Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

I have tried to find information regarding the clock I recently received but have found nothing but a couple of images.  My clock is a wood case with faux marbling effect in brown tones.  There is a label on the back of the clock stating SAREPTA Waterbury Clock Company. Also on the label are three address one for NY, one for Chicago and one for Glasgow Scotland.  The number 4283 is stamped on the back of the clock case.  The entire back of the clock comes off to reveal the clock works.  The actual works are small in size.  The clock strikes on the hour and half hour.  There are no identifying markings on the clock dial.  The time regulator is located in the number 12 on the dial, however, the pendulum also has an rolling thread in the middle of it. Not sure the pendulum is original.   Any help dating my clock would be great.   Also the brass on the face and the feet is very tarnished. Does it hurt the value cleaning the brass?

Thank you.

clock5.jpg

clock4.jpg

clock3.jpg

clock2.jpg

clock1.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Your clock is dated around 1895 because of the stamp on the back plate and not a label in side of the case. When it comes to polishing, myself I think it will look odd, you will be removing years of its life away. People like the patina of antiques they don't expect to see them looking like new. Unless you decide to completely restore the whole thing I would leave it alone. I also would say that pendulum is correct. 

Here is the link where I obtained the date see if you agree.

  https://botspro.com/labelstrademarks.php?lm=Waterbury

 

Posted

Hi  There is plenty of information to be had on the waterbury/ansonia and jerome web sites. They are all linked.

Like Old Hippy says don't go bulling up the clock like new as it will spoil the clock, It picked up all the bruises and patina in life and to remove it all is an injustice to the clock as well to quote Old Hippy "it will look odd". So clean it polish it with care, Its a nick old clock and looked after will run another 100 years no problem.

Posted
3 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Your clock is dated around 1895 because of the stamp on the back plate and not a label in side of the case. When it comes to polishing, myself I think it will look odd, you will be removing years of its life away. People like the patina of antiques they don't expect to see them looking like new. Unless you decide to completely restore the whole thing I would leave it alone. I also would say that pendulum is correct. 

Here is the link where I obtained the date see if you agree.

  https://botspro.com/labelstrademarks.php?lm=Waterbury

 

When I try to go to the website in that link Firefox prevents it and I get this warning screen....

EvbxK1R.jpg

Posted
5 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I had the same using Chrome but it is OK to use. I wouldn't post a link if it was dodgy.  

Ok, was looking for the Ansonia link. I have this Ansonia cast iron clock. I got it about 55 years ago. The case was very rusty and as an apprentice in a scientific instrument manufacturers at the time I had access to stove enamelling, so stripped the case and re-finished it.....zQczflR.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Looks good. 

Bearing in mind that the re-enamelling was done about 55 years ago I think that anyone looking at it would be hard pressed to tell that it wasn't the original finish...;). Any idea of the exact age? My thoughts were that it was around 1900.......

Posted

On the back plate it says New York and on the dial so according to Ansonia clock movements with that on the plate/label would have been made between 1883 up to 1929. Sorry I can’t pin it down anymore.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry @nickelsilver, I'm just seeing this now.  It is a standard metric screw plate. I followed the suggestion of doing the thread cutting in a pin vise.  It took me forever because the piece is so delicate that I cut and cleared chips very frequently.  But eventually I did get it.  Not pretty, but I got it; the first thing I ever successfully made on the lathe. I cut the screw slot with a jewelers saw.  How can I ensure that the slot is centered on the screw head?
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello, My name is David and I’m a vintage watch collector/ wanna be hobbyist watchmaker from France. I really want to progress into my watch repairing hobby. For now, I’m only having fun servicing my own watches and spare movements, simple small 3 hands from the 50s (Omega, eterna…) Learning step by step or at least trying to 🙂
    • More setbacks and successes...  After letting the watch run in (but before I fixed the BE) a chunk of the radium lume fell off one of the hands and pulverized leaving radioactive dust all over the dial 😞 ☢️ ☠️ So before I could continue further I decided I would remove the radium lume.  I have removed radium lume from hands before where it was already starting to flake away but this time I had to work out what I was going to do with debris on the dial.  I decided that getting everything under water and removing all the lume was probably the best way to go. So here is what I did... I put an essence jar I use for cleaning parts and filled it with water and put it into a big ziplock bag along with the tools I would need - a sharpened piece of pegwood and  a 0.80mm screwdriver  -  I put on a pair of nitrile gloves and a covid style mask and then opened the back of the watch. Now with the back off the watch I could do the rest inside the bag.  I removed the watch from the case and removed the hands from the dial (through the bag) and then undid the dial screws and removed the dial from the movement.  I then put the hands and the dial and the watch case into the water and removed the movement from the bag.  Carefully and slowly with one hand in the bag and one hand trying to poke and hold stuff through the bag I gently rubbed away the lume from the dial and hands with the pegwood. I then took the parts out of the water and removed the jar from the bag (leaving the parts still in the bag) - with the majority of the dangerous stuff now in the water I disposed of this (down the toilet) and gave the jar a good rinse in running water before refilling it and returning it to the bag where I gave all the parts another rinse in the new water.  I then took the parts and put the geiger counter over the top of them and looked at them carefully under UV light to see if there were any flakes still hanging on. I dried everything with some kitchen towel. Once I was finished will all that I remved the parts from then removed the gloves and put them in the bag with the paper towels and the pegwood and thew the bag in the household waste. Finally I gave the dial, hands and case another rinse in the sink under running water.  I didn't bother following up with a rinse in distilled water water because the water here is pretty clear of limescale etc and I find it doesn't mark! So here are the results of my weekends work! Timegrapher dial down (dial up is almost the same) The fixed shock setting New crystal - and lume removed from dial and hands
    • Hi and welcome! I'm new here too—greetings from Leicester, UK.
×
×
  • Create New...