this exact thing?

The Gaston tool is more for adjusting the stones, when placing a new stone I think it's easier to do just on a block.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, ObsessiveHorologist said:

So when do you use the staking block + new tool, as opposed to using your Gaston tool which is designed to do this exact thing?

Just as watch collectors can never have too many watches, we can never have too many tools! 😉

Joking aside, I use the brass rod to start placing the stones in the fork before fine-adjusting them with the Gaston pallet tool.

However, the Gaston tool isn’t as precise as one might expect. The angle between the pallet stone's impulse surface and the arms of the Gaston tool isn’t always perfect—this seems especially true for the exit stone. If I recall correctly, the impulse surface angle of the exit stone is steeper in low-beat movements than in high-beat ones. As a result, the arm of the Gaston tool can sometimes push the exit stone in the wrong direction, preventing it from seating properly in the fork.

Additionally, attempting to adjust the stone using tweezers while the fork is fixed in the Gaston tool doesn’t seem to work well either.

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...