Jump to content

Seiko 7546


markr

Recommended Posts

It is complicated.  Too complicated to describe.  Look for the "Seiko Casing Guide".  The case back will have a letter code that guides you to the correct procedure.  I think I know what model that is and I have one that I did.  Be warned, there are no new gaskets available for the bezel assembly and it is nylon so shouldn't be reused.  Generic crystal gaskets are similar but don't work well.  I ended up buying a nylon gasket set and tried at least 3 different sizes before I found one tight enough and it was nowhere near the size I measured.  Lastly, the only die size that works is in the Seiko S-220 tool kit.  Generic or plastic dies don't fit correctly. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google this "seiko case servicing guide"  There is a link from seikoserviceusa that will get you to a good casing guide.  If your watch is the same as mine, it should be Case Code G

I could not find a die that fit correctly in my chinese made press.  The Seiko S-220 fits perfectly.  And on this one, the die has to fit perfectly.  The ring that holds the glass is very thin

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bklake said:

Google this "seiko case servicing guide"  There is a link from seikoserviceusa that will get you to a good casing guide. 

No need to even leave this forum, the guide has been posted repeatedly and can be found using the search box top right. Here it is again.

1982.03 Seiko Case Servicing Guide.pdf

And the module service guide 

Seiko 7546A - Technical Guide.pdf

Quote

I could not find a die that fit correctly in my chinese made press.  The Seiko S-220 fits perfectly.  And on this one, the die has to fit perfectly.  The ring that holds the glass is very thin

it's common  to have to make one own own tools, in this case a die. Although  a lathe is required - a wonderful tool to have and learn about.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Case Servicing Guide is a different document.  It is not caliber specific, it is case code specific.  The case code can be found on the case back.  The 7546 was produced around the time that Seiko went to a new code system and it is confusing which code is the code to use.  My 7546 that looks similar to his has a code placement similar to the new system and old system except One code is in a circle rather than a box.  That case code leads you to a square case style that doesn't look anything like the watch.  The case code following the "old" system is the correct one.  Thankfully, the guide is full of pictures/diagrams because I need that.  I couldn't put the link address because it goes straight to a .pdf download for me. 

At first, I suggested searching for "Seiko Casing Guide".  That will lead you to older documents up until the early '70s.  Seiko changed the name to "Case Servicing Guide" in the late '70s early '80s.  Both are useful to have saved. 

He will need the 7546 movement guide in the near future.  This caliber responds extremely well to a clean and service.  And it is very easy to do.

I agree about a lathe and I have one.  I took a shortcut when the Seiko S-220 die set came up.  It is shaped and sized perfectly for Seiko case and crystal work.   I'm not sure I could duplicate the dies on my lathe.  Lack of skill mostly. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...