Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone,

I recently acquired this old Breitling watch as a non runner, I’ve now fixed it and I’m just interested to know a bit more about it! 

Thanks,

Ollie 

 

C3FC864C-776B-4AE8-9390-F66F1E0C29A1.jpeg

30A1DCFF-4EDB-4DF2-8FBA-FB3DE31FDEBF.jpeg

A8763921-7DED-434A-9B37-256C90227C60.jpeg

Posted

My opinion would suggest it's a bit off (e.g franken) Looks like the dial has been stamped breitling and the bridge marked breitling is from a different movement. Hands look like they do not go with the dial.

However I am by no means a expert in breitlings, waiting on more experts to chime in

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Amazingly I was trying to identify what seems to be the same movement only last week! 

My thoughts, like HSL, were that it was a Landeron, but a 47 or 48. however each has subtle differences that don't quite match, The small notch out of the balance bridge for the movement retaining screw being one, and the triangular shaped spring stud just on the other side of that same screw being the other.

Attached are some pics of mine. Found in an old box amongst some junk which I think used to belong to my grandfather. Mine is branded "Richard", had lost it's crystal long ago, but it appears it may have an 18ct case. Amazingly, despite the condition, the balance seems to have survived intact... it even had a weak attempt at running following a light wind, so whoever made it, it seems pretty bombproof (possibly literally! :-) 

 

2020-04-17 19.16.56-1.jpg

2020-04-19 22.21.53-1.jpg

Edited by Vacheron7
Posted

Thanks guys,

So the movement is looking like some sort of Landeron, but it’s not a Breitling?

I’ll keep looking for clues in and around the case, movement and dial.

Thanks!

 

Posted

After a bit of Googling it seems like Breitling used the Landeron 50 in the 50's, I'm not sure if Breitling used any in house movements until recently. 

Having checked the pictures it looks very similar to ours, however the more pictures I look at the more confused I get as none seem to match all features exactly (and there are differences between mine and yours too. 

What I am (so far unsuccessfully) looking for as a match is as follows:

1: Balance bridge, does it have a small cutout where shown or not

2: Triangular fixing on the click spring

3: Some of these bridges (mine) are thicker where shown, whereas some (mine) are narrower and more "figure of 8"

4: Is this part of the chrono pusher mechanism present, and this shape?

So far I haven't found a single other photo which matches all 4 of these on either of our watches, but it is possible some parts may have been swapped out during their lives (the click spring in particular seems to often be missing / broken. 

 

landon.jpg

Posted

When I been working on these Landeron movements, once upon a time it was quite much,  for me the most reveling part usually was the  type of minute recording jumper.
With a type like this my intuition would say it is used mostly on Landeron 48/248 movements or derivates there of. 
The number (4) hammer for the crhorno function is not a sure tell since it fitts on many of them and because of that parts from various time periods can be found in either of the movements.
If one really want to know which movement this is, Landeron always marked them undeneath the balance cock/bridge, just lift it off and the mystery is revealed.(But where is the fun in that)
If I choose to close my eyes and not take a look at the dial I personally would be more comfortable finding something like a Venus 175 or Venus 188 under the lid on a watch like this.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...